Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Santise, M.; Fornari, M.; Forlani, G.; Roncella, R. (2014)
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: TA1-2040, T, TA1501-1820, Applied optics. Photonics, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Technology
The growing use of UAS platform for aerial photogrammetry comes with a new family of Computer Vision highly automated processing software expressly built to manage the peculiar characteristics of these blocks of images. It is of interest to photogrammetrist and professionals, therefore, to find out whether the image orientation and DSM generation methods implemented in such software are reliable and the DSMs and orthophotos are accurate. On a more general basis, it is interesting to figure out whether it is still worth applying the standard rules of aerial photogrammetry to the case of drones, achieving the same inner strength and the same accuracies as well. With such goals in mind, a test area has been set up at the University Campus in Parma. A large number of ground points has been measured on natural as well as signalized points, to provide a comprehensive test field, to check the accuracy performance of different UAS systems. In the test area, points both at ground-level and features on the buildings roofs were measured, in order to obtain a distributed support also altimetrically. Control points were set on different types of surfaces (buildings, asphalt, target, fields of grass and bumps); break lines, were also employed. The paper presents the results of a comparison between two different surveys for DEM (Digital Elevation Model) generation, performed at 70 m and 140 m flying height, using a Falcon 8 UAS.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Berni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Suárez, L., & Fereres, E. (2009). Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 47(3), pp. 722-738.
    • Deseilligny, M. P., & Clery, I., 2011. Apero, an open source bundle adjustment software for automatic calibration and orientation of set of images. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Symposium 3DARCH11, Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci, Vol. 38-5W16 pp. 269-277.
    • Eisenbeiss, H., 2009. UAS Photogrammetry. Thesis Diss. ETH No. 18515, Technische Wissenschaften ETH Zurich, IGP Mitteilung N. 105.
    • Gini, R., Passoni, D., Pinto, L., & Sona, G. (2012). Aerial images from an UAS system: 3d modeling and tree species classification in a park area. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci, Vol 39/B1, pp. 361-366.
    • González-Aguilera, D., Fernández-Hernández, J., ManceraTaboada, J., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Hernández-López, D., Felipe-García, B., .Gozalo-Sanz, I., & Arias-Perez, B. (2012). 3D Modelling and Accuracy Assessment of Granite Quarry Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 1-3, 37-42.
    • Kraus, K. (2007). Photogrammetry: geometry from images and laser scans. Walter de Gruyter.
    • Pagnano, A., Hoepf, M., Teti R., 2013, A Roadmap for Automated Power Line Inspection. Maintenance and Repair. Proc. Eighth CIRP, Volume 12, 2013, 234-239 PhotoScan, 2014. Algorithms used in Photoscan (last accessed May,9th2014)
    • http://www.agisoft.ru/forum/index.php?topic=89.0 Remondino, F., Del Pizzo, S., Kersten, T. P., & Troisi, S. (2012). Low-cost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation-a critical overview. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation (pp. 40-54). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    • Roncella, R., Re, C., & Forlani, G. (2011). Performance evaluation of a structure and motion strategy in architecture and cultural heritage. Int. Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(5/W16).
    • Snavely, N., Seitz, S. M., & Szeliski, R. (2006). Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 25(3), 835-846.
    • Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of structure from motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 203(1153), 405-426.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.