Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lo, Kin Hing; Kontis, Konstantinos (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Mechanical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, TL, Civil and Structural Engineering, T1, TA
An experimental study has been conducted to investigate the effects of vane-type vortex generators in affecting the flow pattern of the wake region using a 1:20 scale tractor-trailer model. The de Haviland wind tunnel of the University of Glasgow was employed in this study. Surface oil flow visualisation, smoke visualisation and two-component time-averaged particle image velocimetry measurements were used for flow diagnostics. Experimental data showed that putting the vortex generators near the front end of the trailer model could reduce the size of the vortex in the wake region. In addition, it was observed that the use of the vane-type vortex generators at the front of the trailer model might change the shear layer angle so that a smaller wake region was formed downstream of the trailer. No obvious effects of wake flow control could be observed by placing the vortex generators near the rear end of the trailer model. Finally, it was found that the vane-type vortex generator with the vane height of 6 mm is more effective in achieving wake flow control than the one with the vane height of 4 mm.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Transport Statistics Great Britain, 2015. Department of Transport 2015. United Kingdom Government, United Kingdom.
    • Bradley, R., 2000. Technology Roadmap for the 21st Century Truck Program. Technical Report 21 CT-001, United States Department of Energy, Washington DC, United States.
    • Altaf, A., Omar, A.A., Asrar, W., 2014. Passive drag reduction of square back road vehicles. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 134, 30-43.
    • Hsu, F.-H., Davis, R.L., 2010. Drag reduction of tractor-trailers using optimized add-on devices. J. Fluid Eng. 132, 0845041-0845046.
    • Hucho, W.-H., Sovran, G., 1993. Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 485-537.
    • Sovran, G., Morel, T., Mason, W.T., Jr., 1978. Aerodynamic drag mechanism of bluff bodies and road vehicles 1st ed.. Springer, US, United States, 7-44.
    • European Commission Transport Emissions Regulation Webpage. 〈http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/air/transport/road.htm〉 (Date of Visit: 12 October, 2016).
    • Cooper, K.R., 2003. Truck aerodynamics reborn-lessons from the past. SAE Tech. Pap., 2003-01-3376.
    • Choi, H., Lee, J., Park, H., 2014. Aerodynamics of heavy vehicles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 441-468.
    • Buil, R.M., Herrer, L.C., 2009. Aerodynamic analysis of a vehicle tanker. J. Fluid Eng. 131, 0412041-004120417.
    • Wood, R.M., Bauer, X.S., 2003. Simple and low-cost aerodynamic drag reduction devices for tractor-trailer trucks. SAE Tech. Pap., 2003-01-3377.
    • Storms, B.L., Ross, J.C., Heineck, J.T., Walker, S.M., Driver, D.M., Zilliac, G.G., 2001. An experimental study of the ground transportation system (GTS) model in the NASA Ames 7- by 10-ft wind tunnel NASA/TM-2001-209621 Technical report of National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, Washington, DC, United States.
    • Wood, R.M., 2006. A discussion of a heavy truck advanced aerodynamic trailer system. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Presented at the International Forum of Road Transport Technology (IFRTT); June 18-22 2006, Pennsylvania State University, State Colleague Pennsylvania, United States
    • Gillieron, P., Kourta, A., 2010. Aerodynamic drag reduction by vertical splitter plates. Exp. Fluids 48, 1-16.
    • Balkanyi, S.R., Bernal, L.P., Khalighi, B., 2002. Analysis of the near wake of bluff bodies in ground proximity. ASME Pap., 2002-32347.
    • Verzicco, R., Fatica, M., Iaccarino, G., Moin, P., Khalighi, B., 2002. Large eddy simulation of a road vehicle with drag-reduction devices. AIAA J. 40, 2447-2455.
    • Yi, W., 2007. Drag Reduction of a Three-Dimensional Car Model Using Passive Control Device (Ph.D. thesis). Seoul National University, Korea.
    • Peterson, R.L., 1981. Drag reduction obtained by the addition of a boattail to a box shaped vehicle.. Technical report of National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA-CR-163113. NASA, Washington, DC, United States.
    • Croll, R.H., Gutierrez, W.T., Hassan, B., Suazo, J.E., Riggins, A.J., 1996. Experimental investigation of the ground transportation system (GTS) project for heavy vehicle drag reduction. SAE Tech.Pap., paper no. 960907.
    • Englar, R.J., 2001. Advanced aerodynamic devices to improve the performance, economics, handling and safety of heavy vehicles. SAE Tech. Pap., 2001-01-2072.
    • Littlewood, R.P., Passmore, M.A., 2012. Aerodynamic drag reduction of a simplified squareback vehicle using steady blowing. Exp. Fluids 53, 519-529.
    • Howell, J., Sheppard, A., Blakemore, A., 2003. Aerodynamic drag reduction for a simple bluff body using base bleed. SAE Tech. Pap., 2003-01-0995.
    • Leuschen, J., Cooper, K.R., 2006. Full-scale wind tunnel tests of production and prototype, second-generation aerodynamic drag-reducing devices for tractor-trailers. SAE Tech. Pap., 2006-01-3456.
    • Patten, J., McAuliffe, B., Mayda, W., Tanguay, B., 2012. Review of Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Devices for Heavy Trucks and BusesTechnical Report of National Research Council Canada. Center for Surface Transportation Technology, Ottawa, Canada, CSTT-HVC-TR-205.
    • Mugnaini, C.M., 2015. Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of a tractor-trailer using vortex generators: a computational fluid dynamic study (Master of Science thesis). California State University, Sacramento, United States.
    • Correale, G., 2015. Flow control over a backward facing step by ns-DBD plasma actuator. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Aviation, 22-26 June 1983. Dallas, TX, United States.
    • Taubert, L., Wygnanshi, I., 2007. Preliminary experiments applying active flow control to a 1/24th scale model of a semi-trailer truck. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles II: Trucks, Buses and Trains, 26-31 August 2007. Lake Tahoe, California, United States.
    • Ortega, J., Salari, K., Storms, B., 2007. Investigation of tractor base bleeding for heavy vehicle aerodynamic drag reduction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles II: Trucks, Buses and Trains, 26-31 August 2007. Lake Tahoe, California, United States.
    • Lo, K.H., 2014. Experimental Studies on Contour Bumps and Cavities at Supersonic Speed. (Ph.D. thesis). University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
    • Lo, K.H., Zare-Behtash, H., Kontis, K., 2016. Control of Flow Separation on a Contour Bump by Jets in a Mach 1.9 Freestream: an Experimental Study. Acta Astronautica 126, 229-242.
    • Lusk, T., Cattafesta, L., Ukeiley, L., 2012. Leading edge slot blowing on an open cavity in supersonic flow. Exp. Fluid 53, 187-199.
    • Hucho, W.-H., 1998. Commercial vehicles. In: Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles4th ed.. SAE International, Warrendale, PA, United States, 473.
    • Fujimoto, T., Miyake, N., Watanabe, Y., Takeyama, T., 1992. Suppression of mud adhesion to the rear surface of a van-type truck. SAE Tech. Pap., 920203.
    • Lajos, T., Hegel, I., 1994. Some experiments of ground simulation with moving belt. In: Proceedings of the Vehicle Aerodynamics Conference, 18-19 July 1994. Loughborough, United Kingdom.
    • Wood, R., 2012. A review of reynolds number effects on the aerodynamics of commercial ground vehicles. SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 5, 628-639.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article