Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Williams, B.; Barnes, J.; Chatterton, T.; Hayes, E. T.; Longhurst, J. (2016)
Publisher: Wessex Institute of Technology Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Globally, poor air quality is the most significant environmental health concern. Across Europe, 400,000 deaths were attributed to air pollution in 2012, whilst in the UK over 50,000 deaths per year are due to a combination of gaseous and particulate matter air pollution. The deadline for achieving the EU limit value for NO2 was the 1st of January 2010, yet the UK remains non-compliant in 38 of 43 zones and agglomerations. As a consequence, in April 2015, the government was ordered by the UK Supreme Court to draw up new air quality plans to achieve the EU limit values in the shortest time possible. In response the UK government consulted on a draft national air quality plan, which estimated compliance with the EU Air Quality Directive by 2020 in all zones and agglomerations except London (compliance by 2025). The plan introduces the concept of a Clean Air Zone (CAZ) to address the non-compliant zones but overall has significant weaknesses in many zones and agglomerations and compliance by 2020 (and 2025 in London) is considered to be overly optimistic. The plan’s predictive models use vehicle emission factors that are not considered representative of actual driving conditions, and transparency in the data underlying vehicle fleet turnover calculations is lacking. The suitability of CAZ as a cornerstone of the plan is of particular concern. This contribution examines new evidence that challenges the robustness of the UK government’s air quality plan. If air quality within the UK is to improve within the shortest time possible, significant improvements in the analysis and proposed solutions will be required.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Vidal, H. Helm, T (2016) Shock figures to reveal deadly toll of global air pollution. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/ jan/16/world-heslth-organisation-figures-deadly-pollution-levels-worldbiggest-cities [accessed 18th January, 2016].
    • World Health Organisation Executive Board (2014) Health and the environment: addressing the health impact of air pollution. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB136/B136_15-en.pdf European Environment Agency (2015) Air quality in Europe - 2015 report. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.
    • Gowers, A.M, Miller, B.G, Stedman, J.R. (2014) Estimating Local Mortality Burdens associated with Particulate Air Pollution. Public Health England, Oxfordshire.
    • Air quality guidelines for Europe. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1987 (WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 23).
    • [6] Chatterton, T., Longhurst, J., Leksmono, N., Hayes, E. T. and Symonds, J. (2007) Ten years of Local Air Quality Management experience in the UK: An analysis of the process. Clean Air and Environmental Quality, 41 (4). pp. 26-31.
    • [7] UK Supreme Court (2015) R (on the application of ClientEarth) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Respondent) [2015] UKSC 28 On appeal from [2012] EWCA Civ 897.
    • [8] Air quality in the UK: plan to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions (2015) Available from: (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/air-qualityin-the-uk-plan-to-reduce-nitrogen-dioxide-emissions) [accessed on 9th May, 2016].
    • [9] Barnes, J. (2016) Independent review of responses to the Defra Draft Air Quality Plan consultation. Consultancy Report for Gatwick Airport Ltd.
    • [10] Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2016) Summary of responses to the government's consultation on draft air quality plans.
    • [11] Air modelling for Defra (2015) Available from: (https://ukair.defra.gov.uk/research/air-quality-modelling?view=modelling) [accessed on 10th May 2015].
    • [12] Michel Vedrenne, Cooke, M., Stedman, J. R., Kent, A.J. (2015) Streamlined PCM Technical Report: Report for Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (project AQ0959).
    • [13] Gatwick Airport Ltd. (2016). A second runway for Gatwick: Air Quality Projections in the London Air Quality Plan. Annex 4.
    • [14] Gatwick Airport Ltd. (2016). A second runway for Gatwick: Air Quality Projections in the London Air Quality Plan. Annex 5.
    • [15] Williams, B (2016). A Technical Review of the Soundness of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs' Final Air Quality Plan. Consultancy Report for Gatwick Airport Ltd.
    • [16] Chatterton, T (2016) A Review of the Incorporation of Vehicle Fleet Dynamics within Defra's Final Air Quality Plan. Consultancy Report for Gatwick Airport Ltd.
    • [17] Holman C, Harrison R, Querol X. (2015). Review of the efficacy of low emission zones to improve urban air quality in European cities. Atmospheric Environment. 111: 161-169
    • [18] Air Quality Bulletin (2015), 116: 8-11.
    • [19] Queen's Bench Division Administrative Court (2016) In the matter of an application for Judicial Review, The Queen on the application of ClientEarth (No 2) versus Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. CO Ref: CO/150812016.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article