LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hunt, K.J.; Ferrario, C.; Grant, S.; Stone, B.; McLean, A.N.; Fraser, M.H.; Allen, D.B. (2006)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: T1
Aim

\ud The energy efficiency of FES-cycling in spinal cord injured subjects is very much lower than that of normal cycling, and efficiency is dependent upon the parameters of muscle stimulation. We investigated measures which can be used to evaluate the effect on cycling performance of changes in stimulation parameters, and which might therefore be used to optimise them. We aimed to determine whether oxygen cost and stimulation cost measurements are sensitive enough to allow discrimination between the efficacy of different activation ranges for stimulation of each muscle group during constant-power cycling.

\ud \ud Methods

\ud We employed a custom FES-cycling ergometer system, with accurate control of cadence and stimulated exercise workrate. Two sets of muscle activation angles (“stimulation patterns”), denoted “P1” and “P2”, were applied repeatedly (eight times each) during constant-power cycling, in a repeated measures design with a single paraplegic subject. Pulmonary oxygen uptake was measured in real time and used to determine the oxygen cost of the exercise. A new measure of stimulation cost of the exercise is proposed, which represents the total rate of stimulation charge applied to the stimulated muscle groups during cycling. A number of energy-efficiency measures were also estimated.

\ud \ud Results

\ud Average oxygen cost and stimulation cost of P1 were found to be significantly lower than those for P2 (paired t-test, p < 0.05): oxygen costs were 0.56 ± 0.03 l min−1 and 0.61 ± 0.04 l min−1(mean ± S.D.), respectively; stimulation costs were 74.91 ± 12.15 mC min−1 and 100.30 ± 14.78 mC min−1 (mean ± S.D.), respectively. Correspondingly, all efficiency estimates for P1 were greater than those for P2.

\ud \ud Conclusion

\ud Oxygen cost and stimulation cost measures both allow discrimination between the efficacy of different muscle activation patterns during constant-power FES-cycling. However, stimulation cost is more easily determined in real time, and responds more rapidly and with greatly improved signal-to-noise properties than the ventilatory oxygen uptake measurements required for estimation of oxygen cost. These measures may find utility in the adjustment of stimulation patterns for achievement of optimal cycling performance.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [2] T. J. Barstow, A. M. E. Scremin, D. L. Mutton, C. F. Kunkel, T. C. Cagle, and B. J. Whipp, \Changes in gas-exchange kinetics with training in patients with spinal cord injury," Med. Sci. Sports Exer., vol. 28, pp. 1221{1228, 1996.
    • [3] T. Mohr, J. Podenphant, F. Biering-Sorensen, H. Galbo, G. Thamsborg, and M. Kjaer, \Increased bone mineral density after prolonged electrically induced cycle training of paralyzed limbs in spinal cord injured man," Calcif. Tissue Int., vol. 61, no. 19, pp. 22{25, 1997.
    • [4] T. W. J. Janssen, R. M. Glaser, and D. B. Shuster, \Clinical e cacy of electrical stimulation exercise training: E ects on health, tness, and function," Top. Spinal Cord Injury Rehab., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 33{49, 1998.
    • [5] J. S. Petrofsky, H. Heaten, and C. A. Phillips, \Outdoor bicycle for exercise in paraplegics and quadriplegics," J. Biomed. Eng., vol. 5, pp. 292{296, October 1983.
    • [6] D. J. Pons, C. L. Vaughan, and G. G. Jaros, \Cycling device powered by the electrically stimulated muscles of paraplegics," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 27, pp. 1{7, January 1989.
    • [7] M. Gfohler, M. Loicht, and P. Lugner, \Exercise tricycle for paraplegics," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 36, pp. 118{121, 1998.
    • [8] T. A. Perkins, N. Donaldson, N. A. C. Hatcher, I. D. Swain, and D. E. Wood, \Control of leg-powered paraplegic cycling using stimulation of the lumbo-sacral anterior spinal nerve roots," IEEE Trans. Neural Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 158{164, September 2002.
    • [9] K. J. Hunt, T. Schauer, N.-O. Negard, W. Stewart, and M. H. Fraser, \A pilot study of lower-limb FES cycling in paraplegia," in Proc. 7th Ann. Conf. Int. Functional Electrical Stimulation Society, (Ljubljana, Slovenia), 2002.
    • [10] R. M. Glaser, S. F. Figoni, S. P. Hooker, M. M. Rodgers, B. N. Ezenwa, A. G. Suryaprasad, S. C. Gupta, and T. Mathews, \E ciency of FNS leg cycle ergometry," in Proc. 11th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., pp. 961{963, 1989.
    • [11] J. Raymond, G. M. Davis, and M. van der Plas, \Cardiovascular responses during submaximal electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling in individuals with paraplegia," Clin. Physiol. Func. Imaging, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 92{98, 2002.
    • [12] D. Theisen, C. Fornusek, J. Raymond, and G. M. Davis, \External power output changes during prolonged cycling with electrical stimulation," J. Rehab. Med., vol. 34, pp. 171{175, 2002.
    • [13] R. M. Glaser, \Physiology of functional electrical stimulation-induced exercise: Basic science perspective," J. Neuro. Rehab., vol. 5, pp. 49{61, 1991.
    • [14] T. Martin, R. Stein, P. Hoeppner, and D. Reid, \In uence of electrical stimulation on the morphological and metabolic properties of paralyzed muscle," J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 72, pp. 1401{1406, 1992.
    • [15] M. Kjaer, G. Perko, N. H. Secher, R. Boushel, N. Beyer, S. Pollack, A. Horn, A. Fernandes, T. Mohr, S. F. Lewis, and H. Galbo, \Cardiovascular and ventilatory responses to electrically induced cycling with complete epidural anaesthesia in humans," Acta Physiol. Scand., vol. 151, pp. 199{207, 1994.
    • [16] P. Eser, N. Donaldson, H. Knecht, and E. Stussi, \In uence of di erent stimulation frequencies on power output and fatigue during FES-cycling in recently injured SCI people," IEEE Trans. Neur. Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 236{240, 2003.
    • [17] J. S. Petrofsky, C. A. Phillips, J. Almeyda, R. Briggs, W. Couch, and W. Colby, \Aerobic trainer with physiological monitoring for exercise in paraplegic and quadriplegic patients," J. Clin. Eng., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 307{316, 1985.
    • [18] J. S. Petrofsky and J. Smith, \Three wheel cycle ergometer for use by men and women with paralysis," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 30, pp. 364{369, 1992.
    • [19] J. S. Petrofsky, \New algorithm to control a cycle ergometer using electrical stimulation," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 41, pp. 18{27, 2003.
    • [20] G. C. Jang, J. J. Chen, C. T. Shih, and T. C. Huseh, \Design of FES-cycling system and its stimulation patterns," Chinese J. Med. Bio. Eng., vol. 13, pp. 305{316, December 1993.
    • [21] M. Gfohler and P. Lugner, \Cycling by means of functional electrical stimulation," IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 8, pp. 233{243, June 2000.
    • [22] J. Rasmussen, S. T. Christensen, M. Gfohler, M. Damsgaard, and T. Angeli, \Design optimization of a pedalling mechanism for paraplegics," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., vol. 26, pp. 132{138, 2004.
    • [23] E. S. Ids , T. A. Johansen, and K. J. Hunt, \Finding the metabolically optimal stimulation pattern for FES-cycling," in Proc. 9th Ann. Conf. Int. Functional Electrical Stimulation Soc., (Bournemouth, England), pp. 239{241, 2004.
    • [24] M. Gfohler and P. Lugner, \Dynamic simulation of FES-cycling: in uence of individual parameters," IEEE Trans. Neur. Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 12, pp. 398{405, December 2004.
    • [25] M. Gfohler, T. Angeli, T. Eberharter, P. Lugner, W. Mayr, and C. Hofer, \Test Bed with Force-Measuring Crank for Static and Dynamic Investigations on Cycling by Means of Functional Electrical Stimulation," IEEE Trans. Neur. Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 9, pp. 169{ 179, June 2001.
    • [26] K. J. Hunt, B. Stone, N.-O. Negard, T. Schauer, M. H. Fraser, A. J. Cathcart, C. Ferrario, S. A. Ward, and S. Grant, \Control strategies for integration of electric motor assist and functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic cycling: utility for exercise testing and mobile cycling," IEEE Trans. Neural Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 12, pp. 89{101, March 2004.
    • [27] T. J. Barstow, A. M. E. Scremin, D. L. Mutton, C. F. Kunkel, T. G. Cagle, and B. J. Whipp, \Peak and kinetic cardiorespiratory responses during arm and leg exercise in patients with SCI," Spinal Cord, vol. 38, pp. 340{345, 2000.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article