Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Physics::Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Part I of this study analysed the statistical structure of the mid-latitude errors of the short-range wind forecasts used in the global data assimilation system at ECMWF, by comparing the forecasts with verifying radiosonde data over North America. After an analysis of the corresponding statistics for the errors of the height forecasts, this paper studies the covariance of the height and wind forecast errors. The methods of Part I, based on the kinematics of homogeneous turbulence, are used to provide a spectral description of the height autocovariance function and of the cross-covariances of height with stream function and velocity potential. Particular attention is paid to the question of the degree of geostrophy of the non-divergent forecast errors. As a by-product, the calculations provide estimates of the vertical covariance matrices for prediction error and radiosonde observational error in the height field, where the term observational error includes both instrumental error and errors of representativeness. The forecast errors for height are comparable in magnitude with the observation errors, and there are good grounds for increasing the resolution of the analysis system, both in the horizontal and the vertical. The height errors have a substantial large-scale component whose vertical structure has a very broad scale; the geostrophic wind errors are dominated by synoptic scales. There is a high directional correlation (0.89) between the geostrophic wind and the stream function wind. The magnitudes of the geostrophic and non-divergent wind errors agree to within 15% in the troposphere. In the stratosphere, the geostrophic wind errors are somewhat smaller than the non-divergent wind errors, indicating a possible aliasing from the large scales to synoptic scales in our calculations there. The correlation of height and velocity potential is such as to imply convergence in lows in the troposphere, but divergence in lows in the stratosphere. The methods developed here and in Part I offer a powerful set of diagnostic tools with which to improve both analysis and short-range forecast performance.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.1986.tb00461.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bergman, K. H. 1979. Multivariate analysis of temperatures and winds using optimum interpolation. Mon. Wea.Rev. 107, 1423-1444.
    • Buell, C. E. 1957. An approximate relation between the variability of wind and the variability of pressure or height in the atmosphere. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. So(*. 38,47-5 1.
    • Daley, R. 1985. The analysis of synoptic scale divergence by a statistical interpolation scheme. Mon. Wea.Rev. 113, 1066-1079.
    • Fisher, R. A. 1921. On the probable error of a correlation deduced from a small sample Metron. I, Part 4,3-32.
    • Gandin, L. S. 1963. Objective analysis of meteorological fields. Translated from Russian by the Israeli Program for Scientific Translations (1965).
    • Gustavsson, N. 1981. A review of methods for objective analysis. In: Dynamic meteorology-data assimilation methods. Ed. L. Bengtsson, M. Ghil, E. KaIIen. Springer-Verlag.
    • Hildebrand, F. B. 1962. Advanced calculus f o r applications. Prentice-Hall, pp. 646.
    • Hollett, S. R. 1975. 3-dimensional spatial correlations of P E forecast errors. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Meteorology, McGiU University, Montreal, Canada. 73 PP.
    • Hollingsworth, A., Shaw, D. B., Lonnberg, P., IUari, L., Arpe, K., Simmons, A. J. 1986. Monitoring of Observation quality by a data assimilation system. Mon. Wea.Rev. in press.
    • Hollingsworth, A. and Lonnberg, P. 1986. The statistical structure of short range forecast errors a s determined from radiosonde data. Part I: The wind field. Tellus 38.4, 111-136.
    • Julian, P. R. and Thiebaux, H. J. 1975. On some properties of correlation functions used in optimum interpolation schemes. Mon. Wea.Rev. 103,605-6 16.
    • Lorenc, A. C. 1981. A global three-dimensional multivariate statistical interpolation scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev. 109,701-721.
    • Machenhauer, B. 1977. On the dynamics of gravity oscillations in a shallow water model, with application to normal mode initialisation. Contrib. Atmos. Phys. 50,253-271.
    • Panchev, S. 1971. Random functions and turbulence. Pergamon Press, 444 pp.
    • Phillips, N. A. 1963. Geostrophic Motion. Rev. Geophys. 1,123-176.
    • Phillips, N. A. 1986. The spatial statistics of random geostrophic modes and first-guess errors. TeUus 38.4, in press.
    • Rutherford, 1. D. 1972. Data assimilation by statistical interpolation of forecast error fields. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 809-8 15.
    • Schlatter, T. W. 1975. Some experiments with a multivariate statistical objective analysis scheme. Mon. Wea.Rev. 103,246-257.
    • Wergen, W. 1982. Initialisation, in ECMWF Seminar on Interpretation of numerical weather prediction products, 32-58.
    • WMO 1983. Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation, 5th edition. W M O pubn. No. 8, Geneva.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from