LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Albin, Thomas; Koschny, Detlef; Molau, Sirko; Srama, Ralf; Poppe, Björn (2017)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 550, 520, 500
In this paper, we analyse the technical biases of two intensified video cameras, ICC7 and ICC9, of the double-station meteor camera system CILBO (Canary Island Long-Baseline Observatory). This is done to thoroughly understand the effects of the camera systems on the scientific data analysis. We expect a number of errors or biases that come from the system: instrumental errors, algorithmic errors and statistical errors. We analyse different observational properties, in particular the detected meteor magnitudes, apparent velocities, estimated goodness-of-fit of the astrometric measurements with respect to a great circle and the distortion of the camera.

We find that, due to a loss of sensitivity towards the edges, the cameras detect only about 55 % of the meteors it could detect if it had a constant sensitivity. This detection efficiency is a function of the apparent meteor velocity.

We analyse the optical distortion of the system and the goodness-of-fit of individual meteor position measurements relative to a fitted great circle. The astrometric error is dominated by uncertainties in the measurement of the meteor attributed to blooming, distortion of the meteor image and the development of a wake for some meteors. The distortion of the video images can be neglected.

We compare the results of the two identical camera systems and find systematic differences. For example, the peak magnitude distribution for ICC9 is shifted by about 0.2–0.4 mag towards fainter magnitudes. This can be explained by the different pointing directions of the cameras. Since both cameras monitor the same volume in the atmosphere roughly between the two islands of Tenerife and La Palma, one camera (ICC7) points towards the west, the other one (ICC9) to the east. In particular, in the morning hours the apex source is close to the field-of-view of ICC9. Thus, these meteors appear slower, increasing the dwell time on a pixel. This is favourable for the detection of a meteor of a given magnitude.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Albin, T., Koschny, D., Drolshagen, G., Soja, R., Srama, R., and Poppe, B.: Influence of the pointing direction and detector sensitivity variations on the detection rate of a double station meteor camera, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Rault, J.-L. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 226-232, 27-30 August 2015, Mistelbach, Austria, 2015a.
    • Albin, T., Koschny, D., Drolshagen, G., Soja, R., Poppe, B., and Srama, R.: De-biasing of the velocity determination for double station meteor observations from CILBO, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Rault, J.-L. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 214-219, Mistelbach, Austria, 2015b.
    • Albin, T., Koschny, D., Soja, R., Srama, R., and Poppe, B.: A Monte-Carlo based extension of the Meteor Orbit and Trajectory Software (MOTS) for computations of orbital elements, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Roggemans, A. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 20-25, 2-5 June 2016, Egmond, the Netherlands, 2016.
    • Barentsen, G. and Koschny, D.: The IMO Virtual Meteor Observatory (VMO): Architectural design, Earth Moon Planets, 102, 247-252, 2008.
    • Cooke, W. and Moser, D. E.: The status of the NASA All-Sky Fireball network, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Gyssens, M. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 9-12, 15-18 September 2011, Sibiu, Romania, 2012.
    • Drolshagen, E., Ott, T., Koschny, D., Drolshagen, G., and Poppe, B.: Meteor velocity distribution from CILBO double station video camera dat, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Rault, J.-L. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 16-22, 18-21 September 2014, Giron, France, 2014.
    • Jenniskens, P. Gural, P. S., Dynneson, L., Grigsby, B. J., Newman, K. E., Borden, M., Koop, M., and Holman, D.: CAMS: Cameras for Allsky Meteor Surveillance to establish minor meteor showers, Icarus, 216, 40-61, 2011.
    • Koschny, D. and Diaz del Rio, J.: Meteor Orbit and Trajectory Software (MOTS) - Determining the Position of a Meteor with Respect to the Earth Using Data Collected with the Software MetRec, WGN, 30, 87-101, 2002.
    • Koschny, D., Bettonvil, F., Licandro, J., Luijt, C. v. d., Mc Auliffe, J., Smit, H., Svedhem, H., de Wit, F., Witasse, O., and Zender, J.: A double-station meteor camera set-up in the Canary Islands - CILBO, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 2, 339- 348, doi:10.5194/gi-2-339-2013, 2013.
    • Kretschmer, J., Drolshagen, S., Koschny, D., Drolshagen, G., and Poppe, B.: De-biasing CILBO meteor observational data to mass fluxes, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Rault, J.-L. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 209-213, 27-30 August 2015, Mistelbach, Austria, 2015.
    • Molau, S.: The meteor detection software MetRec, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Arlt, R. and Knöfel, A., IMO, 9-16, 20-23 August 1998, Stará Lesná, 1999.
    • Molau, S.: MetRec - Meteor Recognition Software Version 5.2, available at: http://www.metrec.org/download/readme.txt (last access: 23 February 2017), 2014.
    • Molau, S., Kac, J., Crivello, S., Stomeo, E., Barentsen, G., Goncalves, R., Saraiva, C., Maciewski, M., and Maslov, M.: Results of the IMO Video Meteor Network - April 2015, WGN, Journal of the International Meteor Organization, 43, 115-120, 2015.
    • Ott, T., Drolshagen, E., Koschny, D., Drolshagen, G., and Poppe, B.: Meteoroid flux determination using image intensified video camera data from the CILBO double station, in: Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, edited by: Rault, J.-L. and Roggemans, P., IMO, 23-29, 18-21 September 2014, Giron, France, 2014.
    • Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825-2830, 2011.
    • SonotaCo, T., Molau, S., and Koschny, D.: Amateur contributions to meteor astronomy, European Planetary Science Congress 2010, 20-24 September, Rome, Italy, p. 798, 2010.
    • Weryk, R. J., Campbell-Brown, M. D., Wiegert, P. A., Brown, P. G., Krzeminski, Z., and Musci, R.: The Canadian Automated Meteor Observatory (CAMO): System overview, Icarus, 225, 614-622, 2013.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article