Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Muller, M; Fairlie-Clarke, A.C. (2003)
Publisher: Elsevier Science B.V.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: TS
Many companies still do not achieve the success rates they desire with new product introductions to the market. A method has been developed to aid companies to self-evaluate their product development processes (PDP). The method meets an identified need for a non-prescriptive procedure to evaluate an existing or proposed PDP at a detailed level, both in the context of the company's own products, processes, procedures and markets, and in the context of accepted good practice. \ud The specification and development of the process and facilities needed for the manufacture of a product are identified as fundamental generic issues within the PDP that must be handled effectively to achieve successful product outcomes. The paper describes the main constructs of the evaluation method in relation to manufacturing issues, and presents results and findings from trials conducted in industry. It is seen that great care is needed to ensure that company practitioners make objective assessments of the important factors. Further work is planned to develop the method as an interactive computer tool and to conduct more trials.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] R.G. Cooper, European Journal of Marketing, 14 (1980) 277-292.
    • [2] Griffin and A.L. Page, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13 (1996) 478-496.
    • [3] J. Poolton and I. Barclay, Industrial Marketing Management, 27 (1998) 197-212.
    • [4] R.G. Cooper, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16 (1999) 115-133.
    • [5] S. Caulkin, Management Today, March (1997) 33-36.
    • [6] M. Coles, Think Twice Before Hiring Consultants. The Sunday Times, 6 December (1998) 26.
    • [7] A.C. Fairlie-Clarke and M.H. Muller, 12th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), (1999).
    • [8] R.G. Cooper, Journal of Marketing, 43 (1979) 93-103.
    • [9] M.A.Maidique and B.J. Zirger, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-31 (1984) 192-203.
    • [10] M.M. Montoya-Weiss and R. Calantone, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11 (1994) 397-417.
    • [11] M.H. Muller and A.C. Fairlie-Clarke, Sixth International Product Development Conference, Cambridge, (1999).
    • [12] Softech, Inc. Integrated Computer-Aided Manufacturing (ICAM Architecture Part II): Volume IV - Function Modelling Manual (IDEF0). Ohio: US Airforce Systems Command, (1981).
    • [13] J. Harrington, Jnr., Understanding the manufacturing process, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1984).
    • [14] C.L. Ang, M. Luo and R.K.L. Gay, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 5 (1994) 79-92.
    • [15] A.C. Fairlie-Clarke and M.H. Muller, Journal of Engineering Design, (under review).
    • [16] Song, M.M. Montoya-Weiss and J.B. Schmidt, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14 (1) (1997) 35-47.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article