Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Drosoglou, Theano; Bais, Alkiviadis F.; Zyrichidou, Irene; Kouremeti, Natalia; Poupkou, Anastasia; Liora, Natalia; Giannaros, Christos; Koukouli, Maria Elissavet; Balis, Dimitris; Melas, Dimitrios (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
The main issue arising from the comparison of ground-based and satellite measurements is the difference in spatial representativeness, which for locations with inhomogeneous spatial distribution of pollutants may lead to significant differences between the two datasets. In order to investigate the spatial variability of tropospheric NO2 within a sub-satellite pixel, a campaign which was lasted for about six months was held at the greater area of Thessaloniki, Greece. Three DOAS/MAX-DOAS systems performed measurements of tropospheric NO2 columns at different sites representative of urban, sub-urban and rural conditions. The direct comparison of these ground-based measurements with corresponding OMI/Aura and GOME-2/MetOp-A and GOME2/MetOp-B products showed good agreement only over the rural area. GOME2A and GOME2B sensors show an average underestimation of tropospheric NO2 over the urban area of about 9.12 ± 7.33 × 1015 and 9.58 ± 8.21 × 1015 molecules cm−2, respectively. The mean difference between ground-based and OMI observations is significantly lower (6.03 ± 6.04 × 1015 molecules cm−2), mainly due to the higher spatial resolution of OMI. OMI data were adjusted using factors calculated by an air quality modelling tool, consisting of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) mesoscale meteorological model and the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) multi-scale photochemical transport model. This approach resulted to significant improvement of the comparisons over the urban monitoring site. The average negative difference of OMI observations from Phaethon measurements was reduced to 1.15 ± 6.32 × 1015 molecules cm−2.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • EC | QA4ECV

Cite this article

Collected from