Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hughes-Morley, A; Young, B; Waheed, W; Small, N; Bower, P (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Journal: Journal of Affective Disorders
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Systematic review; Depression; Patient recruitment; Meta-synthesis; Randomised controlled trials; Conceptual framework
BACKGROUND: Depression is common and clinical trials are crucial for evaluating treatments. Difficulties in recruiting participants into depression trials are well-documented, yet no study has examined the factors affecting recruitment. This review aims to identify the factors affecting recruitment into depression trials and to develop a conceptual framework through systematic assessment of published qualitative research. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-synthesis of published qualitative studies. Meta-synthesis involves a synthesis of themes across a number of qualitative studies to produce findings that are "greater than the sum of the parts". ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, Medline and PsychInfo were searched up to April 2013. Reference lists of included studies, key publications and relevant reviews were also searched. Quality appraisal adopted the "prompts for appraising qualitative research". RESULTS: 7977 citations were identified, and 15 studies were included. Findings indicate that the decision to enter a depression trial is made by patients and gatekeepers based on the patient׳s health state at the time of being approached to participate; on their attitude towards the research and trial interventions; and on the extent to which patients become engaged with the trial. Our conceptual framework highlights that the decision to participate by both the patient and the gatekeeper involves a judgement between risk and reward. LIMITATIONS: Only English language publications were included in this review. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this review have implications for the design of interventions to improve recruitment into depression trials. Such interventions may aim to diminish the perceived risks and increase the perceived rewards of participation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allen, M., Bromley, A., Kuyken, W., Sonnenberg, S.J., 2009. Participants' experiences of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: It changed me in just about every way possible. Behav. Cognit. Psychother. 37 (4), 413-430.
    • Andresen, E., Wilson, K., Castillo, A., Koopman, C., 2010. Patient motivation for participating in clinical trials for depression: validation of the motivation for clinical trials inventory-depression. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 25, 7-16.
    • Antman, E., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., Chalmers, T., 1992. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 268, 240-248.
    • Appelbaum, P., Roth, L., Lidz, C., 1982. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 5, 319-329.
    • Baquet, C., Henderson, K., Commiskey, P., Morrow, J., 2008. Clinical trials: the art of enrollment. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 24, 262-269.
    • Barbour, R., 2001. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? Br. Med. J. 322, 1115-1117.
    • Barlow, D.H., 2010. Negative effects from psychological treatments: a perspective. Am. Psychol. 65, 13.
    • Barnes, M., Wiles, N., Morrison, J., Kessler, D., Williams, C., Kuyken, W., Lewis, G., Turner, K., 2012. Exploring patients' reasons for declining contact in a cognitive behavioural therapy randomised controlled trial in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 62, e371-e377.
    • Bartlam, B., Crome, P., Lally, F., Beswick, A.D., Cherubini, A., Clarfield, A.M., Edbrooke, D., Farre, A., Hertogh, C., Lesauskaite, V., Mills, G., Muller, M., Oristrell, J., Prada, G.I., Ruggiero, C., Sinclair-Cohen, J., Szczerbinska, K., Topinkova, E., Zalewski, Z., 2012. The views of older people and carers on participation in clinical trials: the PREDICT study. J. Clin. Investig. 2, 327-336.
    • Barton, S., 2000. Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? the best RCT still trumps the best observational study. Br. Med. J. 321, 255.
    • Beck, C.T., 2002. Postpartum depression: a metasynthesis. Qual. Health Res. 12, 453-472.
    • Bevan, E., Chee, L., Mcghee, S., Mcinnes, G., 2012. Patients' attitudes to participation in clinical trials. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 35, 204-207.
    • Bonvicini, K.A., 1998. The art of recruitment: the foundation of family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness. Fam. Process 37, 153-165.
    • Boote, J.D., Dalgleish, M., Freeman, J., Jones, Z., Miles, M., Rodgers, H., 2014. But is it a question worth asking?'A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers' ideas being abandoned. Health Expect 17, 440-451.
    • Bower, P., King, M., Nazareth, I., Lampe, F., Sibbald, B., 2005. Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials: conceptual framework and implications for research. Soc. Sci. Med. 61, 685-695.
    • Bower, P., Wallace, P., Ward, E., Graffy, J., Miller, J., Delaney, B., Kinmonth, A.L., 2009. Improving recruitment to health research in primary care. Fam. Pract. 26, 391-397.
    • Breland-Noble, A.M., et al., 2011. “Mama just won't accept this”: adult perspectives on engaging depressed African American teens in clinical research and treatment. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 18 (3), 225-234.
    • Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., Pill, R., 2002. Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 7, 209-215.
    • Brown, G., Marshall, M., Bower, P., Woodham, A., Waheed, W., 2014. Barriers to recruiting ethnic minorities to mental health research: a systematic review. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 23, 36-38.
    • Caldwell, P.H., Murphy, S.B., Butow, P.N., Craig, J.C., 2004. Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364, 803-811.
    • Caldwell, P.H.Y., Hamilton, S., Tan, A., Craig, J.C., 2010. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med. 7, e1000368.
    • Campbell, M., Snowdon, C., Francis, D., Elbourne, D., Mcdonald, A., Knight, R., Al, E., 2007. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol. Assess. 11, iii, ix-105.
    • Carey, M.P., Morrison-Beedy, D., Carey, K.B., Maisto, S.A., Gordon, C.M., Pedlow, C.T., 2001. Psychiatric outpatients report their experiences as participants in a randomized clinical trial. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 189, 299-306.
    • Cassileth, B.R., Lusk, E.J., Miller, D.S., Hurwitz, S., 1982. Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 248, 968-970.
    • Centerwatch, 2009. State of the Clinical Trials Industry 2009: A Sourcebook of Charts and Statistics. CenterWatch, Boston, USA.
    • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Revbiews in Health Care. CRD, University of York, York.
    • Chamberlain, K., 2000. Methodolatry and qualitative health research. J. Health Psychol. 5, 285-296.
    • Chew-Graham, C.A., Lovell, K., Roberts, C., Baldwin, B., Morley, M., Burns, A., Burroughs, H., 2007. Achieving target recruitment in a primary care trial: lessons from PRIDE. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 8, 264-270.
    • Cox, K., 2000. Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences. Psycho-Oncology 9, 314-322.
    • Cooke, Alison, Debbie Smith, and Andrew Booth. "Beyond PICO The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis." Qual. Health Res. 22 (10), 2012, 1435-1443.
    • Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., Petticrew, M., 2008. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. Br. Med. J. 337, a1655.
    • Cramer, H., Salisbury, C., Conrad, J., Eldred, J., Araya, R., 2011. Group cognitive behavioural therapy for women with depression: pilot and feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial using mixed methods. BMC Psychiatry 11, 82.
    • Criscione, L.G., Sugarman, J., Sanders, L., Pisetsky, D.S., St Clair, E.W., 2003. Informed consent in a clinical trial of a novel treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 49, 361-367.
    • Dixon-Woods, M., Tarrant, C., 2009. Why do people cooperate with medical research? Findings from three studies. Soc. Sci. Med. 68, 2215-2222.
    • Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Young, B., Jones, D., Sutton, A., 2004a. Integrative Approaches to Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence. Agency, H.D., London.
    • Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R.L., Agarwal, S., Smith, J.A., 2004b. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual. Saf. Health Care 13, 223-225.
    • Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., 2006. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 6, 35.
    • Dixon-Woods, M., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Miller, T., Smith, J., Young, B., Jones, D., 2007. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 12 (1), 42-47.
    • Dowrick, C.F., Hughes, J.G., Hiscock, J.J., Wigglesworth, M., Walley, T.J., 2007. Considering the case for an antidepressant drug trial involving temporary deception: a qualitative enquiry of potential participants. BMC Health Serv. Res. 7, 64.
    • Drüeke, T.B., Descamps-Latscha, B., Locatelli, F., 2003. Stopping a medical research project for financial reasons. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18, 1982-1983.
    • Edge, D., 2008. 'We don't see Black women here': an exploration of the absence of Black Caribbean women from clinical and epidemiological data on perinatal depression in the UK. Midwifery 24 (4), 379-389.
    • Edwards, A., Mrcgp, G.E., Hood, K., Rollnick, S., 2000. Judging the 'weight of evidence'in systematic reviews: introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing signal and noise. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 6, 177-184.
    • Elliott, S., Brown, J., 2002. What are we doing to waiting list controls? Behav. Res. Ther. 40, 1047-1052.
    • Emanuel, E.J., Patterson, W.B., 1998. Ethics of randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 16, 365-371.
    • Fairhurst, K., Dowrick, C., 1996. Problems with recruitment in a randomized controlled trial of counselling in general practice: causes and implications. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 1, 77-80.
    • Fayter, D., Mcdaid, C., Eastwood, A., 2007. A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 60, 990-e1.
    • Flemming, K., Briggs, M., 2007. Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. J. Adv. Nurs. 57, 95-100.
    • Fletcher, B., Gheorghe, A., Moore, D., Wilson, S., Damery, S., 2012. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. Br. Med. J. 2, e000496.
    • Foy, R., Duggan, A., Delaney, B., Wilson, S., Lewin-Van Den Broek, N., Lassen, A., Vickers, L., Myres, P., 2003. How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam. Pract. 20, 83-92.
    • Froelicher, E.S., Lorig, K., 2002. Who cares about recruitment anyway? Patient Educ. Couns. 48, 97.
    • Garnham, J., Slaney, C., O'donovan, C., 2011. Depression trial subject exclusion characteristics. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 26, e18.
    • Gask, L., Macdonald, W., Bower, P., 2011. What is the relationship between diabetes and depression? A qualitative meta-synthesis of patient experience of comorbidity. Chronic Illn. 7, 239-252.
    • Gaudiano, B.A., et al., 2013. Patients' treatment expectancies in clinical trials of antidepressants versus psychotherapy for depression: a study using hypothetical vignettes. Compr. Psychiatry 54 (1), 28-33.
    • Gorecki, C.A., Brown, J.M., Briggs, M., Nixon, J., 2010. Evaluation of five search strategies in retrieving qualitative patient-reported electronic data on the impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life. J. Adv. Nurs. 66, 645-652.
    • Gough, D., 2007. Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Res. Pap. Educ. 22, 213-228.
    • Grant, J., et al., 2009. Participants' perceptions of motivation, randomisation and withdrawal in a randomised controlled trial of interventions for prevention of depression. J. Med. Ethics: J. Inst. Med. Ethics 35 (12), 768-773.
    • Higgins, J., Green, S. (Eds.), 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, Chichester, UK ([Updated March 2011]).
    • Gross, C.P., Mallory, R., Heiat, A., Krumholz, H.M., 2002. Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there? Ann. Int. Med. 137, 10-16.
    • Haberfellner, E.M., 2000. Recruitment of depressive patients for a controlled clinical trial in a psychiatric practice. Pharmacopsychiatry 33, 142-144.
    • Halpern, S., Karlawish, J., Berlin, J., 2002. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trails. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288, 358-362.
    • Hardeveld, F., Spijker, J., De Graaf, R., Nolen, W.A., Beekman, A.T., 2010. Prevalence and predictors of recurrence of major depressive disorder in the adult population. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 122, 184-191.
    • Hetherton, J., Matheson, A., Robson, M., 2004. Recruitment by GPs during consultations in a primary care randomized controlled trial comparing computerized psychological therapy with clinical psychology and routine GP care: problems and possible solutions. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 5, 5-10.
    • Hinton, L., Zweifach, M., Oishi, S., Tang, L., Unutzer, J., 2006. Gender disparities in the treatment of late-life depression: qualitative and quantitative findings from the IMPACT trial. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 14, 884-892.
    • Howard, L., Thornicroft, G., 2006. Patient preference randomised controlled trials in mental health research. Br. J. Pshychiatry 188, 303-304.
    • Hunt, C.J., Shepherd, L.M., Andrews, G., 2001. Do doctors know best? Comments on a failed trial. Med. J. Aust. 174, 144-146.
    • Hussain-Gambles, M., 2004. South Asian patients' views and experiences of clinical trial participation. Fam. Pract. 21, 636-642.
    • Jenkins, V., Fallowfield, L., 2000. Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy. Br. J. Cancer 82, 1783.
    • Jenkinson, C.E., Winder, R.E., Sugg, H.V.R., Roberts, M.J., Ridgway, N., Kuyken, W., Wiles, N., Kessler, D., Campbell, J., 2014. Why do GPs exclude patients from participating in research? An exploration of adherence to and divergence from trial criteria. Fam. Pract. 31, 364-370.
    • Johnson, V.A., Powell-Young, Y.M., Torres, E.R., Spruill, I.J., 2011. A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies. ABNF J. 22, 84-88.
    • Katz, T., Fisher, P., Katz, A., Davidson, J., Feder, G., 2005. The feasibility of a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial of homeopathic treatment of depression in general practice. Homeopathy 94, 145-152.
    • Khan, N., Bower, P., Rogers, A., 2007. Guided self-help in primary care mental health: meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of patient experience. Br. J. Pshychiatry 191, 206-211.
    • King, M., Nazareth, I., Lampe, F., Bower, P., Chandler, M., Morou, M., Sibbald, B., Lai, R., 2005. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol. Assess. 9, 1-186.
    • Knowles, S., Toms, G., Sanders, C., Bee, P., Lovell, K., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Coyle, D., Kennedy, C., Littlewood, E., Kessler, D., Gilbody, S., Bower, P., 2014. Qualitative meta-synthesis of user experience of computerised therapy for depression and anxiety. PLoS One 9, e84323.
    • Kokanovic, R., et al., 2009. The politics of conducting research on depression in a cross-cultural context. Qual. Health Res. 19 (5), 708-717.
    • Lamb, J., Bower, P., Rogers, A., Dowrick, C., Gask, L., 2012. Access to mental health in primary care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of evidence from the experience of people from 'hard to reach' groups. Health 16, 76-104.
    • Langer, S., Chew-Graham, C., Hunter, C., Guthrie, E.A., Salmon, P., 2013. Why do patients with long‐term conditions use unscheduled care? A qualitative literature review. Health Soc. Care Community 21, 339-351.
    • Lilienfeld, S.O., 2007. Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 53-70.
    • Limkakeng, A., Phadtare, A., Shah, J., Vaghasia, M., Wei, D.Y., Shah, A., Pietrobon, R., 2013. Willingness to participate in clinical trials among patients of Chinese heritage: a meta-synthesis. PLoS One 8, e51328.
    • Locock, L., Smith, L., 2011. Personal benefit, or benefiting others? Deciding whether to take part in clinical trials. Clin. Trials 8, 85-93.
    • Loraas, E.L., 2009. Patient motivation for participation in clinical trials for depression: development and validation of the motivation for clinical trials inventorydepression (MCTI-D). Diss. Abstr. Int. 69, 5038.
    • Loue, S., Sajatovic, M., 2008. Research with severely mentally ill Latinas: successful recruitment and retention strategies. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 10 (2), 145-153.
    • Malpass, A., Shaw, A., Sharp, D., Walter, F., Feder, G., Ridd, M., Kessler, D., 2009. “Medication career” or “moral career”? The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients' experience of antidepressants. Soc. Sci. Med. 68, 154.
    • Marshall, I.J., Wolfe, C.D.A., Mckevitt, C., 2012. Lay perspectives on hypertension and drug adherence: systematic review of qualitative research. Br. Med. J. 345, e3953.
    • Mason, V., Shaw, A., Wiles, N., Mulligan, J., Peters, T., Sharp, D., Lewis, G., 2007. GPs' experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment. Fam. Pract. 24, 518-525.
    • Mays, N., Pope, C., 2000. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Br. Med. J. 1, 50-52.
    • McFarland, C., et al., 2002. The establishment of a brain bank for the study of latelife depression: a feasibility study of factors facilitating consent. CNS Spectr. 7 (11), 816-821.
    • Mccann, S., Campbell, M., Entwistle, V., 2013. Recruitment to clinical trials: a metaethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 18, 233-241.
    • Mccann, S.K., Campbell, M.K., Entwistle, V.A., 2010. Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self. Trials 11, 31.
    • Mcdonald, A., Knight, R., Campbell, M., Entwistle, V., Grant, A., Cook, J., 2006. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 7, 9.
    • Mendel, P., Ngo, V.K., Dixon, E., Stockdale, S., Jones, F., Chung, B., Jones, A., Masongsong, Z., Khodyakov, D., 2011. Partnered evaluation of a community engagement intervention: use of a kickoff conference in a randomized trial for depression care improvement in underserved communities. Ethn. Dis. 21, S78-S88.
    • Minas, H., Klimidis, S., Kokanovic, R., 2005. Mental health research in general practice. Australas. Psychiatry 13, 181-184.
    • Minas, H., Klimidis, S., Kokanovic, R., 2005. Mental health research in general practice. Australas. Psychiatry 13 (2), 181-184.
    • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Int. Med. 151, 264-269.
    • Mullins, C.D., Vandigo, J., Zheng, Z., Wicks, P., 2014. Patient-centeredness in the design of clinical trials. Value Health 17, 471-475.
    • National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2009. Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults. In: Excellence, N.I.O.H.A.C. (Ed.), NICE Clinical Guideline 90. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, London.
    • Noblit, G.W., Hare, R.D., 1988. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. SAGE Publications, Incorporated, Newbury Park, CA, USA.
    • Nutt, D.J., Sharpe, M., 2008. Uncritical positive regard? Issues in the efficacy and safety of psychotherapy. J. Psychopharmacol. 22, 3.
    • O'Donnell, A.B., et al., 2007. Using focus groups to improve the validity of crossnational survey research: a study of physician decision making. Qual. Health Res. 17 (7), 971-981.
    • Oxman, A., Guyatt, G., 1993. The science of reviewing research. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 703, 125-133.
    • Parry, G. & Barkham, M., 2009. Trials & tribulations: towards better design and practice in psychological therapy trials. In: Proceedings of the Society for Social Medicine Conference. Sheffield, UK.
    • Patel, M.X., Doku, V., Tennakoon, L., 2003. Challenges in recruitment of research participants. Advances 9, 229-238.
    • Peters, S., 2010. Qualitative research methods in mental health. Evid. Based Ment. Health 13, 35-40.
    • Peto, R., Baigent, C., 1998. Trials: the next 50 years: large scale randomised evidence of moderate benefits. Br. Med. J. 317, 1170.
    • Petticrew, M., Egan, M., Thomson, H., Hamilton, V., Kunkler, R., Roberts, H., 2008. Publication bias in qualitative research: what becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences? J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62, 552-554.
    • Pettigrew, M., Roberts, H., 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell, Oxford.
    • Prescott, R., Counsell, C., Gillespie, W., Grant, A., Russell, I., Kiauka, S., 1999. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol. Assess. 3, 1-143.
    • Rendell, J., Licht, R., 2007. Under-recruitment of patients for clinical trials: an illustrative example of a failed study. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 115, 337-339.
    • Rendell, J., Merritt, R., Geddes, J., 2007. Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, MR000021.
    • Roberts, L.W., Kim, J.P., 2014. Do investigators understandethically-important perspectives of clinical research participants? A 'piggy-back' studyof attunement and alignment in serious illness research. J. Psychiatr. Res. 54, 36-43.
    • Ross, M., Jeffords, K., Gold, J., 1994. Reasons for entry into and understanding of HIV/AIDS clinical trials: a preliminary study. AIDS Care 6, 77-82.
    • Ross, S., Grant, A., Counsell, C., Gillespie, W., Russell, I., Prescott, R., 1999. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52, 1143-1156.
    • Rost, K., Nutting, P.A., Smith, J., Werner, J.J., 2000. Psychiatry and primary care. Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to improve the quality and outcome of care for major depression. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 22 (2), 66-77.
    • Ruddell, M., Spencer, A., Hill, K., House, A., 2007. Fluoxetine vs placebo for depressive symptoms after stroke: failed randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 22, 963-965.
    • Sacks, H., Chalmers, T., Smith, H.J., 1982. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am. J. Med. 72, 233-240.
    • Salmon, P., Peters, S., Rogers, A., Gask, L., Clifford, R., Iredale, W., Dowrick, C., Morriss, R., 2007. Peering through the barriers in GPs' explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time. Fam. Pract. 24, 269-275.
    • Salmon, P., Hill, J., Ward, J., Gravenhorst, K., Eden, T., Young, B., 2012. Faith and protection: the construction of hope by parents of children with leukemia and their oncologists. Oncologist 17, 398-404.
    • Schroer, S., Macpherson, H., 2009. Acupuncture, or non-directive counselling versus usual care for the treatment of depression: a pilot study. Trials 10, 3.
    • Schroer, S., Macpherson, H., Adamson, J., 2009. Designing an RCT of acupuncture for depression-identifying appropriate patient groups: a qualitative study. Fam. Pract. 26, 188-195.
    • Schroer, S., Kanaan, M., MacPherson, H., Adamson, J., 2012. Acupuncture for depression: exploring model validity and the related issue of credibility in the context of designing a pragmatic trial. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 18 (4), 318-326.
    • Sharp, L., Cotton, S., Alexander, L., Williams, E., Gray, N., Reid, J., 2006. Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (trial of management of borderline and other low-grade abnormal smears). Clin. Trials 3, 431-442.
    • Shellman, J., Mokel, M., 2010. Overcoming barriers to conducting an intervention study of depression in an older African American population. J. Transcult. Nurs. 21, 361-369.
    • Simpson, S., Corney, R., Fitzgerald, P., Beecham, J., 2000. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of counselling patients with chronic depression. Health Technol. Assess. 4 (36), 1-83.
    • Sloane, P.D., Callahan, L., Kahwati, L., Mitchell, C.M., 2006. Development of a practice-based patient cohort for primary care research. Fam. Med. 38 (1), 50-58.
    • Smith, C.T., Hickey, H., Clarke, M., Blazeby, J., Williamson, P., 2014. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials 15, 32.
    • Snowdon, C., Elbourne, D., Garcia, J., 2007. Declining enrolment in a clinical trial and injurious misconceptions: is there a flipside to the therapeutic misconception? Clin. Ethics 2, 193-200.
    • Stack, R.J., Shaw, K., Mallen, C., Herron-Marx, S., Horne, R., Raza, K., 2012. Delays in help seeking at the onset of the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic synthesis of qualitative literature. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 71, 493-497.
    • Steinman, L., et al., 2012. Implementation of an evidence-based depression care management program (PEARLS): perspectives from staff and former clients. Prev. Chronic Dis. 9, E91.
    • Stek, M.L., Van Der Wurff, F.B., Uitdehaag, B.M.J., Beekman, A.T.F., Hoogendijk, W.J. G., 2007. ECT in the treatment of depressed elderly: lessons from a terminated clinical trial. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 22, 1052-1054.
    • Stern, P.N., Harris, C.C., 1985. Women's health and the self‐care paradox. A model to guide self‐care readiness. Health Care Women Int. 6, 151-163.
    • Sully, B.G., Julious, S.A., Nicholl, J., 2013. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 14, 166.
    • Tallon, D., Mulligan, J., Wiles, N., Thomas, L., Peters, T.J., Elgie, R., Sharp, D., Lewis, G., 2011. Involving patients with depression in research: survey of patients' attitudes to participation. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 61, 134-141.
    • Tenhave, T.R., Coyne, J., Salzer, M., Katz, I., 2003. Research to improve the quality of care for depression: alternatives to the simple randomized clinical trial. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 25, 115-123.
    • Timmerman, G.M., 1996. The art of advertising for research subjects. Nurs. Res. 45, 339-340 (344).
    • Tong, A., Flemming, K., Mcinnes, E., Oliver, S., Craig, J., 2012. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 12, 181.
    • Torpey, D.C., Klein, D.N., 2008. Chronic depression: update on classification and treatment. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 10, 458-464.
    • Tramm, R., Daws, K., Schadewaldt, V., 2013. Clinical trial recruitment-a complex intervention? J. Clin. Nurs. 22, 2436-2443.
    • Treweek, S., Lockhart, P., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J.A., Kjeldstrom, M., Johansen, M., Taskila, T.K., Sullivan, F.M., Wilson, S., Jackson, C., Jones, R., Mitchell, E.D., 2013. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 3, e002360.
    • Uebelecker, L.A., Marootian, B.A., et al., 2012. Barriers and facilitators of treatment for depression in a latino community: a focus group study. Community Ment. Health J. 48, 114-126.
    • Uybico, S., Pavel, S., Gross, C., 2007. Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: a systematic review of recruitment interventions. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 22, 852-863.
    • Van Der Weele, G.M., De Jong, R., De Waal, M.W., Spinhoven, P., Rooze, H.A., Reis, R., Assendelft, W.J., Gussekloo, J., Van Der Mast, R.C., 2012. Response to an unsolicited intervention offer to persons aged Z 75 years after screening positive for depressive symptoms: a qualitative study. Int. Psychogeriatr. 24, 270-277.
    • Wasan, A.D., Taubenberger, S.P., Robinson, W.M., 2009. Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent? Pain Med. 10 (1), 111-119.
    • Watson, J., Torgerson, D., 2006. Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 6, 1-9.
    • van Weel, C., van Weel-Baumgarten, E., Mold, J., 2006. The importance of longitudinal studies in family medicine: experiences of two practice-based research networks. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 19 (1), 69-74.
    • Wetterneck, C.T., Little, T.E., Rinehart, K.L., Cervantes, M.E., Hyde, E., Williams, M., 2012. Latinos with obsessive-compulsive disorder: mental healthcare utilization and inclusion in clinical trials. J Obbessive-Compuls. Relat. Disord. 1, 85-97.
    • Whiting, M., Leavey, G., Scammell, A., Au, S., King, M., 2008. Using acupuncture to treat depression: a feasibility study. Complement. Ther. Med. 16 (2), 87-91.
    • Willison, D.J., et al., 2009. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions? BMC Med. Ethics 10, 1.
    • Woodall, A., Morgan, C., Sloan, C., Howard, L., 2010. Barriers to participation in mental health research: are there specific gender, ethnicity and age related barriers? BMC Psychiatry 10, 103.
    • Woodford, J., Farrand, P., Bessant, M., Williams, C., 2011. Recruitment into a guided internet based CBT (iCBT) intervention for depression: lesson learnt from the failure of a prevalence recruitment strategy. Contemp. Clin. Trials 32, 641-648.
    • Woolfall, K., Young, B., Frith, L., Appleton, R., Iyer, A., Messahel, S., Hickey, H., Gamble, C., 2014. Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting. BMJ Open 4, e005045.
    • World Health Organisation, 2004. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. World Health Organisation, Geneva.
    • World Health Organisation. 2013. Mental health: suicide prevention (SUPRE) [online]. 〈http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicidepre vent/en/〉 (accessed 18.06.13.).
    • Yastrubetskaya, O., Chiu, E., O'connell, S., 1997. Is good clinical research practice for clinical trials good clinical practice? Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 12, 227-231.
    • Young, B., Shilling, V., Hickey, H., Sowden, E., Smyth, R.L., Williamson, P.R., 2011. What parents think about being approached about children's trials, how this differs from what practitioners expect, and what this tells us about enhancing recruitment. Trials 12, A116.
  • No similar publications.