Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ferguson, Kevin; Thomson, Douglas (2017)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Some helicopter manufacturers are exploring the compound helicopter design as it could potentially satisfy the new emerging requirements placed on the next generation of rotorcraft. It is well understood that the main benefit of the compound helicopter is its ability to reach speeds that significantly surpass the conventional helicopter. However, it is possible that the introduction of compounding may lead to a vehicle with significantly different flight characteristics when compared to a conventional helicopter. One method to examine the flight dynamics of an aircraft is to create a linearised mathematical model of the aircraft and to investigate the stability derivatives of the vehicle. The aim of this paper is to examine the stability derivatives of a compound helicopter through a comparison with a conventional helicopter. By taking this approach, some stability, handling qualities and design issues associated with the compound helicopter can be identified. The paper features a conventional helicopter and a compound helicopter. The conventional helicopter is a standard design, featuring a main rotor and a tail-rotor. The compound helicopter configuration features both lift and thrust compounding. The wing offloads the main rotor at high speeds, whereas two propellers provide additional propulsive thrust as well as yaw control. The results highlight that the bare airframe compound helicopter would require a larger tailplane surface to ensure acceptable longitudinal handling qualities in forward flight. In addition, without increasing the size of the bare airframe compound helicopter’s vertical fin, the Dutch roll mode satisfies the ADS-33 level 1 handling qualities category for the majority of the flight envelope.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] J.G. Leishman. Principals of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2006. ISBN 978-0-521-85860-1.
    • [2] W. Johnson. Helicopter Theory. Dover Publications, Inc., 2nd edition, 1994.
    • [3] S.J. Newman. The Foundations of Helicopter Flight. Edward Arnold, London, 1994.
    • [4] A. Filippone. Flight Performance of Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft. Elsevier Ltd., first edition, 2006. ISBN 978-0-7506-6817-2.
    • [5] M.K. Sekula and F. Gandhi. Effects of Auxiliary Lift and Propulsion on Helicopter Vibration Reduction and Trim. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 41(3):645-656, 2004. doi: 10.2514/1.496.
    • [6] R.W. Prouty. Helicopter Performance, Stability, and Control. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Inc., reprint edition, 1990.
    • [7] M. Orchard and S.J. Newman. Some design issues for the optimisation of the compound helicopter configuration. In American Helicopter Society 56th Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, 2000.
    • [8] M.Buhler and S.J. Newman. The Aerodynamics of the Compound Helicopter Configuration. The Aeronautical Journal, 100(994):111-120, 1996.
    • [9] M.J. Hirschberg. Joint Multi-Role Moves Forward. Vertiflite, 60(1):24-26, 2014.
    • [10] M. Orchard and S.J. Newman. The fundamental configuration and design of the compound helcopter. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 217(6):297-315, 2003. doi: 10.1243/095441003772538570.
    • [11] A.M. Moodie and H. Yeo. Design of a Cruise-Efficient Compound Helicopter. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 57(3), 2012. doi: 10.4050/JAHS.57. 032004.
    • [12] H. Yeo and W. Johnson. Optimum Design of a Compound Helicopter. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 46(4), 2009. doi: 10.2514/1.40101.
    • [13] C. Russell and W. Johnson. Exploration of Configuration Options for a Large Civil Compound Helicopter. In American Helicopter Society 69th Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, 2013.
    • [14] G.D. Padfield. Helicopter Flight Dynamics: the Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling. Blackwell Publishing, 2nd edition, 2007. ISBN 13:978-1-4051-1817-0.
    • [15] K.M. Ferguson and D.G. Thomson. Flight dynamics investigation of compound helicopter configurations. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 52(1):156-167, 2014. doi: 10.2514/1.C032657.
    • [16] D.G. Thomson. Development of a Generic Helicopter Mathematical Model for Application to Inverse Simulation. Internal Report No. 9216, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK, 1992.
    • [17] F.D. Kim, R. Celi, and M.B. Tischler. Forward flight trim and frequency response validation of a helicopter simulation model. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 30(6):854- 863, 1993. doi: 10.2514/3.46427.
    • [18] S. Rutherford. Simulation Techniques for the Study of the Manoeuvring of Advanced Rotorcraft Configurations. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, 1997.
    • [19] M.H. Mansur. Development and Validation of a Blade Element Mathematical Model for the AH-64A Apache Helicopter. NASA-TM-108863, 1995.
    • [20] S.S. Houston. Validation of a non-linear individual blade rotorcraft flight dynamics model using a perturbation method. The Aeronautical Journal, 98(977):260- 266, 1994.
    • [21] R. Bradley, G.D. Padfield, D.J. Murray-Smith, and D.G. Thomson. Validation of helicopter mathematical models. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 12(186), 1990. doi: 10.1177/ 014233129001200405.
    • [22] J.D. Anderson. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 4th edition, 2007. ISBN 007-125408-0.
    • [23] E.A. Frandenburgh and R.M. Segel. Model and full scale compound helicopter research. In Helicopter Society 21st Annual, 1965.
    • [24] M. Torres. A Wing on the SA.341 Gazelle Helicopter and its Effects. Vertica, 1(1):67-73, 1976.
    • [25] H.W. Kim, A.R. Kenyon, K. Duraisamy, and R.E. Brown. Interactional Aerodynamics and Acoustics of a Hingeless Coaxial Helicopter with an Auxiliary Propeller in Forward Flight. In International Powered Lift Conference2, London, U.K., 2008.
    • [26] C.N. Keys. Performance Prediction of Helicopters. In W.Z. Stepniewski, editor, Rotor-Wing Aerodynamics. Dover Publications, Inc., 1981.
    • [27] O.E. Sipe and N.B. Gorenberg. Effect of Mach Number, Reynolds Number and Thickness Ratio on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 63A-Series Airfoil Sections. USATRECOM TR 65-28, 1965.
    • [28] M.D. Van Dyke. High-Speed Subsonic Characteristics of 16 NACA Six Series Airfoil Sections. NACA TN 2670, 1952.
    • [29] M.B. Tischler and R.K. Remple. Aircraft and Rotorcraft System Identification. American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2nd edition, 2012. ISBN 1600868207.
    • [30] B.L. Stevens and F.L. Lewis. Aircraft Control and Simulation. John Wiley and Sons, 2nd edition, 2003. ISBN 0-471-37145-9.
    • [31] Anon. Handling qualities requirements for military rotorcraft. Aeronautical design standard ADS-33E-PRF, United States Army Aviation and Troop Command, 2000.
    • [32] J.W. Fletcher, J. Lusardi, M.H. Mansur, D.E. Robinson, D.R. Arterburn, I. Cherepinsky, J. Driscoll, C.S. Morse, and K.F. Kalinowksi. UH-60M Upgrade FlyBy-Wire Flight Control Risk Reduction using the RASCAL JUH-60A In-Flight Simulator. In American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada, 2008.
    • [33] B.B. Blake and I.B. Alansky. Stability and Control of the YUH-61A. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 22(1):2-10, 1977. doi: 10.4050/JAHS.22.2.
    • [34] S.S. Houston. The Gyrodyne - A Forgotten High Performer? Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 52(4):382 - 391, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4050/ JAHS.52.382.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article