Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Yuan, Xiaofang; Liu, Yuanming; Xiang, Yongzhong; Yan, Xinggang (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: T
Bidirectional inductive power transfer (BIPT) system facilitates contactless power transfer between two sides and across an air-gap, through weak magnetic coupling. Typically, this system is nonlinear high order system which includes nonlinear switch components and resonant networks, developing of accurate model is a challenging task. In this paper, a novel technique for parameter identification of a BIPT system is presented by using chaotic-enhanced fruit fly optimization algorithm (CFOA). The fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA) is a new meta-heuristic technique based on the swarm behavior of the fruit fly. This paper proposes a novel CFOA, which employs chaotic sequence to enhance the global optimization capacity of original FOA. The parameter identification of the BIPT system is formalized as a multi-dimensional optimization problem, and an objective function is established minimizing the errors between the estimated and measured values. All the 11 parameters of this system (Lpi, LT, Lsi, Lso, CT, Cs, M, Rpi, RT, Rsi and Rso) can be identified simultaneously using measured input–output data. Simulations show that the proposed parameter identification technique is robust to measurements noise and variation of operation condition and thus it is suitable for practical application.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] C.S. Wang, O.H. Steilau, G.A. Covic, Design considerations for a contactless electric vehicle battery charger, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. 52 (5) (2005) 1308-1314.
    • [2] U.K. Madawala, D.J. Thrimawithana, N. Kularatna, An ICPT-supercapacitor based hybrid system for surge free power transfer, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. 54 (6) (2007) 3287-3297.
    • [3] A.K. Swain, M.J. Neath, U.K. Madawala, D.J. Thrimawithana, A dynamic model for bi-directional inductive power transfer systems, in: Proceedings: IECON 2011, vol. 1, 2011, pp. 1024-1029.
    • [4] U.K. Madawala, D.J. Thrimawithana, A bidirectional inductive power interface for electric vehicles in V2G systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. 58 (10) (2011) 4789-4796.
    • [5] A.K. Swain, M.J. Neath, U.K. Madawala, D.J. Thrimawithana, A dynamic multivariable state-space model for bidirectional inductive power transfer systems, IEEE Trans. Power Electr. 27 (1) (2012) 4772-4780.
    • [6] H. Zang, S. Zhang, K. Hapeshi, A review of nature-inspired algorithms, J. Bionic Eng. 7 (S) (2010) S232-S237.
    • [7] B.C. Mohan, R. Baskaran, A survey: Ant colony optimization based recent research and implementation on several engineering domain, Exp. Syst. Appl. 39 (4) (2012) 4618-4627.
    • [8] C. Changdar, G.S. Mahapatra, R.K. Pal, An ant colony optimization approach for binary knapsack problem under fuzziness, Appl. Math. Comput. 233 (2013) 243-253.
    • [9] M.S. Kiran, O. Findik, A directed artificial bee colony algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput. 26 (2015) 454-462.
    • [10] K. Ayan, U. Kilic, Artificial bee colony algorithm solution for optimal reactive power flow, Appl. Soft Comput. 12 (5) (2012) 1477-1482.
    • [11] V. Ahuja, R.J. Hartfield, A. Shelton, Optimization of hypersonic aircraft using genetic algorithms, Appl. Math. Comput. 242 (2014) 423-434.
    • [12] M. Thakur, S.S. Meghwani, H. Jalota, A modified real coded genetic algorithm for constrained optimization, Appl. Math. Comput. 235 (2014) 292-317.
    • [13] A.H. Gandomi, X.S. Yang, A.H. Alavi, Mixed variable structural optimization using firefly algorithm, Comput. Struct. 89 (23-24) (2011) 2325-2336.
    • [14] T.J. Hsieh, A bacterial gene recombination algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems, Appl. Math. Comput. 231 (2014) 187-204.
    • [15] Y. Marinakis, M. Marinaki, Combinatorial neighborhood topology bumble bees mating optimization for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands, Soft Comput. 19 (2) (2015) 353-373.
    • [16] J.J.Q. Yu, V.O.K. Li, A social spider algorithm for global optimization, Appl. Soft Comput. 30 (2015) 614-627.
    • [17] W.T. Pan, A new fruit fly optimization algorithm: taking the financial distress model as an example, Knowl.-Based Syst. 26 (1) (2012) 69-74.
    • [18] F. Bartumeus, M.G.E.d. Luz, G.M. Viswanathan, J. Catalan, Animal search strategies: A quantitative random walk analysis, Ecology 86 (11) (2005) 3078-3087.
    • [19] A.M. Reynolds, M.A. Frye, Free-flight odor tracking in Drosophila is consistent with an optimal intermittent scale-free search, PLoS ONE 2 (4) (2007) e354.
    • [20] S.M. Lin, Analysis of service satisfaction in web auction logistics service using a combination of fruit fly optimization algorithm and general regression neural network, Neural Comput. Appl. 22 (3-4) (2013) 783-791.
    • [21] W. Sheng, Y. Bao, Fruit fly optimization algorithm based fractional order fuzzy-PID controller for electronic throttle, Nonlinear Dynam. 73 (1-2) (2013) 611-619.
    • [22] J.Q. Li, Q.K. Pan, K. Mao, P.N. Suganthan, Solving the steelmaking casting problem using an effective fruit fly optimisation algorithm, Knowl.-Based Syst. 72 (2014) 28-36.
    • [23] J.Y. Zhao, X.F. Yuan, Multi-objective optimization of stand-alone hybrid PV-wind-diesel-battery system using improved fruit fly optimization algorithm, Soft Comput. (2015), doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1685-6.
    • [24] Y. Xing, Design and optimization of key control characteristics based on improved fruit fly optimization algorithm, Kybernetes 42 (3) (2013) 466-481.
    • [25] W.T. Pan, Using modified fruit fly optimisation algorithm to perform the function test and case studies, Connect. Sci. 25 (2-3) (2013) 151-160.
    • [26] L. Wang, X.L. Zheng, S.Y. Wang, A novel binary fruit fly optimization algorithm for solving the multidimensional knapsack problem, Knowl.-Based Syst. 48 (2013) 17-23.
    • [27] X. Yuan, X. Dai, J. Zhao, Q. He, On a novel multi-swarm fruit fly optimization algorithm and its application, Appl. Math. Comput. 233 (2014) 260-271.
    • [28] D.X. Yang, G. Li, G. D.Cheng, On the efficiency of chaos optimization algorithms for global optimization, Chaos Soliton Fractal 34 (4) (2007) 1366-1375.
    • [29] D.X. Yang, Z.J. Liu, J.L. Zhou, Chaos optimization algorithms based on chaotic maps with different probability distribution and search speed for global optimization, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19 (4) (2014) 1229-1246.
    • [30] M. Wan, C. Wang, L.X. Li, Y.X. Yang, Chaotic ant swarm approach for data clustering, Appl. Soft Comput. 12 (8) (2012) 2387-2393.
    • [31] X. Yuan, J. Zhao, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, Hybrid parallel chaos optimization algorithm with harmony search algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput. 17 (2014) 12-22.
    • [32] X. Yuan, S. Li, Y. Wang, W. Sun, L. Wu, Parameter identification of electronic throttle using a hybrid optimization algorithm, Nonlinear Dynam. 63 (4) (2011) 549-557.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article