LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Liccardo, Sabrina (2013)
Publisher: University of East London, School of Law and Social Sciences
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects:
Archimedes purportedly announced, "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to\ud place it, and I shall move the world.” Archimedes was referring to how the use of a lever could\ud provide leverage by amplifying an input force to create a greater output force executed against an\ud object. Thus, the basic elements of a lever include effort, load or resistance, a lever arm, pivoting\ud point and a fulcrum. In this theoretical paper, I have mapped several concepts onto the following\ud elements of a lever; the psychological world onto ‘effort’, the socio-material world onto ‘load’,\ud history, culture, and tradition onto the ‘lever arm’, temporality onto the ‘pivoting point’, narratives\ud onto the ‘fulcrum’ and a ‘chronotope’ onto the ground. Who is the ‘One’ that attempts to move the\ud ‘other’ and how does he use the elements of a ‘lever’ to do so? In a phallocratic culture, the\ud difference between a set of dualities is constructed as binary opposites and the positive terms,\ud which dominate the binary, are linked to one particular sex. Thus, man (the ‘One’) is valued over\ud woman (its negative ‘other’). If we are to transform culture we need to destabilise the binary\ud opposition that is founded in the male/female couple (Cixous, 1981). Thus, in this paper I\ud compare mechanical nature of a lever with the dichotomous patriarchal social system, in which\ud the masculine dominates the construction of meaning. I use the elements of a ‘lever’ to illustrate\ud how the reproduction of a phallocratic culture might occur. This patriarchal social system follows\ud the principles of digital computing in that it encodes ‘data’ that are associated with the masculine\ud and feminine into binary oppositions. However, the ‘cyborg’ (Haraway, 1991) as a quantum\ud machine, can exist in more than one state simultaneously. The cyborg maintains a state of\ud ‘quantum superposition’ and ‘quantum entanglement’ because when it is in one state of a binary,\ud it partly exists in the other state simultaneously. Due to this entanglement, each member of the\ud binary must be delineated relative to one another. I thus conceptualise the cyborg at the centre of\ud this lever as it embodies the self as a psychological, socio-material and cultural phenomenon thus\ud providing an interpretive entry point to understanding ontology as the entanglement of subject\ud and object, space and time, matter and meaning, history and fiction. Furthermore, the cyborg\ud utilises narratives (stories) to reconstruct identity in the interplay of duality.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, B. (2006) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
    • Andrews, M. (2004). The Uses of Narrative: Explorations in Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies. Transaction Publishers.
    • Andrews, M, Squire, C., and Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). 2008. Doing Narrative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Bakhtin, M.M. 1981 [1930's]. The dialogical imagination: four essays. (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
    • Barad, K. (2012). Interview with Karen Barad. In Van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. New Metaphysics, 1-195.
    • Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1983) [1997]. The Forms of Capital. In Education: Culture, Economy, and Society, edited by A. H. Halsey et al. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Bruner, J. (2002). Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Cixous, H. (1981). Castration or Decapitation. Trans. and Introd. Annette Kuhn. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7 (1), 41-55.
    • Crites, S. (1986). Storytime: Recollecting the past and projecting the future. In T. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative Psychology. New York.: Praeger.
    • Dirac, P. (1947). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (2nd edition). Clarendon Press.
    • Fay, B. (1996). Contemporary philosophy of social science: a multicultural approach. Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Freeman, M. (1993). Rewriting the Self: History, memory narrative. London: Routledge.
    • Gadamer, H. (1982). Truth and Method. New York: Crossroads
    • Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. New York: Routledge.
    • Hinchman, L. P and Hinchman, S. K. (1997). 'Introduction', in Hinchman, L. P and Hinchman, S. K. (eds). Memory, Identity, Community: the Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences. New York: State University of New York. pp. Xiii -xxxii.
    • Josselson, R. (1995). Empathy, Narrative and the Dialogic Self in Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives (Vol. 3). London: Sage.
    • Kuhn, A. (2002). Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination, London and New York, Verso.
    • McQuillan, M. (2000). The Narrative Reader. Routledge.
    • McAdams, D.P. (1993). The Stories we live by: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: Guildford.
    • Moi, T. (1988). Feminism, Postmodernism, and Style: Recent Feminist Criticism in the United States. Cultural Critique, (9), 3.
    • Polkinghorne, D.E. (1988). Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany: Suny.
    • Reissman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage
    • Renes, J. M. (2012). The Physics of Quantum Information: Complementarity, Uncertainty, and Entanglement. Habilitation thesis, TU Darmstadt, Cornell University.
    • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative, Volume 1. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Ricoeur, P. (1985). Time and Narrative, Volume 2. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative, Volume 3. Chicago and London: University of Chicago 43 Press.
    • Ricoeur, P. (1991a). Narrative identity. Philosophy today, 35(1), 73-81.
    • Ricoeur, P. (1991b). Life in Quest of Narrative. In Wood, D. On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation. Routledge. pp. 20 − 33.
    • Rose, P. (2010). Parallel Lives: Five Victorian Marriages. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
    • Schrödinger, E. (1935). Discussion of Probability Relations Between Separated Systems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 31: 555-63.
    • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197- 214.
    • Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article