OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sirmacek, Beril; Lindenbergh, Roderik; Wang, Jinhu (2016)
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: TA1-2040, T, TA1501-1820, Applied optics. Photonics, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Technology
3D urban models are valuable for urban map generation, environment monitoring, safety planning and educational purposes. For 3D measurement of urban structures, generally airborne laser scanning sensors or multi-view satellite images are used as a data source. However, close-range sensors (such as terrestrial laser scanners) and low cost cameras (which can generate point clouds based on photogrammetry) can provide denser sampling of 3D surface geometry. Unfortunately, terrestrial laser scanning sensors are expensive and trained persons are needed to use them for point cloud acquisition. A potential effective 3D modelling can be generated based on a low cost smartphone sensor. Herein, we show examples of using smartphone camera images to generate 3D models of urban structures. We compare a smartphone based 3D model of an example structure with a terrestrial laser scanning point cloud of the structure. This comparison gives us opportunity to discuss the differences in terms of geometrical correctness, as well as the advantages, disadvantages and limitations in data acquisition and processing. We also discuss how smartphone based point clouds can help to solve further problems with 3D urban model generation in a practical way. We show that terrestrial laser scanning point clouds which do not have color information can be colored using smartphones. The experiments, discussions and scientific findings might be insightful for the future studies in fast, easy and low-cost 3D urban model generation field.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bach, M. and Daniel, S., 2011. Towards a fast and easy approach for building textured 3D models using smartphones. In proceedings of ISPRS Joint Workshop on 3D City Modelling and Applications.
    • Baltsavias, E., 1999. A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 54 (2), pp. 83-94.
    • Belongie, S. and Malik, J.and Puzicha, J., 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24 (4), pp. 509-522.
    • datasheet, L. S. C., 2011. The all-in-one laser scanner for any application. Leica Geosystems Product Datasheet.
    • Friedman, S. and Stamos, I., 2012. Online facade reconstruction from dominant frequencies in structured point clouds. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 1, pp. 1-8.
    • Fritsch, D., Khosravani, A., Cefalu, A. and Wenzel, K., 2011. Multisensors and multiray reconstrcution for digital preservation. In Proceedings of the Photogrammetric Week 2011 1, pp. 305-323.
    • Hartley, R., 1993. Euclidean reconstruction from uncalibrated views. in proceedings of the second European Workshop on Invariants, Ponta Delgada, Azores, Springer-Verlang 1, pp. 187-202.
    • Heidari, A., Alaei Novin, I. and Aarabi, P., 2013. Fusion of spatial and visual information for object tracking on iphone. 2013 16th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) 1, pp. 630-637.
    • Huttenlocher, D. and Ullman, S., 1990. Recognizing solid objects by alignment with an image. International Journal of Computer Vision 5 (2), pp. 195-212.
    • Huttenlocher, D., Klanderman, G. and Rucklidge, W., 1993. Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15, pp. 850-863.
    • Klein, G. and Murray, D., 2009. Parallel tracking and mapping on a camera phone. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'09, Orlando).
    • Koch, R., Pollefeys, M. and van Gool L., 1998. Automatic 3d model acquisition from uncalibrated image sequences. Proceedings of Computer Graphics International B1, pp. 597-604.
    • Laffont, P., Bousseau, A. and Drettakis, G., 2013. Rich intrinsic image decomposition of outdoor scenes from multi views. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19 (2), pp. 210-224.
    • Liu, L., Stamos, I., Yu, G., Wolberg, G. and Zokai, S., 2006. Multiview geometry for texture mapping 2d images onto 3d range data. in proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1, pp. 2293-2300.
    • Sirmacek, B., Shen, Y., Lindenbergh, R., Zlatanova, S. and Diakite, A., 2016. Comparison of zeb1 and leica c10 indoor laser scanning point clouds. XXIII ISPRS Congress, ISPRS Annals, Prague, Czech Republic.
    • Thoeni, K., Giacomini, A., Murtagh, R. and Kniest, E., 2014. A comparison of multi-view 3d reconstruction of a rock wall using several cameras and a laser scanner. ISPRS Technical Commision V Symposium, Riva del Garda, Italy XL-5, pp. 573-580.
    • Turner, E. and Zakhor, A., 2012. Sharp geometry reconstruction of building facades using range data. 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2012, Lake Buena Vista, Orlando, FL, USA 1, pp. 1785-1788.
    • Wang, S., 2012. Integrating sensors on a smartphone to generate texture images of 3D photo-realistic building models. Proceedings of the Global Geospatial Conference 2012, Quebec City.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects


Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok