LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gibson, E L; Booth, D A (2000)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: digestive, oral, and skin physiology, food and beverages, fungi, parasitic diseases, behavior and behavior mechanisms
In a two-bottle choice test, rats drank more of the fluid having a novel odour than that having an odour which had previously been presented in the later part of meals on concentrated maltodextrin solution. Rats are normally more averse to a novel odour than to a familiar odour; therefore, the conditioned reaction to the odour acquired in these circumstances is likely to be an ingestive aversion, rather than merely a lack of preference. Furthermore, this learnt odour rejection was seen only in the second half of the meal, indicating that it is dependent on an ingestion-induced state of repletion. Together then, these observations are evidence that the volume of meals rich in carbohydrate can be controlled by learnt rejection of particular food flavours in the presence of visceral cues specific to repletion (previously dubbed "conditioned satiety"), the only known mechanism by which aftereffects of ingested energy could reduce meal volume.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baker, B.J. & Booth, D.A. (1989). Preference conditioning by concurrent diets with delayed proportional reinforcement. Physiology and Behavior 46, 585±590.
    • Baker, B.J., Booth, D.A., Duggan, J.P. & Gibson, E.L. (1987). Protein appetite demonstrated: learned specificity of protein-cue preference to protein need in adult rats. Nutrition Research 7, 481±487.
    • Berridge, K.C. (1991). Modulation of taste affect by hunger, caloric satiety, and sensory-specific satiety in the rat. Appetite 16, 103±120.
    • Birch, L.L., McPhee, L., Shoba, B.C., Steinberg, L. & Krehbiel, R. (1987). ``Clean up your plate'': effects of child feeding practices on the conditioning of meal size. Learning and Motivation 18, 301±317.
    • Birch, L.L., McPhee, L., Steinberg, L. & Sullivan, S. (1990). Conditioned flavor preferences in young children. Physiology and Behavior 47, 501±505.
    • Blundell, J.E., Cotton, J.R., Delargy, H., Green, S., Greenough, A., King, N.A. & Lawton, C.L. (1995). The fat paradox: fat-induced satiety signals versus high fat overconsumption. International Journal of Obesity 19, 832±835.
    • Booth, D.A. (1972a). Caloric compensation in rats with continuous or intermittent access to food. Physiology and Behavior 8, 891±899.
    • Booth, D.A. (1972b). Conditioned satiety in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 81, 457±471.
    • Booth, D.A. (1976). Approaches to feeding control. In T. Silverstone (Ed.), Appetite and food intake. Pp. 415± 478. Berlin: Dahlem Konferenzen.
    • Booth, D.A. (1977a). Appetite and satiety as metabolic expectancies. In Y. Katsuki, M. Sato, S.F. Takagi, & Y. Oomura (Eds), Food intake and chemical senses. Pp. 317±330 Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
    • Booth, D.A. (1977b). Satiety and appetite are conditioned reactions. Psychosomatic Medicine 39, 76±81.
    • Booth, D.A. (1979). Metabolism and the control of feeding in animals and Man. In K. Brown & S.J. Cooper (Eds), Chemical influences on behaviour. Pp. 79±134. London: Academic Press.
    • Booth, D.A. (1980). Conditioned reactions in motivation. In F.M. Toates & T.R. Halliday (Eds), Analysis of motivational processes. Pp. 77±102. London: Academic Press.
    • Booth, D.A. (1985). Food-conditioned eating preferences and aversions with interoceptive elements: conditioned appetites and satieties. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 443, 22±41.
    • Booth, D.A. (1986). Objective measurement of influences on food choice. Appetite 7, 236±237.
    • Booth, D.A. & Davis, J.D. (1973). Gastrointestinal factors in the acquisition of oral sensory control of satiation. Physiology and Behavior 11, 23±29.
    • Booth, D.A. & Grinker, J.A. (1993). Learned control of meal size in spontaneously obese and nonobese bonnet macaque monkeys. Physiology and Behavior 53, 51±57.
    • Booth, D.A. & Toase, A.-M. (1983). Conditioning of hunger/ satiety signals as well as flavour cues in dieters. Appetite 4, 235±236.
    • Booth, D.A., Gibson, E.L. & Baker, B.J. (1986). Gastromotor mechanism of fenfluramine anorexia. Appetite 7, 57±69.
    • Booth, D.A., Gibson, E.L., Toase, A.-M. & Freeman, R.P.J. (1994). Small objects of desire: the recognition of appropriate foods and drinks and its neural mechanisms. In C.R. Legg & D.A. Booth (Eds), Appetite: neural and behavioural bases. Pp. 98±126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Booth, D.A., Lee, M. & McAleavey, C. (1976). Acquired sensory control of satiation in man. British Journal of Psychology 67, 137±147.
    • Booth, D.A., Lovett, D. & McSherry, G.M. (1972). Postingestive modulation of the sweetness preference gradient in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 78, 485±512.
    • Cabanac, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science 173, 1103±1107.
    • Clifton, P.G., Burton, M.J. & Sharp, C. (1987). Rapid loss of stimulus-specific satiety after consumption of a second food. Appetite 9, 149±156.
    • Davis, J.D. & Smith, G.P. (1990). Learning to sham feed: behavioral adjustments to loss of physiological postingestional stimuli. American Journal of Physiology 259, R1228± R1235.
    • Davis, J.D., Collins, B.J. & Levine, M.W. (1976). Peripheral control of meal size: interaction of gustatory stimulation and postingestional feedback. In D. Novin, W. Wyrwicka, & G.A. Bray (Eds), Hunger: basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Pp. 395 ±408. New York: Raven Press.
    • Davis, J.D., Collins, B.J. & Levine, M.W. (1978). The interaction between gustatory stimulation and gut feedback in the control of ingestion of liquid diets. In D.A. Booth (Ed.), Hunger models. Pp. 109±142. London: Academic Press.
    • Davis, J.D., Smith, G.P. & Miesner, J. (1993). Postpyloric stimuli are necessary for the normal control of meal size in real feeding and sham feeding rats. American Journal of Physiology 265, R888±R895.
    • D'Mello, G.D., Stolerman, I.P., Booth, D.A. & Pilcher, C.W. (1977). Factors influencing flavour aversions conditioned with amphetamine in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 7, 185± 190.
    • Garcia, J., Lasiter, P.S., Bermudez Rattoni, F. & Deems, D.A. (1985). A general theory of aversion learning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 443, 8±21.
    • Gibson, E.L. & Booth, D.A. (1986). Acquired protein appetite in rats: dependence on a protein-specific need state. Experientia 42, 1003± 1004.
    • Gibson, E.L. & Booth, D.A. (1987). Paraventricular noradrenaline injection modulates learned integration of visceral satiety signals and dietary stimuli. Neuroscience Letters Suppl. 29, S97.
    • Gibson, E.L. & Booth, D.A. (1989). Dependence of carbohydrate-conditioned flavor preference on internal state in rats. Learning and Motivation 20, 36±47.
    • Gibson, E.L., Wainwright, C.J. & Booth, D.A. (1995). Disguised protein in lunch after low-protein breakfast conditions food-flavor preferences dependent on recent lack of protein intake. Physiology and Behavior 58, 363 ±371.
    • Hankins, W.G., Garcia, J. & Rusiniak, K.W. (1973). Dissociation of odor and taste in bait-shyness. Behavioral Biology 8, 407±419.
    • Hunt, J.N. (1983). Mechanisms and disorders of gastric emptying. Annual Reviews of Medicine 34, 219 ±229.
    • Le Magnen, J. (1955). La satie t e induite par les stimuli sucre s chez le rat blanc. Comptes Rendus des SeÂances de la SocieÂte de Biologie 149, 1339±1342.
    • Le Magnen, J. (1957). Le me canisme d'e tablissement d'un app eÂtit diffe rentiel pour des re gimes de diverses densite s caloriques. Journal de Physiologie 49, 1105± 1117.
    • Le Magnen, J. (1959). Effets des administration postprandiales de glucose sur l'e tablissement des app eÂtits. Comptes Rendus des SeÂances de la SocieÂte de Biologie 153, 212 ±215.
    • Le Magnen, J. (1963). La facilitation diffe rentielle des reflexes d'ingestion par l'odeur alimentaire. Comptes Rendus des SeÂances de la SocieÂte de Biologie 157, 1165 ± 1170.
    • Lovett, D. & Booth, D.A. (1970). Four effects of exogenous insulin on food intake. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 22, 406± 419.
    • Lucas, F., Azzara, A.V. & Sclafani, A. (1997). Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing. Physiology and Behavior 63, 7± 14.
    • Pelchat, M.L., Grill, H.J., Rozin, P. & Jacobs, J. (1983). Quality of acquired responses to tastes by Rattus norvegicus depends on type of associated discomfort. Journal of Comparative Psychology 97, 140 ±53.
    • Poppitt, S.D. & Prentice, A.M. (1996). Energy density and its role in the control of food intake: evidence from metabolic and community studies. Appetite 26, 153±174.
    • Revusky, S.H. & Bedarf, E.W. (1967). Association of illness with prior ingestion of novel foods. Science 155, 219 ±220.
    • Rogers, P.J. (1999). Interaction between palatability and satiation. (Abstract). Appetite 32, 290.
    • Rolls, E.T., Rolls, B.J. & Rowe, E.A. (1983). Sensory-specific and motivation-specific satiety for the sight and taste of food and water in man. Physiology and Behavior 30, 185± 192.
    • Sclafani, A. (1997). Learned controls of ingestive behaviour. Appetite 29, 153±158.
    • Sclafani, A., Nissenbaum, J.W. & Ackroff, K. (1994). Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety. Physiology and Behavior 56, 331±337.
    • Scott, E.M. & Quint, E. (1946). Self-selection of diet. III. Appetite for B vitamins. Journal of Nutrition 32, 285± 291.
    • Shuford, E.H., Jr. (1959). Palatability and osmotic pressure of glucose and sucrose solutions as determinants of intake. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52, 150±153.
    • Siegel, S. (1974). Flavor preexposure and ``learned safety''. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 87, 1073± 1082.
    • Stellar, E. (1955). Hypothalamic mechanisms in motivated behavior. Acta Psychologica 11, 147± 148.
    • Stubbs, R.J., Johnstone, A.M., O'Reilly, L.M. & Poppitt, S.D. (1998). Methodological issues relating to the measurement of food, energy and nutrient intake in human laboratory-based studies. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 57, 357±372.
    • Swithers Mulvey, S.E. & Hall, W.G. (1992). Control of ingestion by oral habituation in rat pups. Behavioral Neuroscience 106, 710± 717.
    • Swithers, S.E., Westneat, M.W. & Hall, W.G. (1998). Electromyographic analysis of oral habituation in rat pups. Physiology and Behavior 63, 197± 203.
    • Van Vort, W. & Smith, G.P. (1983). The relationships between the positive reinforcing and satiating effects of a meal in the rat. Physiology and Behavior 30, 279±284.
    • Warwick, Z.S. & Weingarten, H.P. (1996). Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: implications for interpreting two-bottle tests. Physiology and Behavior 60, 711±715.
    • Yeomans, M.R. (1996). Palatability and the micro-structure of feeding in humans: the appetizer effect. Appetite 27, 119± 133.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article