Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Frith, Lucy; Draper, Heather (2017)
Publisher: CUP
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: BJ

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: GeneralLiterature_REFERENCE(e.g.,dictionaries,encyclopedias,glossaries)
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ashcroft, R. 2008. Fair Process and the Redundancy of Bioethics: A Polemic. Public Health Ethics. 1(1)3-9.
    • Bennett, R., Cribb, A. 2003. The Relevance of Empirical Research to Bioethics: Reviewing the Debate. In Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, M. Hayry, T. Takala (eds). Amsterdam: Rodopi. 9-18.
    • Bosk, C. 1992. All God's Mistakes: Genetic Counselling in a Pediatric Hospital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Brody, B. 1993. Assessing Empirical Research in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine. 14:211-219.
    • Frith, L. 2009. Process and Consensus - Ethical Decision-Making in the Infertility Clinic: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Ethics. 35(11): 662-667.
    • Gesang, B. 2010. Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts? Bioethics. 24(4):153-159.
    • Green, R.M. 1990. Methods in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 15(2):179- 197.
    • Greenhalgh, T., et al. 2016. An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ. 2016(352):i563.
    • Haimes, E., Williams, R. 2007. Sociology, Ethics, and the Priority of the Particular: Learning from a Case Study of Genetic Deliberations. The British Journal of Sociology. 58(3)457-476.
    • Herrera, C. 2008. Is It Time for Bioethics to Go Empirical? Bioethics. 22(3):137-146.
    • Hurst, S. 2010. What Empirical Turn in Bioethics? Bioethics. 29(8):439-444.
    • Ives, J. 2014. A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics. Bioethics. 28(6):302-312.
    • Ives, J., Draper, H. 2009. Appropriate Methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It's All Relative. Bioethics. 23:249-258.
    • Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., Watson, P. 1998. Qualitative Research Methods in Health Technology Assessment: A Review of the Literature. Health Technology Assessment. 2:(16).
    • Pierce, S.J. 1991. Subject Areas, Disciplines, and the Concept of Authority. Library and Information Science Research. 13(1):21-35.
    • Research Councils UK. 2014. Applications across Research Council Remits, www.rcuk.ac.uk/funding/fundingagreement/ (accessed April 2014).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article