OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
This study focuses on the effect of television on international students of Anglia\ud Ruskin University in terms of English speaking skills, knowledge of British culture, change of\ud the type of food, and also the change of type of music. Thousands of students enter UK every\ud year to study. These students, who come from different parts of the world, speak different\ud languages and also have different culture. It was based on this that the researcher decided to\ud undertake this study to identify the level of influence British television has been able to impact\ud in the lives of the international students. Data were collected from 124 respondents through an\ud online survey. The findings helped to understand the television viewing pattern of international\ud students and the channel mostly viewed by them. The results confirmed that each international\ud student has a need which they sought for gratification of those needs by watching a particular\ud TV programme. The researcher also relates the study with both uses and gratification theory\ud and cultivation theory. These theories formed the theoretical framework of the study. The\ud researcher also made recommendations for the policy makers in the TV industry in UK who\ud would like to produce and broadcast programmes that will not be culturally specific so as to\ud appeal to a large audience of different nationalities. These recommendations, if implemented\ud will go a long way to further improve the British TV industry.\ud KEYWORDS: British television, International student, Uses and gratification, Cultivation\ud theory
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alison, M., 2010. Can TV help you learn a foreign language? [Online] Available at :<>[Accessed 29 June 2014].
    • Anglia Ruskin University, 2012. Institutional review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. [Pdf] Available at :< rsity/Anglia-Ruskin-University-IRENI-12.pdf> [Accessed 19 June 2014].
    • BARB, 2014. Top 10s. [Online] Availbale at :<> [Accessed 25 June 2014].
    • BBC, 2013. News about Britain universities in the UK. [Online] Available at :< iversities.shtml> [Accessed 10 May 2014].
    • Bignell, J., 2013. An Introduction to television studies. 3rd ed. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Bryman, A., 2012. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Cargan, L., 2007. Doing social research. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    • Casey, B., Casey, N., Calvert, B., French, L. and Lewis, J. eds., 2008. Television studies: The key concepts. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Chapin, J. R., 2008. Third-person perception and racism. International Journal of Communication, 2.
    • Cresswell, J. W., 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Douglas, L., 2010. Why do we watch food television? [Online] Available at :<>[Accessed 29 June 2014].
    • Druckman, J. N., 2003. The power of television images: the first Kennedy-Nixon debate revisited. [Pdf] Available at:
    • [Accessed 2 June 2014].
    • Elasmar, M. G., 2003. The Impact of International Television: a paradigm shift.
    • Harris, R. J., and Karafa, J. A., 1999. A cultivation theory perspective of worldwide national impressions of the United States. In Y. R. Kamalipour ed. Images of the U. S around the world. A multicultural perspective. New York: State University of New York Press.
    • Hartley, J., 2006. Television and globalisation: national and international concerns. In G.Creeber, ed., Tele-visions: an introduction to studying television. London: BFI. Ch. 9.
    • Harvey, S., 2000. Channel Four television:From Annan to Grade. In: E. Buscombe, ed. British television: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Katz, E. 1980. On conceptualising media effects. Studies in Communication, 1, 119-141.
    • Kim, S., Agrusa, J., Lee, H. and Chon, K., 2007. Effects of Korean television dramas on the flow of Japanese tourists. [Pdf] Available at :< 0341-713c-4866-a6ed-f0f021875407.pdf> [Accessed 21 May 2014].
    • Kumar, R., 2014. Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Lears, M. O., 1992. The effect of television viewing on children's conceptions about nutrition and health. [Pdf] Available at :<>[Accessed 29 June 2014].
    • Marchessault, J., 2005. Marshall McLuhan: Cosmic media. London: Sage Publications.
    • Marcus, L., 2005. The history of BBC: The first TV era. [Online] Available at :<> [Accessed 12 June 2014].
    • McQuail, D., J. Blumler and R. Brown, 1972. The television audience: a revised perspective in D. McQuail ed. Sociology of Mass Communication. London: Longman.
    • McQuail, D. 1987. Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. London: Sage
    • McQueen, D., 1998. Television: a media student's guide. London: Arnold.
    • Neale, S. and F. Krutnik, 1990. Popular film and television comedy. London: Routledge.
    • Neale, S. and G.Turner, 2001. Introduction: what is genre? In G.Creeber, ed., The television genre book. London: BFI. Ch. 1.
    • OFCOM, n.d. Communications reform. [Online] Availbale at :<> [Accessed 15 July 2014].
    • Oppenheim, A. N., 2006. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publications.
    • Quan-Haase, A. And Young, A. L., 2010. U s e s a n d G r a t i f i c a t i o n s o f S o c i a l M e d i a : A C o m p a r i s o n o f F a c e b o o k a n d I n s t a n t M e s s a g i n . [ o n l i n e ] Available at :< parison_of_Facebook_and_instant_messaging>[Accessed 17 May 2014].
    • Ruddock, A., 2001. Understanding audiences: theory and method. London: Sage.
    • Shattue, J., 1997. The talking cure: TV talkshows and women. London: Routledge.
    • Tal, E., 2013. What do student viewing habits mean for tv? [Online] Available at :<> [Accessed 19 June 2014].
    • Theguardian, 2013. Top 10 documentaries. [Online] Available at :< documentaries>[Accessed 25 July 2014].
    • Thornborrow, J., 2007. Narrative, opinion and situated argument in talk show discourse. [Pdf] Available at :<> [Accessed 30 May 2014].
    • UCAS, 2014. International. [Online] Available at :<> [Accessed 12 May 2014].
    • Wang, D., 2008. Globalization of the Media: Does It Undermine National Cultures? [Pdf] Available at :<> [Accessed 17 May 2014].
    • Wartella, E., & Middlestadt, S. 1991. Mass communication and persuasion: The evolution of direct effects, limited effects, information processing, and affect and arousal models. In D. e. al. (Eds.), Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (pp. 53-69).
    • Welikala, T. and Watkins, C., 2008. Improving intercultural learning experience in higher education: responding to cultural scripts for learning. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
    • Whannel, G., 1990. Winner takes all: competition. In A. Goodwin and G. Whannel, eds., Understanding television. London: Routledge.
    • Wilding, C. M., 2011. Numbers that count: Measuring the BBC World Service global audience. [pdf]Availableat: [Accessed 25 July 2014].
    • Williams, K., 2010. Understanding media theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok