LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gordon, Dan; Baker,James; Roberts,Justin; Basevitch,Itay; Merzbach,Viviane; Scruton,Adrian (2015)
Publisher: Dove Press
Journal: Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: exercise testing, children, Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, effort regulation, Sports medicine, RC1200-1245, Original Research, perception
Adrian Scruton, James Baker, Justin Roberts, Itay Basevitch, Viviane Merzbach, Dan Gordon Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK Abstract: To assess pacing accuracy in a group of adolescent swimmers during an incremental step test. Fifteen well-trained swimmers (age 15±1.5 years; height 170.2±8.8 cm; mass 60.2±6.6 kg), completed two 7×200 m tests, separated by ~72 hours. They swam to a predetermined incrementally increasing pace per step and were instructed to swim at even pace. Upon completion of each step, rating of perceived exertion, heart rate and blood lactate were recorded. Significant differences observed for both trials between actual and predicted swim time (P<0.05). Significant differences also observed between the first and second 100 m of each step in trial 1 for step 1 (P=0.001, effect size [ES] =0.54), step 2 (P=0.0001, ES =0.57), step 4 (P=0.0001, ES =0.53), step 5 (P=0.005, ES =0.65), step 6 (P=0.0001, ES =0.50), and step 7 (P=0.0001, ES =0.70). Similar responses witnessed for trial 2 (P<0.05). Findings suggest that the finite anaerobic capacity was engaged sooner than would normally be anticipated, as a function of an inability to regulate pace. This is proposed to be a consequence of the volume of exposure to the biological and psychological sensations and cognitive developmental status. Given the apparent error in pacing judgment exhibited in this population group, caution should be applied when adopting such tests to monitor training responses with adolescent athletes, and alternate means of modulating pace be investigated. Keywords: effort regulation, children, exercise testing, perception
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Chinnasamy C, St Clair Gibson A, Micklewright D. Effect of spatial and temporal cues on athletic pacing in schoolchildren. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2013;45:395-402.
    • 2. Foster C, De Koning JJ, Hettinga F, Lampen J. Effect of competitive distance on energy expenditure during simulated competition. Int J Sport Med. 2004;25:198-204.
    • 3. Stone MR, Thomas K, Wilkinson M, Jones AM, St Clair Gibson A, Thompson KG. Effects of deception on exercise performance: implications for determinants of fatigue in humans. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012;44:534-541.
    • 4. Hampson DB, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. The inuflence of sensory cues on the perception of exertion during exercise and central regulation of exercise performance. Sport Med. 2001;31:935-952.
    • 5. Tucker R, Noakes TD. The anticipatory regulation of performance: the physiological basis for pacing strategies and the development of a perception-based model for exercise performance. Br J Sport Med. 2009;43:392-400.
    • 6. Green MJ, Sapp AL, Pritchett RC, Bishop PA. Pacing accuracy in collegiate and recreational runners. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:567-572.
    • 7. Micklewright D, Angus C, Suddaby J, St Clair Gibson A, Sandercock G, Chinnasamy C. Pacing strategy in schoolchildren differs with age and cognitive development. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012;44:362-369.
    • 8. Skorski S, Faude O, Rausch K, Meyer T. Reproducibility of pacing proifles in competitive swimmers. Int J Sport Med. 2012;34:152-157.
    • 9. Foster C, Schrager M, Snyder AC, Thompson NN. Effect of pacing strategy on cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1993;25:383-388.
    • 10. Foster C, Schrager M, Snyder AC, Thompson NN. Pacing strategy and athletic performance. Sport Med. 1994;17:77-85.
    • 11. Hettinga FJ, De Koning JJ, Broerson FT, Van Geffen P, Foster C. Pacing strategy and the occurrence of fatigue in 4000-m cycling time trials. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2006;38:1484-1491.
    • 12. Davis JA. Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1985;17:6-12.
    • 13. Fry L, Londeree B, Lafontaine T, Volek MR. Physiological parameters related to distance running performance in female athletes. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1989;21:319.
    • 14. Zoladz JA, Sargeant AJ, Emmerich J, Stoklosa J, Zychowski A. Changes in acid-base status of marathon runners during an incremental efild test: relationship to mean competitive marathon velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1993;67:71-76.
    • 15. Lakomy HKA, Peyrebrune MC. Aerobic Fitness Assessment: 7×200-m Step Test. Loughborough: British Swimming; 2003
    • 16. Pyne D, Maw G, Goldsmith W. Protocols for the physiological assessment of swimmers. In: Gore C, editor. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2000:372-382.
    • 17. Gordon D, Caddy O, Merzbach V, et al. Prior knowledge of trial number influences the incidence of plateau at VO 2max. J Sport Sci Med. 2015;14:47-53.
    • 18. MaugerA. Factors affecting the regulation of pacing: current perspectives. Open Access J Sport Med. 2014;5:209-214.
    • 19. Piaget J. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Hum Dev. 1972;15:1-12.
    • 20. de Koning JJ, Foster C, Bakkum, et al. Regulation of pacing during athletic competition. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e15863. doi:10.137/journal. pone0015863.
    • 21. Foster C, Hendrickson KJ, Peyer K. Pattern of developing the performance template. Br J Sport Med. 2009;43:765-769.
    • 22. Essen B, Hagenfeldt L, Kaijser L. Utilisation of blood borne and intramuscular substrates during continuous and intermittent exercise in man. J Physiol. 1976;265:489-505.
    • 23. Corbett J, Barwood MJ, Parkhouse K. Effect of task familiarisation on distribution of energy during a 2000-m cycling time trial. Br J Sport Med. 2009;43:770-774.
    • 24. Lavoie JM, Leger LA, Leone M, Provencher PJ. A maximal multistage swim test to determine the functional and maximal aerobic power of competitive swimmers. J Swim Res. 1985;1:17-22.
    • 25. Sano S, Bongbele J, Chatard JC, Lavoie JM. Evaluation of maximal aerobic velocity and prediction of performance in backstroke. In: MacLaren DP, Reilly T, Lees A, editors. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming: Swimming Science VI. London: E and FN Spon; 1990:285-288.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.