LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
D. Tadic; A. Aleksic; P. Popovic; S. Arsovski; A. Castelli; D. Joksimovic; M. Stefanovic (2017)
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Journal: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: G, GE1-350, Geography. Anthropology. Recreation, QE1-996.5, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Environmental sciences, Geology, TD1-1066
The evaluation and enhancement of business processes in any organization in an uncertain environment presents one of the main requirements of ISO 9000:2008 and has a key effect on competitive advantage and long-term sustainability. The aim of this paper can be defined as the identification and discussion of some of the most important business processes of seaports and the performances of business processes and their key performance indicators (KPIs). The complexity and importance of the treated problem call for analytic methods rather than intuitive decisions. The existing decision variables of the considered problem are described by linguistic expressions which are modelled by triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs). In this paper, the modified fuzzy extended analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is proposed. The assessment of the relative importance of each pair of performances and their key performance indicators are stated as a fuzzy group decision-making problem. By using the modified fuzzy extended analytic hierarchy process, the fuzzy rank of business processes of a seaport is obtained. The model is tested through an illustrative example with real-life data, where the obtained data suggest measures which should enhance business strategy and improve key performance indicators. The future improvement is based on benchmark and knowledge sharing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aleksic, A., Stefanovic, M., Arsovski, S., and Tadic, D.: An assessment of organizational resilience potential in SMEs of the process industry, a fuzzy approach, J. Loss Prevent Proc., 26, 1238- 1245, doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2013.06.004, 2013.
    • Ali, M. C.: Exploring the potential of integration quality assessment system in construction (qlassic) with ISO 9001 quality management system (QMS), Int. J. Qual. Res., 8, 73-86, 2013.
    • Ali, M. C.: Exploring the potential of integration quality assessment system in construction (qlassic) with ISO 9001 quality management system (QMS), Int. J. Qual. Res., 8, 73-86, 2014.
    • Arsovski, S.: Integrated Management Systems, Kragujevac, Serbia: Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac, Serbia: Faculty of engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, 2013.
    • Balmat, J. F., Lafont, F., Maifret, R., and Pessel, N.: MAritime RISk Assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor, Ocean Eng., 36, 1278-1286, doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.07.003, 2009.
    • Bass, M. S. and Kwakernaak, H.: Rating and Ranking of Multipleaspect Alternatives using Fuzzy sets, Automatica, 3, 47-58, doi:10.1016/0005-1098(77)90008-5, 1977.
    • Chan, F. T. S. and, Kumar, N.: Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHPbased approach, Omega Int. J. Manage. S., 35, 417-431, doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004, 2007.
    • Chang, D. Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95, 649-655, doi:10.1016/0377- 2217(95)00300-2, 1996.
    • Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Decision-making under fuzziness, in: Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, edited by: Gupta, M. M., Pagade, R. K., and Yager, P. R., North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 279-302, 1979.
    • Hsu, W. K.: Port's service attributes for ship navigation safety, Safety Sci., 50, 244-252, 2012.
    • Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A.: Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations, OR Insight, 22, 201-220, 2009.
    • John, A., Paraskevadakis, D., Bury, A., Yang, Z., Riahi, R., and Wang, J.: An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations, Safety Sci., 68, 180-194, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.001, 2014.
    • Kaya, T, and Kahraman, C.: Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Expert Syst Appl, 38, 6577-6585, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.081, 2011.
    • Klir, G. J. and Folger, T.: Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1988.
    • Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C., and Kao, S. S.: A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP, Comput. Ind. Eng., 37, 323-326, doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00084-4, 1999.
    • Kwong, C. K. and Bai, H.: Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach, IEEE Trans., 35, 619-625, doi:10.1080/07408170304355, 2003.
    • Medison, D.: Process Mapping, Process Improvement and Process Management, Paton Professional, California, 2005.
    • Merigo, J. M. and Casanovas, M.: Using fuzzy numbers in heavy aggregation operators, Int. J. Inform. Technol., 4, 267-272, 2008.
    • Oakland, J.: Oakland on quality management, Elsevier ButterworthHeinemann, Oxford, Burlington, 2004.
    • Pak, J. Y., Yeo, G. T., Oh, S. W., and Yang, Z.: Port safety evaluation from a captain's perspective: The Korean experience, Safety Sci., 72, 172-181, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007, 2015.
    • Poli, M., Petroni, D., Pardini, S., Salvadori, A. P., and Menichetti, L.: Implementation of a quality assurance system according to GMP and ISO 9001:2008 standard for radiopharmaceutical production in a public research centre, Accred. Qual. Assur., 17, 341-348, doi:10.1007/s00769-012-0877-3, 2012.
    • Saaty, T. L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1, 83-98, 2008.
    • Sedani, C. M. and Lakhe, R. R.: ISO 9000 QMS & TQM performance measure: Analysis of pilot study, J. Indian Manage. Strat., 16, 59-64, 2011.
    • Shafieezadeh, A. and Burden, L.: Scenario-based resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure systems: Case study for seismic resilience of seaports, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 132, 207-219, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021, 2014.
    • Spiegel, T. and Caulliraux, H. M.: Developing an organizational reference model by selecting and integrating multiple references, J. Manage. Res., 4, 1-23, doi:10.5296/jmr.v4i1.1059, 2012.
    • Tadic, D., Gumus, A. T., Arsovski, S., Aleksic, A., and Stefanovic, M.: An evaluation of Quality Goals by Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology, J. Intel. Fuzzy Syst., 25, 547-556, doi:10.3233/IFS-120659, 2013.
    • Tadic, D., Arsovski, S., Aleksic, A., Stefanovic, M., and Nestic, S.: A Fuzzy Evaluation of Projects for Business Processes' Quality Improvement, in: Intelligent Techniques in Engineering Management, Intelligent Systems Reference Library, edited by: Kahraman, C. and Onar, S. Ç., Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 559-579, 2015.
    • Torfi, F., Farahani, R. Z., and Rezapour, S.: Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives, Appl. Soft Comput., 10, 520-528, doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.021, 2010.
    • Trbojevic, V. and Carr, B.: Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports, J. Hazard. Mater., 71, 467-480, doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00094-1, 2000.
    • Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., and Hua, Z.: On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 186, 735- 747, doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050, 2008.
    • Woo, S. H., Pettit, S. J., Kwak, D. W., and Beresford, A. K. C.: Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s, Transp, Res. A, 45, 667-685, doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.04.014, 2011.
    • Wu, X. Q., Pu, F., Shao, S. H., and Fang, J. N.: Trapezoidal fuzzy AHP for the comprehensive evaluation of highway network programming schemes in Yangtze River Delta, in: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress On Intelligent Control and Automation, 15-19 June 2004, Hangzhou, China, 5232-5236, 2004.
    • Yaqiong, L., Ka Man, L., and Zhang, W.: Fuzzy theory applied in quality management of distributed manufacturing system: A literature review and classification, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 24, 266-277, doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.10.008, 2011.
    • Zimmermann, H. J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, USA, 2001.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article