Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Robinson, Carol (2011)
Publisher: Education Inquiry
Journal: Education Inquiry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: children’s rights, student voice, power participation, students as researchers
This paper aims to develop understandings around the factors which facilitate and those which constrain implementation of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989; UN General Assembly Resolution 44/25) in student voice projects. Article 12 is concerned with children being given the right to express their views freely, and for their views to be given due weight in matters affecting them. The paper considers empirical evidence from student voice projects in two schools in the south of England. Through examining the complex, micro-processes of school practices which came into play during the projects, it is argued that the power imbalance in student–teacher relationships plays a significant role in terms of inhibiting and enabling the implementation of Article 12. The paper draws on the work of Freire, Giroux and Foucault to help develop an understanding of the power differentials within student–teacher relationships.Keywords: children’s rights, student voice, power participation, students as researchers(Published: 1 September 2011)Citation: Education Inquiry Vol. 2, No. 3, September 2011, pp.437–451
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alcoff (1992) The problem of speaking for others, Cultural Critique, 20, 5-32.
    • Anderson, P. (2001) Research by children: Rights and methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice 4 (2), 139-153.
    • Aronowitz, S. and Giroux, H.A. (1993) Education under siege. Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.
    • Boostrom, R. (1991) The nature and functions of classroom rules. Curriculum Enquiry, 21 (2) 193-216.
    • Bourdieiu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Covell, K., Howe, B. and McNeil, J.K. (2010) Implementing children's human rights education in schools. Improving Schools, Vol. 13 No. 2, 117-132.
    • Fielding, M. (2009) Interrogating Student Voice: Pre-occupations, Purposes and Possibilities, in Daniels, H. Lauder, H. and Porter, J. (eds.) Educational theories, cultures and learning: a critical perspective, London, New York: Routledge.
    • Giroux, H. (1993) Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis, Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 257-293. Lundy, L. (2007) “Voice” is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 33, No. 6, 927- 942.
    • Lynch, K. (1989) The Hidden Curriculum: Reproduction in Education, A reappraisal. London: The Falmer Press.
    • Lynch, K. and Lodge, A. (2002) Equality and Power in School: Redistribution, Recognition and Representation, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
    • McIntyre, D., Pedder, D. and Rudduck, J. (2005) Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable learning for teachers, Research papers in education 20, 149-168.
    • Robinson, C. and Taylor, C. (2007) Theorising student voice: values and perspectives, Improving Schools, Vol. 10, No. 1, 5-17.
    • Rudduck (2006) The past, the present and the project, Educational Review, 58(2), 131-43.
    • Sherman, A. (1996) Rules, Routines and Regimentation. Nottingham: Educational Heretics Press.
    • Rudduck, J. and Fielding, M. (2006) Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58 (2) 219-231.
    • Rudduck, J. and Flutter, J. (2000) Pupil participation and pupil perspectives: “carving a new order of experience”. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30 (1), 75-89.
    • Rudduck, J. and Flutter, J. (2004) How to improve your school. London: Continuum.
    • Thornberg, R. (2009) The moral construction of the good pupil embedded in school rules, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 4 No. 3, 245-261.
    • Thornberg, R. (2010) A study of children's conceptions of school rules by investigating their judgements of transgressions in the absence of rules. Educational Psychology, 30, 5, 583-603.
    • United Nations. 1989. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. UN General Assembly Resolution 44/25. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from