Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cobley, Paul; Semiotic Society of America (2014)
Publisher: Philosophy Documentation Center
Languages: English
Types: Article
The main idea underpinning the position outlined in this paper is a very common one. In fact, it is also quite old: the notion that structure facilitates. The paper attempts to sketch a picture of the human as a sign. In doing so, it also attempts to negotiate an understanding of the human as constituted by ‘selfhood’ on the one hand and by what has become known as ‘subjectivity’, on the other. it attempts to provide one way of approaching the nature/nurture, biology/culture or, also, the structure/agency debates through the investigation of semiosis.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • BAKHTIN, Mikhail (17 November 1895-1975 March 7). 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, trans. and ed. C. Emerson (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1984) from Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo (Moscow, 1963), a much expanded 2nd ed. of Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo (Leningrad, 1929)
    • BENHABIB, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Cambridge: Polity.
    • CASCARDI, Anthony J. 1992. The Subject of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • COBLEY, Paul. 2008. “Signifiers and subjects”, in S. Petrilli ed., Approaches to Communication: Trends in Global Communication Studies, Madison: Atwood Press.
    • CORNWELL, Tim. 1998. “A Stone Age mind-blower”, Times Higher Educational Supplement, 9 January, 17.
    • DANESI, Marcel, and Thomas Albert SEBEOK. 2000. The Forms of Meaning: Modelling Systems Theory, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • DEELY, John. 1994. The Human Use of Signs; or, Elements of Anthroposemiosis, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. 2001. Four Ages of Understanding: The first postmodern history of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the 21st century (Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press). 2003. “The quasi-error of the external world”, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 10.1, 25-46.
    • ELLIOTT, Anthony. 2001. Concepts of the Self (Cambridge: Polity).
    • FOUCAULT, Michel (15 October 1926-1984 June 25). 1975. “Body/power”, in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, ed. C. Gordon (New York and London: Harvester, 1980), 55-62.
    • GIDDENS, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity).
    • GINZBURG, Carlo. 1980. “Clues: Morelli, Freud and Holmes”, History Workshop 9: 5-36.
    • HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood (13 April 1925- ). 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold.
    • HARRIS, Roy. 1988. “Preface: across the no man's land”, in Linguistic Thought in England 1914-1945, ed. R. Harris (London: Duckworth).
    • HERRNSTEIN SMITH, Barbara. 1998. “Is it really a computer? Presumption and oversimplification in Steven Pinker's descriptions of the mind”, Times Literary Supplement, no. 4951 (20 February), 3-4.
    • HIRSCHKOP, Ken. 1999. Mikhail Bakhtin: An Aesthetic for Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    • HOFFMEYER, Jesper. 1993. Signs of Meaning (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
    • HOFFMEYER, Jesper, and Claude EMMECHE, Editors. 1999. Biosemiotica. Special Edition of Semiotica.
    • KRESS, Gunther R. 1993. “Against arbitrariness: the social production of the sign as an foundational issue in critical discourse analysis”, Discourse and Society, 4.2, 169--91. 1996. “Social processes and linguistic change: time and history in language”, in The Communication Theory Reader, ed. P. Cobley (London: Routledge). 1997. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy (London: Routledge). 1999. Early Spelling (London: Routledge).
    • KULL, Kalevi, Guest-Editor. 2001. Semiotica 134-1/4, Special Issue on “Jakob von Uexküll: A Paradigm for Biology and Semiotics”.
    • LACAN, Jacques. 1971a. “Of structure as an inmixing of an otherness prerequisite to any subject whatever”, in The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, ed. R. Macksey, R. and E. Donato (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press). 1971b. “The insistence of the letter in the unconscious”, in The Structuralists: From Marx to Lévi-Strauss, ed. R. and F. DeGeorge (Garden City: Anchor Books). 1977. Écrits: A Selection, trans. A. Sheridan (London: Tavistock). 1993. The Psychoses: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book III 1955-56, ed. J.-A. Miller, trans. R. Grigg (London: Routledge).
    • MERRELL, Floyd. 1996. Signs Grow: Semiosis and Life Processes (London: University of Toronto Press). 2000. Signs for Everybody: Chaos Quandaries and Communication (Toronto: Legas).
    • PETRILLI, Susan, and Augusto PONZIO. 1998. Signs of Research on Signs, special issue of Semiotische Berichte 22.3/4. 2001. Thomas Sebeok and the Signs of Life (Cambridge: Icon). 2005. Semiotics Unbounded: Interpretive Routes through the Open Network of Signs, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    • PICKERING, John. 1999. “The self is a semiotic process”, Models of the Self, ed. S. Gallagher and J. Shear (Exeter: Imprint).
    • PONZIO, Augusto. 2001. “Il segno 'io'”, in Semiotica dell'io, ed. T. A. Sebeok, S. Petrilli and A. Ponzio (Rome: Meltemi).
    • PONZIO, Augusto, and Susan PETRILLI. 2000. Philosophy of Language: Art and Answerability in Mikhail Bakhtin (Toronto: Legas).
    • ROSE, Hilary and Steven, Editors. 2000. Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology (London: Cape).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article