LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Davidoff, Jules B.; Warrington, Elizabeth K. (2001)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
We investigated the selective impairment of mirror image discrimination in a patient with bilateral parieto-occipital lesions (FIM). We report a difficulty with the discrimination between mirror images more selective than has been previously reported (Turnbull OH, McCarthy RA. Failure to discriminate between mirror-image objects: a case of viewpoint-independent object recognition? Neurocase 1996;2:63). FIM was asked to judge, in five same/different experiments, whether pairs of simultaneously presented line drawings of objects were identical. FIM demonstrated only a minor impairment in discriminating between orientations in the picture plane but was at chance in making discrimination between mirror images. An experiment with normal observers established that our results were not due to differences in task difficulty. Two further experiments investigated the effects of rotation on the discrimination of letters and geometric shapes. FIM's impairment extended to geometric shapes but not to letters. These results would be consistent with the preservation of an abstract representation for object recognition that did not code the difference between mirror image views.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Ashbridge E, Perrett DI, Oram MW, Jellema T. Effect of image orientation and size on object recognition: responses of single units in the macaque monkey temporal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychol 2000;17:13.
    • [2] Berlin B, Kay P. Basic colour terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
    • [3] Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 1987;94:115.
    • [4] Biederman I, Cooper EE. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 1991;20:585.
    • [5] Bricolo E, Shallice T, Priftis K, Meneghello F. Selective space transformation deficit in a patient with spatial agnosia. Neurocase 2000;6:319.
    • [6] Cooper ACG, Humphreys GW. Task specific effects of orientation information: Neuropsychological evidence. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1607 - 15.
    • [7] Corballis MC. Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychol Rev 1988;95:115.
    • [8] Corballis MC, Beale IL. The psychology of left and right. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.
    • [9] Davidoff J, Warrington EK. The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:279.
    • [10] Davidson HP. A study of the confusing letters b, d, p, q. J Gentic Psychol 1935;47:458.
    • [11] Deregowski JB, McGeorge P, Wynn V. The role of left - right symmetry in the encodement of spatial orientations. Br J Psychol 2000;91:241.
    • [12] Farah MJ, Hammond KM. Mental rotation and orientation-invariant object recognition: dissociable processes. Cognition 1988;29:29.
    • [13] Ferber S, Karnath H-O. Friedrich Best's Case Z with misidentification of object orientation. In: Code C, Wallesch CW, Joanette Y, Lecours AR, editors. Classic cases in neuropsychology, vol. II. East Sussex, Taylor & Francis, in press.
    • [14] Funnell MG, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS. A deficit in perceptual matching in the left hemisphere of a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:1143.
    • [15] Gold M, Adair JC, Jacobs DH, Heilman KM. Right - left confusion in Gerstmann's syndrome: a model of body centred spatial orientation. Cortex 1995;31:267 - 83.
    • [16] Hamm JP, McMullen PA. Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998;24:413.
    • [17] Haywood WG. Effects of outline shape in object recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Perform Percept 1998;24:427.
    • [18] Hinton GE, Parsons LM. Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition 1988;30:1.
    • [19] Humphreys GW, Romani C, Olson A, Riddoch MJ, Duncan J. Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans. Nature 1994;372:357.
    • [20] Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Mem Cognit 1985;13:289.
    • [21] Jolicoeur P. Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Can J Psychol 1989;42:461 published erratum appears in Can J Psychol 1988;43(2): following Table of Contents.
    • [22] Jolicoeur P. Identification of disoriented objects: a dual systems theory. Mind and Language 1990;5:387.
    • [23] Jolicoeur P, Milliken B. Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989;15:200 published erratum appears in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989;15(4):555.
    • [24] Karnath HO, Ferber S, Bulthoff HH. Neuronal representation of object orientation. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1235.
    • [25] Kosslyn SM, Chabris CF, Marsolek CJ, Koenig O. Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992;18:562.
    • [26] Langdon DW, Thompson AJ. Relation of impairment to everyday competence in visual disorientation syndrome: evidence from a single case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:686.
    • [27] Lawson R. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychol Amst 1999;102:221.
    • [28] Lawson R, Humphreys GW. View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996;22:395.
    • [29] Lawson R, Humphreys GW. View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Percept Psychophys 1998;60:1052.
    • [30] Lawson R, Humphreys GW, Jolicoeur P. The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: one manipulation or two? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2000;26:568.
    • [31] Lawson R, Jolicoeur P. The effect of prior experience on recognition thresholds for plane-disoriented pictures of familiar objects. Mem Cognit 1999;27:751.
    • [32] Marr D. Vision. San Francisco: WHFreeman, 1982.
    • [33] Marr D, Nishihara HK. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1978;200:269.
    • [34] McFie J, Piercey MF, Zangwill OL. Visual spatial agnosia associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain 1950;73:167.
    • [35] McMullen PA, Jolicoeur P. The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections. Mem Cognit 1990;18:99.
    • [36] Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
    • [37] Murray JE. Flipping and spinning: spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects. Mem Cognit 1997;25:96.
    • [38] Ratcliff G. Spatial thought, mental rotation and the right cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 1979;17:49.
    • [39] Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. Description of a left/right coding deficit in a case of constructional apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychol 1988;5:289 - 315.
    • [40] Rock I. Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
    • [41] Rollenhagen JE, Olson CR. Mirror-image confusion in single neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Science 2000;287:1506.
    • [42] Rudel RG, Teuber HL. Discrimination of direction of line in children. J Comparat Physiological Psychol 1963;56:892.
    • [43] Rudge P, Warrington EK. Selective impairment of memory and visual perception in splenial tumours. Brain 1991;114:349 - 60.
    • [44] Semmes J, Weinstein S, Ghent L, Teuber HL. Correlates of impaired orientation in personal and extrapersonal space. Brain 1963;86:747.
    • [45] Shepard RN, Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 1971;171:701.
    • [46] Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learning 1980;6:174.
    • [47] Solms M, Kaplan SK, Saling M, Miller P. Inverted vision after frontal lobe disease. Cortex 1988;24:499.
    • [48] Solms M, Turnbull OH, Kaplan-Solms K, Miller P. Rotated drawing: the range of performance, and anatomical correlates, in a series of 16 patients. Brain & Cognition 1998;38:358 - 68.
    • [49] Stankiewicz BJ, Hummel JE, Cooper EE. The role of attention in priming for left - right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998;24:732.
    • [50] Tarr MJ, Bulthoff HH. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995;21:1494.
    • [51] Tarr MJ, Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognit Psychol 1989;21:233.
    • [52] Tarr MJ, Pinker S. When does human object recognition use a viewer-centred reference frame? Psychol Sci 1990;35:567.
    • [53] Turnbull OH. A double dissociation between knowledge of object identity and object orientation. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:567.
    • [54] Turnbull OH, Beschin N, Della SS. Agnosia for object orientation: implications for theories of object recognition. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:153.
    • [55] Turnbull OH, McCarthy RA. Failure to Discriminate between mirror-image objects: a case of viewpoint-independent object recognition? Neurocase 1996;2:63.
    • [56] Turnbull OH, McCarthy RA. When is a view unusual? A single case study of orientation-dependent visual agnosia. Brain Res Bull 1996;40:497.
    • [57] Vannucci M, Viggiano MP. Category effects on the processing of plane-rotated objects. Perception 2000;29:287.
    • [58] Warrington EK, Davidoff J. Failure at object identification improves mirror image matching. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1229.
    • [59] Warrington EK, James M. Visual object recognition in patients with right-hemisphere lesions: axes or features? Perception 1986;15:355.
    • [60] Warrington EK, James M. Visual aperceptive agnosia: a clinicanatomical study of three cases. Cortex 1988;24:13.
    • [61] Warrington EK, James M. The visual object and space perception battery. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Co, 1991.
    • [62] Warrington EK, Rabin P. Perceptual matching in patients with cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia 1970;8:475.
    • [63] Warrington EK, Taylor AM. The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex 1973;9:152.
    • [64] Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale - revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, 1987.
    • [65] Zacks J, Mires J, Tversky B, Hazeltine E. Individual differences in mental spatial transformations. Poster presented at Cognitive Neuroscience, San Francisco, 2000.
    • [66] Zacks J, Rypma B, Gabrieli JD, Tversky B, Glover GH. Imagined transformations of bodies: an fMRI investigation. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:1029.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article