LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Whyte, Jennifer; Lobo, Sunila (2010)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
A major infrastructure project is used to investigate the role of digital objects in the coordination of engineering\ud design work. From a practice-based perspective, research emphasizes objects as important in enabling\ud cooperative knowledge work and knowledge sharing. The term ‘boundary object’ has become used in the\ud analysis of mutual and reciprocal knowledge sharing around physical and digital objects. The aim is to extend\ud this work by analysing the introduction of an extranet into the public–private partnership project used to\ud construct a new motorway. Multiple categories of digital objects are mobilized in coordination across\ud heterogeneous, cross-organizational groups. The main findings are that digital objects provide mechanisms for\ud accountability and control, as well as for mutual and reciprocal knowledge sharing; and that different types of\ud objects are nested, forming a digital infrastructure for project delivery. Reconceptualizing boundary objects as\ud a digital infrastructure for delivery has practical implications for management practices on large projects and\ud for the use of digital tools, such as building information models, in construction. It provides a starting point\ud for future research into the changing nature of digitally enabled coordination in project-based work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bechky, B A (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 720-52.
    • Blackler, F and Engeström, Y (2005) Special issue on the rise of objects in the study of organizations. Organization, 12(3).
    • Boland, R J, Lyytinen, K and Yoo, Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631-47.
    • Bowker, G and Star, S L (1999) Sorting Things Out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Cacciatori, E (2008) Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Research Policy, 37(9), 1591-601.
    • Carlile, P R (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-55.
    • Harvey F and Chrisman N (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology, Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1683-94.
    • Henderson, K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16(4), 448-73.
    • Jarzabkowski, P and Seidl, D (2008) The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391-426.
    • Knorr Cetina, K (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Lawrence, P R and Lorsch, J W (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-30.
    • Leonardi, P M and Bailey, D E (2008) Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 411-36.
    • Levina, N and Vaast, E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for the implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335-63.
    • Orlikowski, W J (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-48.
    • Pettigrew, A M (1985) Contextualist research and the study of organizational change process. In: Mumford, E, Hirschheim, R, Fitzgerald, G and Wood-Harper, A T (Eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems, pp. 53-78. Oxford, UK: New Holland.
    • Pettigrew, A M, Woodman, R W and Cameron, K S (2001) Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697-713.
    • Pipek, V and Wulf, V (2009) Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 447-73.
    • Rheinberger, H-J (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Sapsed, J and Salter, A J (2004) Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1515-34.
    • Shen, G, Brandon, P and Baldwin, A (Eds.) (2009) Collaborative Construction Information Management. London, UK: Spon.
    • Star, S L and Griesemer, J R (1989) Institutional ecology, „translations‟, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley‟s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907 - 1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
    • Taylor, J E (2007) Antecedents of successful three-dimensional computer-aided design implementation in design and construction networks. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 133(12), 993-1002.
    • Thomas, R, Hardy, C and Sargent, L (2007) Artifacts in Interaction: The production and politics of boundary objects, Advanced Institute of Management (AIM) Research Paper 052, London, UK: AIM.
    • Trompette P and Vinck D (2009) Revisiting the notion of boundary object, Revue d‟Anthropologie des Connaissances, 3(1), 3-25.
    • Van Marrewijk, A, Clegg, S R, Pitsis, T S and Veenswijk, M (2008) Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6), 591-600.
    • Whyte, J K, Ewenstein, B, Hales, M and Tidd, J (2007) Visual practices, and the objects of design. Building Research and Information, 35(1), 18-27.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article