Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Johnston, S.F. (2005)
Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q1
Holography, the three-dimensional imaging technology, was portrayed widely as a paradigm\ud of progress during its decade of explosive expansion 1964–73, and during its subsequent\ud consolidation for commercial and artistic uses up to the mid 1980s. An unusually\ud seductive and prolific subject, holography successively spawned scientific insights, putative\ud applications and new constituencies of practitioners and consumers. Waves of forecasts,\ud associated with different sponsors and user communities, cast holography as a field on the\ud verge of success—but with the dimensions of success repeatedly refashioned. This retargeting\ud of the subject represented a degree of cynical marketeering, but was underpinned by\ud implicit confidence in philosophical positivism and faith in technological progressivism.\ud Each of its communities defined success in terms of expansion, and anticipated continual\ud progressive increase. This paper discusses the contrasting definitions of progress in holography,\ud and how they were fashioned in changing contexts. Focusing equally on reputed ‘failures’ of some aspects of the subject, it explores the varied attributes by which success and failure were linked with progress by different technical communities. This important case illuminates the peculiar post-World War II environment that melded the military, commercial and popular engagement with scientific and technological subjects, and the\ud competing criteria by which they assessed the products of science.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abbott, Andrew Delano. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
    • Alexander, Kent. 'Seller Beware.' Holosphere 13 (1985): 10.
    • Allibone, T. E. 'White and Black Elephants at Aldermaston.' Journal of Electronics and Control 4 (1958): 179-192.
    • Benton, Stephen A. 'Hologram Reconstructions with Extended Incoherent Sources', Paper presented at 1969 annual meeting of the Optical Society of America, 1969.
    • --. 'Holography: The Second Decade.' Optics News (1977): 16-21.
    • --. 'Ten Years of White-Light Holography', Paper presented at 'Electrooptics/Laser International 1980', London, UK, 1980.
    • Bjelkhagen, Hans I. 'Holographic Portraits Made by Pulse Lasers.' Leonardo 25 (1992): 443-448.
    • Brand, Stewart. The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT. New York: Viking, 1987.
    • Bringolf, Peter H. 'Holography: A Medium in the Making.' Proceedings of the SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering 2043 (1994): 319-321.
    • Charnetski, Clark. 'The Impact of Holography on the Consumer', Paper presented at EASCON Convention, Washington DC, 1970.
    • Cochran, Gary D., and Robert D. Buzzard. 'The New Art of Holography.' In Science Year: The World Book Science Annual 1967. Chicago: Field Enterprises, 1967, 200-11.
    • Corn, Joseph, ed. Imagining Tomorrow: History, Technology and the American Future. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1986.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article