Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hole, B.; Lin, L.; McCann, P.; Wheatley, P. (2010)
Publisher: 7th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects
Languages: English
Types: Other
Predicting the costs of long-term digital preservation is a crucial yet complex task for even the largest repositories and institutions. For smaller projects and individual researchers faced with preservation requirements, the problem is even more overwhelming, as they lack the accumulated experience of the former. Yet being able to estimate future preservation costs is vital to answering a range of important questions for each. The LIFE (Life Cycle Information for E-Literature) project, which has just completed its third phase, helps institutions and researchers address these concerns, reducing the financial and preservation risks, and allowing decision makers to assess a range of options in order to achieve effective preservation while operating within financial restraints. The project is a collaboration between University College London (UCL), The British Library and the Humanities Advanced Technology and Information Institute (HATII) at the University of Glasgow. Funding has been supplied in the UK by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) and the Research Information Network (RIN).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Shenton, H., “Life Cycle Collection Management”, Liber Quarterly 13:254-272, 2003.
    • [2] Holt, G. E., “Economic Realities in Optimizing Library Materials Access”, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 20(1):45-49, 2007.
    • [3] Robinson, C. K., “Library Space in the Digital Age: The Pressure is on”, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 22(1):5-8, 2009.
    • [4] Jacobs, N., “Institutional Repositories in the UK: The JISC Approach”, Library Trends, 57(2):124- 141, 2008.
    • [5] Seadle, M., “The Digital Library in 100 Years: Damage Control”, Library Hi Tech, 26(1):5-10, 2008.
    • [6] Middleton, K., “Collaborative Digitization Programs: A Multifaceted Approach to Sustainability”, Library Hi Tech, 23(2):145-150, 2005.
    • [7] Shenton, H., “From talking to doing: Digital preservation at the British Library”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614530009516807 (accessed July 11th 2010), New Review of Academic Librarianship, 6(1): 163-177, 2000.
    • [9] Wheatley, P. and Hole, B., “LIFE3: Predicting Long Term Digital Preservation Costs”, http://www.life.ac.uk/3/docs/ipres2009v24.pdf (accessed 11th July 2010), paper presented at iPres 2009.
    • [10] Lavoie, B. and Dempsey, L. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at… Digital Preservation”, D-Lib Magazine, 10(7/8), http://dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html (accessed July 5th 2010), 2004.
    • [11] Ray, J., “Digitization Grants and How to Get One: Advice from the Director, Office of Library Services, Institute of Museum and Library Services”, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 14(2), 2001.
    • [12] Bradley, K., “Defining Digital Sustainability”, Library Trends, 56(1):148-163, 2007.
    • [13] Chapman, S. “Counting the Costs of Digital Preservation: Is Repository Storage Affordable?”, Journal of Digital Information, https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewPDFInterstit ial/100/99 4(2): 1-15, 2004.
    • [14] McLeod, R. and Wheatley, P. and Ayris, P. Lifecycle information for e-literature: full report from the LIFE project. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/1854/ (accessed 11th July 2010), LIFE Project, London, UK, 2006.
    • [15] Ayris, P. and Davies, R. and McLeod, R. and Miao, R. and Shenton, H. and Wheatley, P. The LIFE2 final project report. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/11758/ (accessed 11th July 2010), LIFE Project, London, UK, 2008.
    • [16] Rosenthal, D. S. H., Robertson, T., Lipkis, T., Reich, V. and Morabito, S., “Requirements for Digital Preservation Systems: A Bottom-Up Approach”, arXiv:cs/0509018v2 [cs.DL], 2005.
    • [17] Beagrie, N., Lavoie, B. and Wollard, M., Keeping Research Data Safe 2, http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publication s/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.pdf (accessed 11th July 2010), Charles Beagrie Ltd., 2010.
    • [18] Kejser, U. B., Nielsen, A. B. and Thirifays, A., The Cost of Digital Preservation: Project Report v. 1.0, Danish National Archives and Royal Library, 2009.
    • [19] Thompson, D., “A Pragmatic Approach to Preferred File Formats for Acquisition”, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue63/thompson/ (Accessed July 11th 2010), Ariadne 63, 2010.
    • [20] Rusbridge, C. “Excuse Me… Some Preservation Fallacies?”, Ariadne 46, 2006.
    • [21] Steele, K., “The Fiscal Wonders of Technology”, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 22(4):123-125, 2009.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article