Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pirilä, Päivi; Seikkula, Tommi; Välimäki, Petteri (2007)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: diffusing capacity; ethnic differences; Finnish; middle European; Sami; total lung capacity
OBJECTIVES: To compare European (ECSC) and Finnish reference values for single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL(CO)). STUDY DESIGN: Finnish reference values for DL(CO), specific diffusing capacity (DL(CO)/VA) and total lung capacity (TLC) were compared with ECSC reference values calculated for different age, height and weight groups. In addition, 10 healthy subjects performed the test with both the Finnish method (inhaled volume 90% of vital capacity, VC) and the ECSC method (inhaled volume 100% of VC). METHODS: Percentual differences between the ECSC and Finnish reference values for DL(CO), TLC and DL(CO)/VA were calculated. The results of measurements of DL(CO) and TLC by using inhaled volume of 100% of VC and 90% of VC in 10 healthy subjects were compared. RESULTS: The Finnish DL(CO) reference value for men was 3-12% and for women 8-20% smaller than the ECSC reference value. TLC calculated according to Finnish equations was 2-14% greater than that based on ECSC equations. The ECSC reference value for DL(CO)/VA was about 20% greater than the Finnish reference value in men and 30% greater than that in women. The 10 healthy subjects had significantly higher DL(CO) when measured according to the ECSC method as compared with the Finnish one (p < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The Finnish reference values for DL(CO) were about 10% smaller, but TLC 10% and DL(CO)/VA 20-30% greater than ECSC reference values in subjects of the same age, height, weight and gender. The difference in DL(CO) is explained by the different inhaled lung volumes used in the two methods, the difference in lung volumes probably arising from ethnic differences in thoracic cavity.Keywords: diffusing capacity; ethnic differences; Finnish; middle European; Sami; total lung capacity(Int J Circumpolar Health 2007; 66(5):449-457)
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Cotes JE. Lung function throughout life: Determinants and reference values. In: Lung function. Assessment and application in medicine. Fifth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1993. p. 445- 513.
    • 2. Yang T-S, Peat J, Keena V, Donnelly P, Unger W, Woolcock A. A reveiw of the racial differences in the lung function of normal Caucasian, Chinese and Indian subjects. Eur Respir J 1991;4:872-880.
    • 3. Quanjer Ph H, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R. J-C Yearnault. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society Eur Respir J Suppl 1993;16:5-40.
    • 4. Donnelly PM, Yang T-S, Peat JK, Woolcock JA. What factors explain racial differences in lung volumes? Eur Respir J 1991;4:829-838.
    • 5. Rossiter CE, Weill H. Ethnic difference in lung function: evidence for proportional differences. Int J Epidemiol 1974;3:55-61.
    • 6. Frisancho AR. Functional adaptation of high altitude hypoxia. Science 1975;187:313-319.
    • 7. Pesola GR, Sunmonu Y, Huggins G, Ford JG. Measured diffusion capacity versus prediction equation estimates in blacks without lung disease. Respiration 2004;71:848-892.
    • 8. Neas LM, Schwarzt J. The determinants of pulmonary diffusing capacity in a national sample of U.S. adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:656-664.
    • 9. Miller GJ, Saunders MJ, Gin RJ et al. Lung function in healthy boys and girls in Jamaica in relation to ethnic composition, test exercise performance and habitual physical activity. Thorax 1977;32:486-496.
    • 10. Cotes JE, Saunders MJ, Adan JER, Anderson HR, Hall AM. Lung function in coastal and highland New Guineans - comparison with Europeans. Thorax 1973;28: 320-330.
    • 11. Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Quanjer PhH, Roca J, Yernault JC. Standardization of the measurement of transfer factor (Diffusing capacity). Eur Respir J Suppl 1993;16: 41-52.
    • 12. American Thoracic Society. Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor). Recommendations for a standard technique - 1995 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:2185-21898.
    • 13. American Thoracic Society. Lung function testing: Selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:1202-1218.
    • 14. Stocks J, Quanjer Ph H. Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. Eur Respir J 1995;8:492-506.
    • 15. Viljanen AA, editor. In: Reference values for spirometric, pulmonary diffusing capacity and body plethysmographic studies. Scand J Clin Invest Suppl. 1982;159:1- 50.
    • 16. European Community for Steel and Coal. Summary equations of reference values. Quanjer Ph H (Ed.). Bull Europ Physiopath Resp 1983;19(Suppl 5):7-10.
    • 17. Piirilä P, Lindqvist A, Rytilä P, Välimäki P, Sovijärvi ARA. Mitä viitearvoja tulisi käyttää Suomeen muuttaneiden ulkomaalaisten spirometriatuloksia arvioitaessa? Suomen Lääkärilehti 2001;44:4487-4492.
    • 18. Sovijärvi ARA. Day-to-day variation of single-breath diffusing capacity and lung volumes in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, diffuse interstitial lung disease and in healthy subjects. Am Rev Respis Dis 1986;133(4), part 2:Abstr. A 385.
    • 19. Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, Johnson DC, van der Grinten CP, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Enright P, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Wanger J. Standardisation of lung function testing - Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J 2005;26(4):720-735.
    • 20. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, van der Grinten CPM, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Wanger J. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Series “ATS/ERS task force: standardisation of lung function testing.” Eur Respir J 2005:26(5):948- 968.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from