LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gumindoga, W.; Rientjes, T. H. M.; Haile, A. T.; Makurira, H.; Reggiani, P. (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Obtaining reliable records of rainfall from satellite rainfall estimates (SREs) is a challenge as SREs are an indirect rainfall estimate from visible, infrared (IR), and/or microwave (MW) based information of cloud properties. SREs also contain inherent biases which exaggerate or underestimate actual rainfall values hence the need to apply bias correction methods to improve accuracies. We evaluate the performance of five bias correction schemes for CMORPH satellite-based rainfall estimates. We use 54 raingauge stations in the Zambezi Basin for the period 1998–2013 for comparison and correction. Analysis shows that SREs better match to gauged estimates in the Upper Zambezi Basin than the Lower and Middle Zambezi basins but performance is not clearly related to elevation. Findings indicate that rainfall in the Upper Zambezi Basin is best estimated by an additive bias correction scheme (Distribution transformation). The linear based (Spatio-temporal) bias correction scheme successfully corrected the daily mean of CMORPH estimates for 70 % of the stations and also was most effective in reducing the rainfall bias. The nonlinear bias correction schemes (Power transform and the Quantile based empirical-statistical error correction method) proved most effective in reproducing the rainfall totals. Analyses through bias correction indicate that bias of CMORPH estimates has elevation and seasonality tendencies across the Zambezi river basin area of large scale.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from