LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hodgkinson, Ian R.; Hughes, Paul; Hughes, Mathew; Glennon, Russ (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: performance, ownership, outsourcing, satisfaction, citizens, publicness, contracting

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link. Governments across the world outsource service delivery to external agents, but does ownership matter for service delivery value? Though theory points to clear ownership differences on effectiveness, there remains limited empirical evidence of the impact of ownership on citizens’ satisfaction. Focusing on local authorities in England, we draw on secondary data (2007 and 2009) to examine if ownership type matters. The findings indicate that ownership–public, nonprofit, private–confers no direct benefits for citizens’ satisfaction suggesting that the outsourcing decision should not rely on unfounded assumptions about performance differentials between ownership types. The implications for public management are explored.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alford, J. 2016. “Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending Public ServiceDominant Logic.” Public Management Review 18 (5): 674-691.
    • Alonso, J. M., R. Andrews, and I. R. Hodgkinson. 2016. “Institutional, Ideological and Political Influences on Local Government Contracting: Evidence from England.” Public Administration. 94 (1): 244-262.
    • Amirkhanyan, A. A., H. J. Kim, and K. T. Lambright. 2008. “Does the Public Sector Outperform the Nonprofit and For-Profit Sectors? Evidence from a National Panel Study on Nursing Home Quality and Access.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27 (2): 326-53.
    • Andersen, L. B. and M. Blegvad. 2006. “Does Ownership Matter for the Delivery of Professionalized Public Services? Cost-Efficiency and Effectiveness in Private and Public Dental Care for Children in Denmark.” Public Administration 84 (1): 147-164.
    • Andersen, L. B., A. Boesen, and L. H. Pedersen. 2016. “Performance in Public Organizations: Clarifying the Conceptual Space.” Public Administration Review DOI:10.1111/puar.12578.
    • Andersen, L. B. and M. Jakobsen. 2011. “Does Ownership Matter for the Provision of Professionalized Services? Hip Operations at Publicly and Privately Owned Clinics in Denmark.” Public Administration 89 (3): 956-974.
    • Andrews, R. and T. Entwistle. 2013. “Four Faces of Public Service Efficiency: What, How, When and for Whom to Produce.” Public Management Review 15 (2): 246-264.
    • Andrews, R. and S. Van de Walle. 2013. “New Public Management and Citizens' Perceptions of Local Service Efficiency, Responsiveness, Equity and Effectiveness.” Public Management Review 15 (5): 762-783.
    • Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2009. “Strategy, Structure and Process in the Public Sector: A Test of the Miles and Snow Model.” Public Administration 87 (4): 732-749.
    • Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2011a. “Dimensions of publicness and Organizational Performance: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (3): 301-319.
    • Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole, and R. M. Walker. 2011b. “Vertical Strategic Alignment and Public Service Performance.” Public Administration 90 (1): 77-98.
    • Andrews, R., G. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2011c. “The Impact of Management on Administrative and Survey Measures Of Organizational Performance.” Public Management Review 13 (2): 227-255.
    • Ashworth, R, G. A. Boyne, and R. Delbridge. 2009. “Escape From the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (1): 165-187.
    • Audit Commission. 2006. Public Sports and Recreation Services: Making Them Fit for the Future. Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England, Local Government National Report, June.
    • Boyne, G. A. 2006. “Strategies for Public Service Turnaround: Lessons from the Private Sector?” Administration & Society 38 (3): 365-88.
    • Boardman, A. E. and A. R. Vining. 1989. “ Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises.” Journal of Law and Economics 32 (1): 1-33.
    • Department for Communities and Local Government. 2007. Best Value User Satisfaction Surveys 2006-07. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
    • Department for Communities and Local Government. 2009. Place Survey 2008, England. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
    • Department for Communities and Local Government. 2011. English Indices of Deprivation 2010. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
    • Entwistle, T. and S. Martin. 2005. “From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research.” Public Administration 83 (1): 233-242.
    • Girth, A. M., A. Hefetz, J. M. Johnston, and M. E. Warner. 2012. “Outsourcing Public Service Delivery: Management Responses in Noncompetitive Markets.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 887-900.
    • Hansen, J. R. and E. Ferlie. 2016. “Applying Strategic Management Theories in Public Sector Organizations: Developing a Typology.” Public Management Review 18 (1): 1-19.
    • Hansen, J. R. and C. B. Jacobsen. 2016. “Changing Strategy Processes and Strategy Content in Public Sector Organizations? A Longitudinal Case Study of NPM Reforms' Influence on Strategic Management.” British Journal of Management. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12157.
    • Hodgkinson, I. R. and P. Hughes. 2014. “Strategy Content and Public Service Provider Performance in the UK: An Alternative Approach.” Public Administration 92 (3): 707-726.
    • Hodgkinson, I. R. and P. Hughes. 2012. “The Performance Implications Of Strategic Capital For Public Leisure Providers.” Service Industries Journal 32 (8): 1375-1391.
    • Högström, C., S. Davoudi, M. Löfgren, and M. Johnson. 2016. “Relevant and Preferred Public Service: A Study of User Experiences and Value Creation in Public Transit.” Public Management Review 18 (1): 65-90.
    • Jilke, S. and S. Van de Walle. 2013. “Two Track Public Services? Citizens' Voice Behaviour towards Liberalized Services in the EU15.” Public Management Review 15 (4): 465-476.
    • Miller, S. M. and S. Moulton. 2014. “Publicness in Policy Environments: A Multilevel Analysis of Substance Abuse Treatment Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (3): 553-589.
    • O'Toole, L. J. and K. J. Meier. 2004. “Parkinson's Law and the New Public Management? Contracting Determinants and Service-Quality Consequences in Public Education.” Public Administration Review 64 (3): 342-352.
    • Poister, T. H. and G. T. Henry. 1994. “Citizen Ratings of Public and Private Service Quality: A Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration Review 54 (2): 155-60.
    • Poister, T. H. and J. C. Thomas. 2011. “The Effect of Expectations and Expectancy Confirmation/Disconfirmation on Motorists' Satisfaction with State Highways.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (4): 601-617.
    • Rho, E. 2013. “Contracting Revisited: Determinants and Consequences of Contracting Out for Public Education Services.” Public Administration Review 73 (2): 327-337.
    • Van Ryzin, G. G. 2006. “Testing the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model of Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (4): 599-611.
    • Van Ryzin, G. G. 2007. “Pieces of a Puzzle: Linking Government Performance, Citizen Satisfaction, and Trust.” Public Performance & Management Review 30 (4): 521-535.
    • Van Ryzin, G. G. and E. Charbonneau. 2010. “Public Service Use and Perceived Performance: An Empirical Note on the Nature of the Relationship.” Public Administration 88 (2): 551-563.
    • Tukey Test (p≤.05)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article