Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Tabet, Marie-Christine (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: HN, HC
This thesis empirically examines whether the neoclassical economic model provides an adequate framework to analyse a couple’s labour supply behaviour in Britain using recent data from the British Household Panel Survey. The thesis comprises three empirical chapters. The first chapter uses the instrumental variable (IV) estimation procedure to model the hours of work of married couples. This approach allows us to test whether some of the assumptions of the neoclassical model (e.g., income pooling and Slutsky properties) are satisfied by the data. In addition, further variables that have been identified as distribution factors in the literature are introduced to the empirical model to assess whether they play a role in explaining a couple’s hours of work. The first chapter only considers couples in which both spouses work. In the second chapter, the sample is amended to include all couples (i.e., those that work and those that do not) and the analysis conducted models a couple’s labour market participation decisions rather than their hours of work. After testing for income pooling and the impact of distribution factors, a further variable, the wife’s mother-in-law work status when the male spouse was aged 14, is introduced into the model. This is done to determine the effect of 'cultural' variables on labour market decisions. In the last chapter, this issue is explored further by explicitly modelling attitudes to a woman’s role in the labour market. This approach uses a bivariate ordered probit model given the ordinal nature of responses to the attitudinal questions and again restricts the analysis to couples only. Finally, gender-role attitudes are introduced to the labour supply framework used in the second chapter in order to evaluate whether beliefs regarding women’s role impact on a couple’s labour market decisions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ransford, H.E and Miller, J. (1983). Race, Sex and Feminist Outlooks. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 46-59.
    • Ransom, M.R. (1987). An Empirical Model of Discrete and Continuous Choice in Family Labor Supply. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 465-472.
    • Rake, E. (2001). Gender and New Labour's Social Policies. Journal of Social Policy, 30(2), 209- 231.
    • Robinson, H. (2003). Gender and Labour Market Performance in the Recovery. In Dickens, R., Gregg, P., and Wadsworth, J. (eds) The Labour Market Under New Labour: The State of Working Britain. (pp. 232-247). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Staiger, D., and Stock, J.H. (1997). Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557-586.
    • Stephan, G. Edward, and Douglas R. McMullin. (1982). Tolerance of sexual non conformity: City size as a situational and early learning determinant. American Sociological Review, 47, 411-415.
    • Stigler, G.J., and Becker, G.S. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 76-90.
    • Shea, J. (1997). Instrument Relevance in Multivariate Linear Models: a Simple Measure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 348-352.
    • Stern, N. (1986). On the specification of labour supply functions in R.W. Blundell and Walker, I. (eds), Unemployment, Search and Labour Supply. (pp.143-189) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Summerfield, C. and Babb, P. (eds) (2003). Social Trends 33. Office of National Statistics.
    • Taylor, M. (ed). with Brice, J., Buck, N., and Prentice-Lane, E. (2005). British Household Panel Survey User Manual Volume A: Introduction, Technical Report and Appendices.Colchester: University of Essex.
    • Thornton, A., Alwin,D.F., and Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and Consequences of Sex-Role Attitudes and Atttitude Change. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 211-227.
    • Thomas, D., Contreras, D., and Frankenberg E. (1997). Distribution of Power within the Household and Child Health. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
    • Tomeh, A.K. (1978). Sex-Role Orientation: An Analysis of Structural and Attitudinal Predictors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40(2), 341-354.
    • Treas, J., and Widmer, E.D. (2000). Married Women's Employment over the Life Course: Attitudes in Cross- National Perspective. Social Forces, 78(4), 1409-1436.
    • Uhrig, S.C.N. (2008). The Nature and Causes of Attrition in the British Household Panel Survey. ISER Working Paper 2008-05.
    • Vanfossen, B.E. (1977). Sexual Stratification and Sex-Role Socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39(3), 563-574.
    • Van Soest, A. (1995). Structural Models of Family Labor Supply: A Discrete Choice. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(1), 63-88.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article