Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Olofsson, Anders D.; Lindberg, J. Ola; Jianli, Jiao; Gu, Limin (2013)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Recent years have seen the increased use of digital technologies for educational activities at all levels of the education system (Jopling, 2012). The one-to-one initiative (also called the 1:1 initiative), referring to one digital device per student (Penuel, 2006), is widespread in many parts of the Western world (see, for example, Bebell & O’Dwyer, 2010; Fleischer, 2012), with the Nordic countries being no exception (Kroksmark, 2011; JRC, 2013). On a policy level, digital technologies are said to influence teaching and learning (OECD, 2009) and to embody the potential to both improve and change activities in school settings (European Commission, 2008). This optimistic yet also naïve understanding of digital technologies in schools expressed on the policy level represents a challenge. 
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bebell, D. & O'Dwyer, L.M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computer settings. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(1), 5 15.
    • Datorn i utbildningen. 2013. http://www2.diu.se/framlar/egen-dator/ (Accessed 2013-10-24).
    • Education and Research Department. 2004. Kompetanse for utvikling. Strategi for kompetanseutvikling i grunnopplaeringen, 2005 2008. http://www.utdanningsdirektoratet.no/upload/
    • Education and Research Department. 2007. Digital kompetanse. Plan for kunnskapsdannelse, laering og erfaringsdeling , 2007 2008. http://www.udir.no/upload/ Satsningsomraader/ digital_kompetanse/
    • Engestro¨m, Y. (2008). Weaving the texture of school change. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 379 383.
    • Erstad, O. & Hauge, T-E. (eds.), 2011. Skoleutvikling og digitala medier. Kompelksitet, mangfold og ekspansiv laering. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
    • European Commission. 2008. Commission Staff Working Document. The use of ICT to support innovation and lifelong learning for all A report on progress. Brussels, 09/10/2008 SEC(2008), 2629 final.
    • Fengguang, J., Juan, Z. & Ping, H. (2013). The survey of degree of satisfaction and requirements towards e-Schoolbag: a Chinese teachers' perspective. Journal of Open Education Research, 4, 68 73.
    • Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107 122.
    • Gu, L. & Lindberg, O.J. (2009). Technology enhanced teacher professional development Sweden: policies, literature and recent initiatives. Distance Education Journal, 4, 23 28.
    • Inan, F.A. & Lowther, D.L. (2010). Laptops in the K 12 classrooms: exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55, 937 944.
    • ITU Monitor. 2009. Monitor, 2009. Skolens digitale tilstand. http://www.itu.no/filestore/ Rapporter_-_PDF/ITU_monitor09_web.pdf
    • ITU Monitor. 2011. Monitor, 2011. Skolens digitale tilstand http://iktsenteret.no/sites/iktsenteret. no/files/attachments/monitor2011.pdf
    • Jopling, M. (2012). 1:1 online tuition: a review of the literature from a pedagogical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 310 321.
    • JRC. 2013 Overview and analysis of 1:1 learning initiative in Europe. Report EUR26004. European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    • Kroksmark, T. (2011). La¨randets stretchadhet. La¨randets digitala mysterium i En-till-En-miljo¨er i skolan. Didaktisk Tidskrift, 20(1), 1 22.
    • Lawless, K.A. & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns, and way to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575 614.
    • Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts. Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. London: Routledge.
    • NIFU. 2013. IKT i laererutdanningen. Pa˚ vei mot profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse? Rapport, 20/2013.
    • Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: a research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329 358.
    • OECD. 2009. New millennium learners. OECD, Utbildningsdirektoratet.
    • Olofsson, A.D., Lindberg, J.O., Fransson, G. & Hauge, T.E. (2011). Uptake and use of digital technologies in primary and secondary schools a thematic review of research. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 208 226.
    • Somekh, B. 2008. Factors affecting teachers' pedagogical adoption of ICT. In International Handbook of Informational Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, Voogt, J. and Knezek, G. (eds.), pp. 449 460. New York: Springer.
    • Stake, R. 2006. Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
    • The National Agency for Education. 2007. Redovisning av uppdrag om att utarbeta en plan f¨or en f¨orb¨attrad uppf¨oljning av IT-anv¨andning och IT-kompetens i f¨orskola, skola och vuxenutbildning. Stockholm: Skolverket.
    • The National Agency for Education. 2009. Redovisning av uppdraget att bed¨oma verksamheters och huvudm¨ans utvecklingsbehov avseende IT-anv¨andningen inom f¨orskola, skola och vuxenutbildning samt ge f¨orslag pa˚ insatser. Stockholm: Skolverket.
    • The Agency for School Improvement. 2008. Effective use of ICT in schools. Analysis of international research. Stockholm.
    • Utdanningsdirektoratet. 2007. Digital kompetanse. Plan for kunnskapsdannelse, laering og erfaringsdeling , 2007-2008. http://www.udir.no/upload/Satsningsomraader/digital_ kompetanse/
    • Warschauer, M. & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179 225.
    • Weston, M. & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: the naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6), 5 25.
    • Yonghe, W., Zhiting, Z. & Chao, H. (2012). Research on the framework of specification for e-Textbook and e-Schoolbag. Journal of East China Normal University (National Science), 2, 70 80.
    • Zhiting, Z. & Xiaohua, Y. (2011). Systems of the electronic schoolbag and its functional modeling. Journal of E-Education Research, 4, 24 34.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

    Title Year Similarity



Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from