LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Estrin, Saul; Mickiewicz, Tomasz; Rebmann, Anna
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: Small Business Economics
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Business, Management and Accounting(all), Economics and Econometrics
We apply prospect theory to explain how personal and corporate bankruptcy laws affect risk perceptions of entrepreneurs at time of entry and therefore their growth ambitions. Previous theories have reached ambiguous conclusions as to whether countries with more debtor-friendly bankruptcy laws (i.e. laws that are more forgiving towards debtors in bankruptcy proceedings) are likely to have more entrepreneurs, or whether, creditorfriendly regimes have positive effects on new ventures via enhanced incentives for the supply of credit to entrepreneurs. Responding to this ambiguity, we apply prospect theory to propose that entrepreneurs do not attach the same significance to different elements of bankruptcy codes—and to explain which aspects of debtor-friendly bankruptcy laws matter more to entrepreneurs. Based on this, we derive and confirm hypotheses about the impact of aspects of bankruptcy codes on entrepreneurial activity using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor combined with data on both personal and corporate bankruptcyregulations for 15 developed OECD countries. We use multilevel random coefficient logistic regressions to take account of the hierarchical nature of the data (country and individual levels). Because entrepreneurs and creditors are sensitive to different elements of the codes, there is scope for optimisation of the legal design of bankruptcy law to achieve both an adequate supply of credit and to encourage high-ambition entrepreneurship.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aidis, R., Estrin, E., & Mickiewicz, T. (2012). Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 119-139.
    • Armour, J. (2001). The law & economics of corporate insolvency: a review. In ESRC Centre for business research working paper 62. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
    • Armour, J., & Cumming, D. (2008). Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship. American Law and Economics Review, 10(2), 303-350.
    • Arrow, K. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham.
    • Audretsch, D. (1991). New-firm survival and the technological regime. The Review of Economics and Statistics., 73(3), 441-450.
    • Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). Survey of behavioral finance, handbook of the economics of finance. New York: Elsevier.
    • Baumol, W. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893-921.
    • Berkowitz, J., & White, M. J. (2004). Bankruptcy and small firms' access to credit. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(Spring), 69-84.
    • Bliese, P. D. (2002). Multilevel random coefficient modelling in organizational research. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: advances in measurement and data analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2009 executive report: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
    • Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 747-767.
    • Brouwer, M. (2006). Reorganization in US and European bankruptcy law. European Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 5-20.
    • Buchanan, J. M. (1979). Cost and choice: an inquiry in economic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Busenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomenon. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994-1003.
    • Cirmizi, E., Klapper, L., & Uttamchandani, M. (2011). The challenges of bankruptcy reform. The World Bank Research Observer, 27(2), 185-203.
    • Claessens, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2005). Bankruptcy around the world: explanations of its relative use. American Law and Economics Review, 7(1), 253-283.
    • Cumming, D. J. (2012). Measuring the effect of bankruptcy laws on entrepreneurship across countries. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 16(1), 80-86.
    • Dally, C. (1994). Bankruptcy in strategic studies: past and promise. Journal of Management, 20(2), 263-295.
    • De Clercq, D., Lim, D. S., & Oh, C. H. (2014). Hierarchy and conservatism in the contributions of resources to entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 507-522.
    • Dew, N., Sarasathy, S., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Affordable loss: behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 105-126.
    • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1-37.
    • Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 299- 329.
    • Djankov, S., Hart, O., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. (2008). Debt enforcement around the world. Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), 1105-1149.
    • Efrat, R. (2002). Global trends in personal bankruptcy. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 76(1), 81-110.
    • Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2011). Institutions and female entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 37(4), 397-415.
    • Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 564-580.
    • Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2016). Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 449-467.
    • Evans, D. S., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 808-827.
    • Fan, W., & White, M. J. (2003). Personal bankruptcy and the level of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 543-567.
    • Foss, N., & Klein, P. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Gartner, W., & Liao, J. (2012). The effects of perceptions of risk, environmental uncertainty, and growth aspirations on new venture creation success. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 703-712.
    • Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 421-440.
    • Gimeno, J., Folta, T., Cooper, A., & Woo, C. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Human entrepreneurial capital and the persistence of firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 750-783.
    • Hart, O. (2000). Different approaches to bankruptcy. Harvard Institute of Economic research paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    • Hayton, J. C., & Cacciotti, G. (2013). Is there an entrepreneurial culture? A review of empirical research. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9-10), 708-731.
    • Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51-61.
    • Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227-244.
    • Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T., (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, http://www. pnas.org/content/early/2014/01/15/1307204111.abstract
    • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
    • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
    • Klapper, L. F., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 591-629.
    • Knight, F. H. (2009). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Kissimmee, FL: Signalman Publishing.
    • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52(July) 1131-1150.
    • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
    • Lee, S.-H., & Yamakawa, Y. (2012). Forgiving features for failed entrepreneurs vs. cost of financing in bankruptcies. Management International Review, 52(1), 49-79.
    • Lee, S.-H., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Bankruptcy law & entrepreneurship development: a real options perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 257-272.
    • Lee, S.-H., Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. (2011). How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 505-520.
    • Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behaviour. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 177-194.
    • Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: an international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392-1419.
    • Levie, J., & Hart, M. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. United Kingdom 2009 Monitoring Report. Strathclyde University and Aston Business School.
    • Levie, J., Autio, E., Acs, Z., & Hart, M. (2014). Global entrepreneurship and institutions: an introduction. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 437-444.
    • Levine, R., & Rubinstein, Y., (2013). Smart and illicit: who becomes an entrepreneur and does it pay? http://ssrn. com/abstract=2314667
    • Li, Y., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 95-111.
    • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications.
    • Maddala, G. S. (2001). Introduction to econometrics. Chichester: Willey.
    • Martin, N. (2005). The role of history and culture in developing bankruptcy and insolvency systems: the perils of legal transplantation. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 28(2), 1-77.
    • Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (1994). Life duration of new firms. Journal of Industrial Economics., 42(3), 227-245.
    • McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forwards: real option reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13-30.
    • McMullen, J., Bagby, D., & Palich, L. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875-895.
    • Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Peng, M. W., Yamakawa, Y., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Bankruptcy laws and entrepreneur friendliness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 517-530.
    • Pinillos, M. J., & Reyes, L. (2011). Relationship between individualist-collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23-37.
    • Pochet, C. (2002). Institutional complementarities within corporate governance systems: a comparative study of bankruptcy rules. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(4), 343-381.
    • Posner, R. (2007). Economic analysis of law. New York: Aspen.
    • Prentice, D., Oditah, F., & Segal, N. (2003). Administration: part II of the insolvency act 1986. In J. S. Ziegel (Ed.), Current developments in international and comparative corporate insolvency law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Reuer, J. J., & Arino, A. (2007). Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 313-330.
    • Reynolds, P. D. (2010). New firm creation: a global assessment of national, contextual, and individual factors. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(5-6), 315-496.
    • Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Chin, N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: data collection design and implementation 1998-2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205-231.
    • Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 243- 263.
    • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
    • Simmons, S. A., Wiklund, J., & Levie, J. (2014). Stigma and business failure: implications for entrepreneurs' career choices. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 485-505.
    • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
    • Sobel, R. (2008). Testing baumol: institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641-655.
    • Stephan, U., Hart, M., Mickiewicz, T., & Drews, C. C. (2015). Understanding motivations for entrepreneurship. BIS Research Paper No. 212.
    • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
    • Troilo, M. (2011). Legal institutions and high-growth aspiration entrepreneurship. Economic Systems, 35(2), 158-175.
    • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
    • van Stel, A., Storey, D., & Thurik, R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2-3), 171-186.
    • Vanacker, T., & Manigart, S. (2010). Pecking order and debt capacity considerations for high growth companies seeking financing. Small Business Economics, 35(1), 53-69.
    • Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 362-375.
    • Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293-309.
    • Wennekers, S., Thurik, R., van Stel, A., & Noorderhaven, N. (2007). Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976-2004. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 133-160.
    • White, M. J. (2001). Bankruptcy procedures in countries undergoing financial crises. In S. Claessens, S. Djankov, & A. Mody (Eds.), Resolution of financial distress: an international perspective on the design of bankruptcy laws: 25-45. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
    • White, M. J. (2007). Bankruptcy law. In M. A. Polinsky & S. Shavell (Eds.), Handbook of law and economics (Vol. 2, pp. 1016-1072). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193-203.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article