LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Smagorinsky, J.; Miyakoda, K.; Strickler, R. F. (2011)
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Journal: Tellus A
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Tests were made to evaluate the relative importance of large errors in some of the variables formally required to specify initial conditions for the time integration of the hydro-thermodynamic equations for the atmospheric motion. The prime purpose was to analyze the adjustment process immediately following the initial disturbance. The variables selected were the surface pressure, the water vapor, the boundary layer temperature, and the boundary layer wind. It is likely that these quantities are not individually nor possibly even collectively essential to the definition of initial conditions because of dynamic coupling. The experiments showed that the predictions appear almost the same after about six hours irrespective of the initial values of these quantities. But after several days, the subsequent error behaves similar to the growth noted in predictability experiments.DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1970.tb01516.x
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bolin, B. 1953. The adjustment of a non-balanced velocity field toward geostrophic equilibrium in a stratified field. Tellus 5, 373-385.
    • Cahn, A. 1945. An investigation of the free oscillations of a simple current system. J. Meteor. 2, 113-1 19.
    • Eady, E. T. 1949. Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus 1, 258-277.
    • Kibel, I. A. 1955. 0 prisposoblenii dvizenia vozducha k geostroficheskomu. Doklady Akademii Nauk S S S R 104, 60-63.
    • Lorenz, E . N. 1963. The predictability of hydrodynamic flow. Trans. New York Acad. Sci., Ser. 2, 25, 409-432.
    • Lorenz, E. N. 1965. A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus 17, 321- 333.
    • Manabe, S., Smagorinsky, J. & Strickler, R. F. 1965. Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrologic cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev. 93, 769-798.
    • Mintz, Y. 1963. Meteorological satellites and numerical weather prediction. The Application of Passive Microwave Technology to Satellite Meteorology. A Symposium, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Memo RM-3401 NASA, 1962.
    • Miyakoda, K., Smagorinsky, J., Strickler, R. F. & Hembree, G. D. 1969. Experimental extended predictions with a nine-level hemispheric model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 97, 1-76.
    • Monin, A. S. & Obukhov, A. M. 1959. A note on general classification of motions in a baroclinic atmosphere. Tellus 11, 159-162.
    • National Academy of Sciences. 1966. The feasibility of a global observation and analysis experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. SOC.4 7 , 200-220.
    • Obukhov, A. 1949. On the question of geostrophic wind. Izvest. Akad. S S S R , Ser. Geograf. i. Geofiz, 13, (4).
    • Phillips, N. A. 1963. Geostrophic motion. Review8 of Ueophydca 1, The Amer. Geophys. Union. 176.
    • Raethjen, P. 1950. Vber die gegenseitige Adaptation der Druck und Stromfelder. Arch. f. Meteor. Uwph. u. Bioklim., A Bd. K, 207-222.
    • Rossby, C. G. 1938. On the mutual adjustment of pressure and velocity distribution in certain simple current systems. J. Marine Research 1 , 239-263.
    • Smagorinsky, J. 1969. Problems and promises of deterministic extended range forecasting. Bull. Amer. Meteor. SOC.50, 286-311.
    • Smagorinsky, J., Manabe, S. & Holloway, J. L. 1965. Numerical results from a nine-level general circulation model of the atmosphere. Mon. Wea. Rev. 93, 727-768.
    • Smagorinsky, J., Strickler, R. F., Sangster, W. E., Manabe, S., Holloway, J. L. & Hembree, G. D. 1967. Prediction experiments with a general circulation model. Proceedings of the International Sympodum on Dynamics of Large Scale Procea8e-s i n the Atmosphere, Moscow, USSR, June 23-30, 1965, Izdatel stvo, Nauka, Moscow, 1967, 70-134.
    • Washington, W. M. 1964. A note on the adjustment towards geostrophic equilibrium in a simple fluid system. Tellus 16, 530-534.
    • Veronis, G. 1956. Partition of energy between geostrophic and nongeostrophic ocean motions. Deep Sea Research 3, 157-177.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from