Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Teater, Barbra; Lefevre, Michelle; Mclaughlin, Hugh (2018)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: L
Summary: The research activity of social work academics in the UK has been of interest and concern amongst academics and research funders. Multiple initiatives have been implemented to develop social work research activity, yet research by social work academics remains limited, hindered by lack of time, support infrastructures, funding and training. Through the use of a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey (Nā€‰=ā€‰200) and follow-up individual interviews (Nā€‰=ā€‰11), this study reports on the factors that were found to contribute to or impede the amount of time that social work academics reported spending on research.\ud \ud Findings: The results from the survey indicated that 73% of respondents were research active. Bivariate analysis revealed that academics spent less time on research and teaching, and more time on administration than expected by their employing universities. Multivariate analysis found that less time spent on administration and teaching, more university supports, and being from a pre-1992 university predicted more time spent on research.\ud \ud Applications: The findings indicate that the administrative burdens associated with teaching and assessment in social work education result in academics struggling to fit research into their busy lives, despite initiatives to raise the profile and productivity of social work research. Research support infrastructures and strategies should be reviewed in light of such findings.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis is psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    • Bywaters, P. (2008). Research strategy for social work in the UK. British Journal of Social Work, 38(5), 936-952. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm070.
    • Croisdale-Appleby, D. (2014). Reforming the education of social workers: Part two, Department of Health. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/social-work-education-review.
    • Economic and Social Research Council [ESRC] (2012). Making social work count: A national curriculum development programme pioneered in three universities. ESRC. Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/ES.J011835.1/read.
    • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    • Green, R. G. (2008). Tenure and promotion decisions: The relative importance of teaching, scholarship, and service. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 117-127. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700003
    • Green, R. G., & Baskind, F. R. (2007). The second decade of the faculty publication project: Journal article publications and the importance of faculty scholarship. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(2), 281-295. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2007.200600050
    • Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (2012). Standards of proficiency: Social workers in England. Retrieved from http://www.hpcuk.org/assets/documents/10003b08standardsofproficiencysocialworkersinengland.pdf.
    • Holley, L. C., & Young, D. S. (2005). Career decisions and experiences of social work faculty: A gender comparison. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 297-313. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2005.200303115
    • Joint University Council Social Work Education Committee [JUCSWEC] (2006). A social work research strategy in higher education 2006 - 2020. Retrieved from http://www.juc.ac.uk/docs/strategy_JUCSWEC.pdf.
    • Jones, S., Loya, M. A., & Furman, R. (2009). The perceptions of social work junior faculty about the relationship between scholarship and various workload demands. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 14(1), 15-30. doi: 10.5555/basw.14.1.r13671531q510653.
    • Jordan, S. M. (1994). What we have learned about faculty workload: The best evidence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 83, 15-23. doi: 10.1002/ir.37019948304.
    • MacIntyre, G., & Paul, S. (2013). Teaching research in social work: Capacity and challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 685-702. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs010.
    • Marsh, P. & Fisher, M. in collaboration with Mathers, N., & Fish, S. (2005). Developing the evidence base for social work and social care practice. Retrieved from http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/reports/report10.asp.
    • McLaughlin, H., Lawson, J., & Shardlow, S. M. (2007).Comparing the 1996 and 2001 research selectivity exercise in respect of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 26(2), 109-120. Doi: 10.1080/02615470601042615.
    • Mills, D. Jepson, A. Coxon, T. Easterby-Smith, M. Hawkins, P., & Spencer, J. (2006). Demographic review of the UK social sciences. Retrieved from http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/278774.pdf.
    • Moriarty, J. Manthorpe, J. Stevens, M., & Hussein, S. (2015). Educators or researchers? Barriers and facilitators to undertaking research among UK social work academics. British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1659-1677. doi:0.1093/bjsw/bcu077.
    • Moriarty, J. Stevens, M. Manthorpe, J., & Hussein, S. (2008). Part 2: An audit of research capacity among social work academics. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policyinstitute/scwru/pubs/2008/moriartyetal2008audit-researchcapacity.pdf.
    • Orme, J., & Powell, J. (2008). Building research capacity in social work: Process and Issues. British Journal of Social Work, 38(5), 988-1008. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm122.
    • Powell, J., & Orme, J. (2011). Increasing the confidence and competence of social work researchers: What works? British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1566-1585. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr027.
    • Quality Assurance Agency [QAA] (2008). Subject benchmark statement: Social work. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subjectbenchmark-statement-Social-work.pdf.
    • Seaberg, J. R. (1998). Faculty reports of workload: Results of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 7-19. doi: 10.1080/10437797.1998.10778901.
    • Sharland, E. (2009). Summary report to the Economic and Social Research Council training and development board (Strategic Advisor for Social Work and Social Care Research). Retrieved from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=strategic-adviser-forsocial-work-and-social-care-research-sharland-2009.pdf&site=27.
    • Sharland, E., & Teater, B. (2016). Research teaching and learning in qualifying social work education. In I. Taylor, M. Bogo, M. Lefevre, & Teater, B. (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Education (pp. 144-156). Oxford: Routledge.
    • Shaw, I. F., Arksey, H., & Mullender, A. (2006). Recognizing social work. British Journal of Social Work, 36(2), 227-246. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch251.
    • Taylor, I. (2015). What does the REF tell us about social work research? Retrieved from http://www.apsw.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/APSW-REF-presentationImogen-Taylor-22-1-15-Slides-only.pdf.
    • Wilson, G., & Campbell, A. (2013). Developing social work education: Academic perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 43(5), 1005-1023. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs038.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article