LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Meier, Claudio I.; Moraga, Jorge Sebastián; Pranzini, Geri; Molnar, Peter (2016)
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: T, G, GE1-350, Geography. Anthropology. Recreation, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Environmental sciences, Technology, TD1-1066
Interannual variability of precipitation is traditionally described by fitting a probability model to yearly precipitation totals. There are three potential problems with this approach: a long record (at least 25–30 years) is required in order to fit the model, years with missing rainfall data cannot be used, and the data need to be homogeneous, i.e., one has to assume stationarity. To overcome some of these limitations, we test an alternative methodology proposed by Eagleson (1978), based on the derived distribution (DD) approach. It allows estimation of the probability density function (pdf) of annual rainfall without requiring long records, provided that continuously gauged precipitation data are available to derive external storm properties. The DD approach combines marginal pdfs for storm depths and inter-arrival times to obtain an analytical formulation of the distribution of annual precipitation, under the simplifying assumptions of independence between events and independence between storm depth and time to the next storm. Because it is based on information about storms and not on annual totals, the DD can make use of information from years with incomplete data; more importantly, only a few years of rainfall measurements should suffice to estimate the parameters of the marginal pdfs, at least at locations where it rains with some regularity.

For two temperate locations in different climates (Concepción, Chile, and Lugano, Switzerland), we randomly resample shortened time series to evaluate in detail the effects of record length on the DD, comparing the results with the traditional approach of fitting a normal (or lognormal) distribution. Then, at the same two stations, we assess the biases introduced in the DD when using daily totalized rainfall, instead of continuously gauged data. Finally, for randomly selected periods between 3 and 15 years in length, we conduct full blind tests at 52 high-quality gauging stations in Switzerland, analyzing the ability of the DD to estimate the long-term standard deviation of annual rainfall, as compared to direct computation from the sample of annual totals.

Our results show that, as compared to the fitting of a normal or lognormal distribution (or equivalently, direct estimation of the sample moments), the DD approach reduces the uncertainty in annual precipitation estimates (especially interannual variability) when only short records (below 6–8 years) are available. In such cases, it also reduces the bias in annual precipitation quantiles with high return periods. We demonstrate that using precipitation data aggregated every 24 h, as commonly available at most weather stations, introduces a noticeable bias in the DD. These results point to the tangible benefits of installing high-resolution (hourly, at least) precipitation gauges, next to the customary, manual rain-measuring instrument, at previously ungauged locations. We propose that the DD approach is a suitable tool for the statistical description and study of annual rainfall, not only when short records are available, but also when dealing with nonstationary time series of precipitation. Finally, to avert any misinterpretation of the presented method, we should like to emphasize that it only applies for climatic analyses of annual precipitation totals; even though storm data are used, there is no relation to the study of extreme rainfall intensities needed for engineering design.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barlow, M., Nigam, S., and Berbery, E. H.: ENSO, Pacific decadal variability, and US summertime precipitation, drought, and streamflow, J. Climate, 14, 2105-2128, 2001.
    • Benjamin, J. R. and Cornell, C. A.: Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
    • Dai, A. G.: Drought under global warming: a review, Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Climate Change, 2, 45-65, 2011.
    • Dai, A. G., Trenberth, K. E., and Qian, T. T.: A global dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870-2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 1117-1130, doi:10.1175/JHM-386.1, 2004.
    • Díaz-Granados, M. A., Valdés, J. B., and Bras, R. L.: A physically based flood frequency distribution, Water Resour. Res., 20, 995- 1002, 1984.
    • Driscoll, E. D., Palhegyi, G. E., Strecker, E. W., and Schelley, P. E.: Analysis of storm event characteristics for selected rainfall gages throughout the United States, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1989.
    • Dufrêne, E., Davi, H., François, C., Le Maire, G., Le Dantec, V., and Granier, A.: Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest. Part I: Model description and uncertainty analysis on modelled NEE, Ecol. Model., 185, 407-436, 2005.
    • Dunkerley, D.: Identifying individual rain events from pluviograph records: a review with analysis of data from an Australian dryland site, Hydrol. Process., 22, 5024-5036, 2008.
    • Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation. 2. The distribution of annual precipitation derived from observed storm sequences, Water. Resour. Res., 14, 713-721, 1978.
    • Falvey, M. and Garreaud, R.: Wintertime precipitation episodes in central Chile: Associated meteorological conditions and orographic influences, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 171-193, doi:10.1175/jhm562.1, 2007.
    • Fatichi, S., and Ivanov, V.: Interannual variability of evapotranspiration and vegetation productivity, Water Resour. Res., 50, 3275- 3294, doi:10.1002/2013WR015044, 2014.
    • Fatichi, S., Ivanov, V. Y., and Caporali, E.: Investigating interannual variability of precipitation at the global scale: Is there a connection with seasonality?, J. Climate, 25, 5512-5523, 2012.
    • Ferguson, T. S., Genest, C., and Hallin, M.: Kendall's tau for serial dependence, Can. J. Stat., 28, 587-604, 2000.
    • Freeze, R. A.: A stochastic-conceptual analysis of rainfall-runoff processes on a hillslope. Water Resour. Res., 16, 391-408, 1980.
    • Gaál, L., Molnar, P., and Szolgay, J.: Selection of intense rainfall events based on intensity thresholds and lightning data in Switzerland, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1561-1573, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1561-2014, 2014.
    • Groisman, P. Y., Knight, R. W., Easterling, D. R., Karl, T. R., Hegerl, G. C., and Razuvavev, V. A. N.: Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record, J. Climate, 18, 1326-1350, 2005.
    • Higgins, R. W., Chen, Y., and Douglas, A. V.: Interannual variability of the North American warm season precipitation regime, J. Climate, 12, 653-680, 1999.
    • Ivanov, V. Y., Bras, R. L., and Vivoni, E. R.: Vegetation-hydrology dynamics in complex terrain of semiarid areas: 1. A mechanistic approach to modeling dynamic feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03429, doi:10.1029/2006WR005588, 2008.
    • Knapp, A. K. and Smith, M. D.: Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production, Science, 291, 481-484, 2001.
    • Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H.: Hydrology for Engineers, 3rd Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 508 pp., 1982.
    • Markovic, R. D.: Probability functions of best fit to distributions of annual precipitation and runoff, Hydrology Paper No. 8, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1965.
    • Masson, D. and C. Frei: Spatial analysis of precipitation in a high-mountain region: exploring methods with multi-scale topographic predictors and circulation types, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4543-4563, doi:10.5194/hess-18-4543-2014, 2014.
    • Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?, Science, 319, 573-574, 2008.
    • Molnar, P., Fatichi, S., Gaál, L., Szolgay, J., and Burlando, P.: Storm type effects on super Clausius-Clapeyron scaling of intense rainstorm properties with air temperature, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1753-1766, doi:10.5194/hess-19-1753-2015, 2015.
    • Onof, C., Mackay, N. G., Oh, L., and Wheater, H. S.: An improved rainfall disaggregation technique for GCMs, J. Geophys. Res.- Atmos., 103, 19577-19586, 1998.
    • Panziera, L., James, C. N., and Germann U.: Mesoscale organization and structure of orographic precipitation producing flash floods in the Lago Maggiore region, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 224-248, doi:10.1002/qj.2351, 2014.
    • Pranzini, G.: Annual rainfall distribution in Concepción as derived from the characteristics of the storm sequence, Thesis presented for the profesional degree of Civil Engineer, Depto. de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile, 2000.
    • Pranzini, G. and Meier, C. I.: Annual rainfall distribution in Concepción as derived from the characteristics of the storm sequence, in Proceedings of the XV Chilean Conference of Hydraulic Engineering, 7-9 November 2001, Concepción, 27-38, 2001.
    • Restrepo-Posada, P. J. and Eagleson, P. S.: Identification of independent rainstorms, J. Hydrol., 55, 303-319, doi:10.1016/0022- 1694(82)90136-6, 1982.
    • Reyer, C. P. O., Leuzinger, S., Rammig, A., Wolf, A. Bartholomeus, R. P., Bonfante, A., de Lorenzi, F., Dury, M., Gloning, P., Abou Jaoude, R., Klein, T., Kuster, T. M., Martins, M., Niedrist, G., Riccardi, M., Wohlfahrt, G., de Angelis, P., de Dato, G., Francois, L., Menzel, A., and Pereira, M.: A plant's perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability, Global Change Biol., 19, 75-89, doi:10.1111/gcb.12023, 2013.
    • Schiesser, H. H., Houze, R. A., and Huntrieser, H.: The mesoscale structure of severe precipitation systems in Switzerland, Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 2070-2097, 1995.
    • Tucker, G. E. and Bras, R. L.: A stochastic approach to modeling the role of rainfall variability in drainage basin evolution, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1953-1964, 2000.
    • Willems, P.: A spatial rainfall generator for small spatial scales, J. Hydrol., 252, 126-144, 2001.
    • Xie, P. P. and Arkin, P. A.: Analyses of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions, J. Climate, 9, 840-858, 1996.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    43
    43%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article