Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Goodchild, E
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: other
The first industry standard for environmental management systems, BS 7750, was\ud published in the UK in September 1994. Since then we have seen the EC Ecomanagement\ud and Audit Scheme come into force in April 1995 and an international\ud environmental management system standard, ISO 14001, published in September\ud 1996.\ud The EMS standards allow organisations to have their environmental management\ud systems externally assessed and approved. The first companies became registered to\ud BS 7750 in April 1995, with approximately 70 organisations gaining certification during\ud its first year of operation. Since then uptake of the standards has been steady but\ud slow with many companies delaying their decision until the implications of adopting\ud such a recognised approach have been clarified.\ud This research reviews the experiences of organisations adopting the standards during\ud their early years of operation. Key lessons are learnt from a three year Teaching\ud Company Scheme project designing and implementing an EMS for a large chemical\ud manufacturer. The author also draws on evidence obtained through a survey of\ud organisations gaining BS 7750 certification during its first year of operation and a\ud number of detailed case-studies.\ud The aim of the research is to identify and assess the implications for industry of the\ud EMS standards. Their impacts on business performance in terms of operational\ud efficiency, competitive advantage, legislative compliance, public image and staff\ud morale are assessed and their variability between organisations explained. The\ud resource commitments required to achieve certification are identified including\ud management time, capital expenditure, consultancy fees and certification charges.\ud Accounting mechanisms for comparing the costs and income associated with\ud environmental activities are reviewed and their applicability to monitoring the\ud performance of an EMS evaluated. The research concludes with the identification of\ud decision making criteria to assist companies in determining their environmental\ud strategy.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article