LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Perrotta, C; Williamson, B
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This paper argues that methods used for the classification and measurement of online education are not neutral and objective, but involved in the creation of the educational realities they claim to measure. In particular, the paper draws on material semiotics to examine cluster analysis as a ‘performative device’ that, to a significant extent, creates the educational entities it claims to objectively represent through the emerging body of knowledge of Learning Analytics (LA). It also offers a more critical and political reading of the algorithmic assemblages of LA, of which cluster analysis is a part. Our argument is that if we want to understand how algorithmic processes and techniques like cluster analysis function as performative devices, then we need methodological sensibilities that consider critically both their political dimensions and their technical-mathematical mechanisms. The implications for critical research in educational technology are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agamben, G. 2009. What is an Apparatus? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Aldenferder, M. S., and R. K. Blashfield. 1984. Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    • Barber, M. 2014. “Foreward.” In Impacts of the Digital Ocean, edited by K. E. DiCerbo, and J. T. Behrens, V-VI. Austin, TX: Pearson.
    • Beer, D. 2013. Popular Culture and New Media: The Politics of Circulation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Berger, R. 2013. “Knewton CEO and Founder Jose Ferreira Talking about Knewton's Big Step into Personalized Learning.” EdTech Review, October 23. http://bit.ly/1KTVuZc.
    • Bonner, R. 1964. “On Some Clustering Techniques.” IBM Journal of Research and Development 8 (1): 22-32.
    • Bowker, G., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Callon, M., ed. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell; Keele: The Sociological Review.
    • Callon, M. 2007. “What Does it Mean to Say that Economics is Performative?” In Do Economists make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 311-357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Campbell, John P., Peter B. De Blois, and Diana G. Oblinger. 2007. “Academic Analytics: A New Tool for a New Era.” Educause Review 42 (4): 40-57.
    • Cattell, R. B. 1945. “The Principal Trait Clusters for Describing Personality.” Personality Bulletin 42: 129-161.
    • Clow, D. 2013. “An Overview of Learning Analytics.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (6): 683-695.
    • Crook, C. 1996. Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge, Psychology Press.
    • Del Valle, R., and Duffy, T. M. 2009. “Online Learning: Learner Characteristics and Their Approaches to Managing Learning.” Instructional Science 37 (2): 129-149.
    • Dolnicar, S. 2003. “Using Cluster Analysis for Market Segmentation-typical Misconceptions, Established Methodological Weaknesses and Some Recommendations for Improvement.” University of Wollongong Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/139.
    • Estivill-Castro, V. 2002. “Why so Many Clustering Algorithms: A Position Paper.” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 4 (1): 65-75.
    • Ferguson, R., and D. Clow. 2015. “Examining Engagement: Analysing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).” Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on LA and Knowledge, ACM, 51-58, March 16-20.
    • Field, A. 2000. “Cluster Analysis.” Postgraduate Statistics. http://www.statisticshell.com/docs/cluster.pdf.
    • Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Foucault, M. 1980. The Confession of the Flesh. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
    • Garcia-Parpet, M.-F. 2007. “The Social Construction of a Perfect Market: The Strawberry Auction at Fontaines-enSologne.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 20-53. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Gillespie, T. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, and K. A. Foot, 167-193. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Halkidi, M., Y. Batistakis, and M. Vazirgiannis. 2001. “On Clustering Validation Techniques.” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 17 (2): 107-145.
    • Hope, A. 2015. “Foucault's Toolbox: Critical Insights for Education and Technology Researchers.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (4): 536-549. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.953546.
    • Hung, J. L., and K. Zhang. 2008. “Revealing Online Learning Behaviors and Activity Patterns and Making Predictions with Data Mining Techniques in Online Teaching.” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 4 (4): 426- 437.
    • Kitchin, R. 2014. “Thinking Critically about and Researching Algorithms.” The Programmable City working paper 5. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2515786.
    • Kizilcec, R. F., C. Piech, and E. Schneider. 2013. “Deconstructing Disengagement: Analysing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses.” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on LA and Knowledge, Leuven, Belgium, ACM, 170-179, April 08-12.
    • Latour, B. 1996. On Actor-network Theory: A Few Clarifications. Soziale Welt 47. Jahrg., H. 4, 369-381.
    • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory by Bruno Latour, Vol. 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Laurillard, D. 2009. “The Pedagogical Challenges to Collaborative Technologies.” International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning 4 (1): 5-20.
    • Law, J. 2009. “Actor-network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by B. S. Turner, 141-158. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2005. “Object Lessons.” Organization 12 (3): 331-355.
    • MacKenzie, D. 2004. “The Big, Bad Wolf and the Rational Market: Portfolio Insurance, the 1987 Crash and the Performativity of Economics.” Economy and Society 33 (3): 303-334.
    • Mackenzie, A. 2006. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. New York: Peter Lang.
    • Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2014. Learning from Big Data: The Future of Education. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co.
    • Ozga, J. 2009. “Governing Education through Data in England: From Regulation to Self-evaluation.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (2): 149-162.
    • Ozga, J. 2016. “Trust in Numbers? Digital Education Governance and the Inspection Process.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (1): 69-81.
    • Ozga, J., C. Segerholm, and M. Lawn. 2015. “The History and Development of Inspectorates in England, Sweden and Scotland.” In Governing by Inspection, edited by S. Grek, and J. Lindgren, 68-74. London: Routledge.
    • Pea, R. 2014. A Report on Building the Field of LA for Personalized Learning at Scale. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
    • Pearson College London. 2015. “Intelligence Unleashed: How Smarter Digital Tools can Improve Learning.” Pearson College London, September 7. https://www.pearsoncollegelondon.ac.uk/subjects/business-school/news/2015/09/ intelligence-unleashed.html.
    • Perrotta, C., L. Czerniewicz, and H. Beetham. 2015. “The Rise of the Video-recorder Teacher: The Sociomaterial Construction of an Educational Actor.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 1-17. doi:10.1080/01425692. 2015.1044068.
    • Piety, P. J., D. T. Hickey, and M. J. Bishop. 2014. “Educational Data Sciences - Framing Emergent Practices for Analytics of Learning, Organizations and Systems.” LAK '14, March 24-28, Indianapolis, IN, USA. http://bit.ly/ 1KTVZ5s.
    • Roberts-Mahoney, H., A. J. Means, and M. J. Garrison. 2016. “Netflixing Human Capital Development: Personalized Learning Technology and the Corporatization of K-12 Education.” Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/ 02680939.2015.1132774.
    • Rousseeuw, P. J. 1987. “Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53-65.
    • Ruppert, E., J. Law, and M. Savage. 2013. “Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (4): 22-46.
    • Savage, M. 2013. “The 'Social Life of Methods': A Critical Introduction.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (4): 3-21.
    • Savage, M., and R. Burrows. 2007. “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.” Sociology 41 (5): 885-899.
    • Selwyn, N. 2010. “Looking Beyond Learning: Notes Towards the Critical Study of Educational Technology.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (1): 65-73.
    • Serçe, F. C., K. Swigger, F. N. Alpaslan, R. Brazile, G. Dafoulas, and V. Lopez. 2011. “Online Collaboration: Collaborative behavior Patterns and Factors Affecting Globally Distributed Team Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (1): 490-503.
    • Siemens, G. 2013. “Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (10): 1380- 1400.
    • Spiegel, J. R., M. T. McKenna, G. S. Lakshman, and P. G. Nordstrom, Amazon Technologies, Inc. 2012. Method and system for anticipatory package shipping. U.S. Patent 8,271,398.
    • Steinley, D. 2006. “K-means Clustering: A Half-century Synthesis.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 59 (1): 1-34.
    • Tryon, R. C. 1939. Cluster Analysis: Correlation Profile and Orthometric (Factor) Analysis for the Isolation of Unities in Mind and Personality. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers.
    • Uprichard, E. 2009. “Introducing Cluster Analysis: What it can Teach Us about the Case.” In Byrne and Ragin's Sage Handbook of Case Based Methods, edited by D. Byrne, and C. C. Ragin, 132-147. London: Sage.
    • Uprichard, E., R. Burrows, and D. Byrne. 2008. “SPSS as an 'Inscription Device': From Causality to Description?” The Sociological Review 56 (4): 606-622.
    • Wegerif, R. 2007. Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning (Vol. 7). Berlin: Springer.
    • Williamson, B. 2016. “Digital Methodologies of Education Governance: Pearson PLC and the Remediation of Methods.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (1): 34-53.
    • Wittgenstein, L. [1953] 2009. Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article