Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Doran, Anna Louise; Verran, Joanna (2011)
Publisher: Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease
Journal: Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease
Languages: English
Types: Article
The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the potential of an inulin mouth rinse to reduce the proportions of tongue bacteria associated with oral malodour. Thirteen panellists rinsed with either 10% sucrose or a 10% inulin mouth rinse twice daily for 21 days. Breath odour levels were assessed using a Halimeter† and organoleptic assessment, both before and after sucrose, inulin or water rinses. Tongue pH was registered and the tongue flora was cultured on media selective for total and obligate anaerobes, streptococci and inulin fermenters. There were no differences in baseline Halimeter† levels over the 21 day period, but a slight decrease in organoleptic scores was noted. A reduction in odour levels assessed by Halimeter† and organoleptically was observed immediately after rinsing. The effect was greater by the end of the 21 day regime. Microbial counts remained high, and no significant differences were observed, but there was a trend towards increased streptococcal counts by the end of the 21 day period. Tongue pH baseline levels were approximately neutral, but immediately after carbohydrate rinses a typical Stephan curve was observed. There is some indication that the use of twicedaily carbohydrate mouth rinses (sucrose or the prebiotic inulin) can reduce oral malodour by encouraging the growth of acidogenic bacteria and inhibiting the obligate anaerobes associated with malodour. Inulin is a less cariogenic substrate, and inulin mouth rinsing may provide a novel method for the control of oral malodour.Key words: oral malodour, volatile sulphur compounds, prebiotic, inulin, oral bacteria
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Reingewirtz Y, Girault O, Reingewirtz N, Senger B, Tenebaum H. Mechanical effects and volatile sulphur compoundreducing effects of chewing gums: comparison between test and base gums and a control group. Quintessence Int. 1999;/ 30:/319 23.
    • 2. Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res. 1994;/8:/ 263 71.
    • 3. Verran J, Doran AL, Smith C. Denture stomatitis, oral malodour and oral biofilm ecology. In: Gilbert P, Alison D, Brading M, Verran J, Walker J. editors. Biofilm community interactions: chance or necessity? Cardiff: BioLine; 2001. p. 131 40.
    • 4. McNamara TF, Alexander JF, Lee M. The role of microorganisms in the production of oral malodour. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972;/34:/41 8.
    • 5. Doran A, Kneist S, Verran J. Ecological control: in vitro inhibition of anaerobic bacteria by oral streptococci. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2004;/16:/23 7.
    • 6. Gibson GR, Beatty ER, Wang X, Cummings JH. Selective stimulation of bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology. 1995;/108:/975 82.
    • 7. Marsh P, Martin M. Oral microbiology, 4th edn. Oxford: Wright; 1999.
    • 8. Kazor CE, Mitchell PM, Lee AM, Stokes LN, Loesche WJ, Dewihurst FE, et al. Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;/41:/558 63.
    • 9. Burton JP, Chilcott CN, Moore CJ, Speiser G, Tagg JR. A preliminary study of the effect of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral malodour parameters. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;/100:/754 64.
    • 10. Doran AL, Greenman J, Verran J. Approaches to the control of oral malodour I: a clinical study on the antimicrobial and breath-freshening effect of zinc-containing lozenge formulations. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2007 (in press).
    • 11. Rosenberg M, Kulkarni GV, Bosy A. Reproducibility and sensitivity of oral malodour measurements with a portable sulphide monitor. J Dent Res. 1991;/11:/1436 40.
    • 12. Tonzetich J. Direct gas chromatographic analysis of sulphur compounds in mouth air in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1971;/16:/ 587 97.
    • 13. Tonzetich J, Ng SK. Reduction of oral malodour by oral cleansing procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;/ 42:/172 81.
    • 14. Matula C, Hildebrandt M, Nahler G. Decontamination of the oral cavity. Effect of six local anti-microbial preparations in comparison to water and parafilm as controls. J Int Med Res. 1988;/16:/98 106.
    • 15. Schmidt NF, Tarbet WJ. The correlation between organoleptic mouth-odour ratings and levels of volatile sulphur compounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;/45:/560 7.
    • 16. Silwood CJ, Grootveld MC, Lynch E. A multifactoral investigation of the ability of oral health products (OHCPs) to alleviate oral malodour. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;/28:/ 634 41.
    • 17. Adams D, Addy M. Mouthrinses. Adv Dent Res. 1994;/8:/ 291 301.
    • 18. Staat RH, Gawronski TH, Cressey D. Effect of dietary sucrose levels on the quantity and microbial composition of human dental plaque. J Dent Res. 1975;/54:/872 80.
    • 19. Minah GE, Solomon ES, Chu K. The association between dietary sucrose consumption and microbial population shifts at six oral sites in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1985;/30:/397 401.
    • 20. Hogg SD, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Can the oral flora adapt to sorbitol? J Dent Res. 1991;/19:/263 71.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from