LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
M. Y. Kaltakci; M. Ozturk; M. H. Arslan (2010)
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Journal: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: G, GE1-350, Geography. Anthropology. Recreation, QE1-996.5, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Environmental sciences, Geology, TD1-1066
The strength and rigidity of most reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Turkey, which are frequently hit by destructive earthquakes, is not at a sufficient level. Therefore, the result of earthquakes is a significant loss of life and property. The strengthening method most commonly preferred for these type of RC buildings is the application of RC infilled walls (shear walls) in the frame openings of the building. However, since the whole building has to be emptied and additional heavy costs arise during this type of strengthening, users prefer not to strengthen their buildings despite the heavy risk they are exposed to. Therefore, it is necessary to develop easier-to-apply and more effective methods for the rapid strengthening of housing and the heavily-used public buildings which cannot be emptied during the strengthening process (such as hospitals and schools). This study empirically analyses the different methods of a new system which can meet this need. In this new system, named "external shear wall application", RC shear walls are applied on the external surface of the building, along the frame plane rather than in the building. To this end, 7 test samples in 1/2 and 1/3 geometrical scale were designed to analyse the efficiency of the strengthening technique where the shear wall leans on the frame from outside of the building (external shear wall application) and of the strengthening technique where a specific space is left between the frame and the external shear wall by using a coupling beam to connect elements (application of external shear wall with coupling beam). Test results showed that the maximum lateral load capacity, initial rigidity and energy dissipation behaviours of the samples strengthened with external shear wall were much better than those of the bare frames.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anil, O¨ . and Altin, S.: An Experimental study on reinforced concrete partially infilled frames, Eng. Struct., 29(3), 449-460, March 2007.
    • Anil, O¨ ., Altin, S., and Kara, M. E.: Strengthening of RC nonductile frames with RC infills-An experimental study, Cement Concrete Comp., 30(7), 612-621, August 2008.
    • Arslan, M. H. and Korkmaz, H. H.: What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey?, Eng. Fail. Anal., 14, 1-22, 2007.
    • Arslan, M. H.: Strengthening non-ductile reinforced concrete frames by columns failure in tension by appending external shear wall, Ph.D. thesis, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, 2007.
    • Arslan, M. H., Yuksel, I., and Kaltakci, M. Y.: An Investigation on global ductility of strengthened 2 story 2 bay RC frames, Struct. Build. J., 163(SB3), 177-194, 2010.
    • Bal, I. E., Crowly, H., Pinho, R., and Gu¨lay, F. G.: Structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock in Northern Marmara Region for loss assesment applications, IUSS Press, 2007.
    • Bruneau, M.: Building damage from the Marmara, Turkey Earthquake of August 1999, J. Seismol., 6, 357-77, 2002.
    • Canbay, E., Ersoy, U., and Ozcebe, G.: Contribution of reinforced concrete infills to seismic behaviour of structural systems, ACI Struct. J., 100(5), 637-643, September-October 2003.
    • Canbay, E., Ersoy, U., and Tankut, T.: A three component force transducer for reinforced concrete structural testing, Eng. Struct., 26, 257-265, 2004.
    • Cannon, R. W.: Straight talk about anchorage to concrete-Part 1, ACI Struct. J., 92(6), 580-586, 1995.
    • Chan, C. M., Ning, F., and Mickleborough, N. C.: Lateral stiffness characteristics of tall reinforced concrete buildings under service loading, Struct. Des. Tall Buil., 9, 365-383, 2000.
    • Dogangu¨n, A.: Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1. 2003 Bingol Earthquake in Turkey, Eng. Struct., 26, 841-856, 2004.
    • Erdem, I., Akyuz, U., Ersoy, U., and Ozcebe, G.: An Experimental study on two different strengthening techniques for RC frames, Eng. Struct., 28(13), 1843-1851, November 2006.
    • Hakan Arslan, M.: Application of ANN to evaluate effective parameters affecting failure load and displacement of RC buildings, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 967-977, doi:10.5194/nhess-9- 967-2009, 2009.
    • Kamanli, M. and Balik, F. S.: The behaviour of roof gable walls under the effect of earthquake load, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 251-263, doi:10.5194/nhess-10-251-2010, 2010.
    • Kara, M. E. and Altin, S.: Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with reinforced concrete partial infills, ACI Struct. J., 701-709, 2006.
    • Kaltakci, M. Y., Yavuz, G., and Arslan, M. H.: The effect of column cross section to frame ductility in RC frames having poor seismic performance, J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2(10), 1524-1532, 2007.
    • Kaltakci, M. Y., Arslan, M. H., Yilmaz, U. S., and Arslan, H. D.: A new approach on the strengthening of primary school buildings in Turkey: An application of external shear wall, Build. Environ., 43, 983-990, 2008.
    • Ozcebe, E., Ersoy, U., Tankut, T., Erduran, E., Keskin, O., and Mertol, C. H.: Strengthening of brick infilled RC frames with CFRP, Technical Report, Middle East Technical University (METU), Structural Laboratory, TUBITAK-METU Press, 2003.
    • Ozturk, M.: Strengthening of reinforced concrete frames of insufficient earthquake resistance by applying external shear wall with coupling beam, Ph.D. thesis, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey 2010.
    • Sezen, H., Whittaker, A. S., Elwood, K. J., and Mosalam, K. W.: Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17. 1999 Kocaeli Turkey Earthquake and the seismic design and construction practice in Turkey, Eng. Struct., 25, 103-14, 2003.
    • Sonuvar, M., Ozcebe, G., and Ersoy, U.: Rehabilitation of reinforced concrete frames with reinforced concrete infills, ACI Struct. J., 101(4), 401-500, July-August 2004.
    • Sozen, M. A.: Toward a behaviour based design of reinforced concrete frames to resist earthquakes, in: Proceedings of The Ninth Technical Conference of Turkish Society of Civil Engineering, V1, Ankara-Turkey, 1-47, 1987 (in Turkish).
    • TEC-2007: Turkish Earthquake Code, Regulations on structures constructed in disaster regions, Ministry of Public Works And Settlement, Ankara, 2007.
    • Zhao, Q. and Astaneh, A. A.: Cyclic behaviour of traditional and innovative composite shear walls, J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 130(2), 271-284, February 2004.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article