Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Light, Ann; Miskelly, C. (2009)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown

This paper describes a fluid and responsive design process identified among certain practitioners involved in solving social problems or inspiring social change. Their practice is both user-centred and participative in its approach and addresses the shortcomings of many top-down initiatives. These people work tactically to weave together policy knowledge, funding opportunities, local initiative and ideas for improving social and environmental conditions, acting as connectors, activists and facilitators in different contexts at different times. Although their activities are recognisably related to more conventional designing practices, the materials they use in finding solutions are unusual in that they may include the beneficiaries themselves and other features of the social structure in which they are effecting change. We present an ethnographic study of practices in designing that focuses on social initiatives rather than the tangible products or systems that might support them. We explore the how design practices map to the process of winning local people's commitment to projects with a social flavour. To situate the discussion in a political context we draw on de Certeau’s distinction between strategic and tactical behaviour and look at how our informants occupy a space as mediators between groups with power and a sense of agency and those without.\ud


\ud Keywords:
\ud Social Change; Ethnographic Action Research; Discourse Analysis; Designing In The Wild

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Dorst, K. (2008). Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies, 29, 4-11.
    • Hester, R. (1996). Economic Progress, Prostor, 4 (1/11), 7-26.
    • Kensing, F. & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory Design: Issues & Concerns.
    • Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 167 - 185.
    • Krimerman, L. (2001) Participatory Action Research: Should Social Inquiry Be Conducted Democratically? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31, 60 - 82.
    • Light, A (2006) Adding Method to Meaning: a technique for exploring peoples' experience with digital products, Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 175-187.
    • Louridas, P. (1999) Design as Bricolage: Anthropology Meets Design Thinking, Design Studies, 20 (6), 517-535.
    • Miskelly, C. (2002). Community Storytelling using Hypermedia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of the West of England.
    • Nelson, N. & Wright, S. (1995) Power and Participatory Development: theory and practice, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.
    • Owen, H. (1997) Open Space Technology: A User's Guide, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
    • Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage.
    • RED 2006: Touching the State (2004) http://www.designcouncil.info/mt/RED/ Tacchi, J., Slater, D. & Hearn, G. (2003) A user's handbook developed to innovate and research ICT applications for poverty eradication, http://unescodelhi.nic.in/publications/ear.pdf
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article