LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Eccles, Martin P; Hrisos, Susan; Francis, Jill; Kaner, Eileen F; Dickinson, Heather O; Beyer, Fiona; Johnston, Marie (2006)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: Implementation Science
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Health Policy, R5-920, Medicine (General), Medicine(all), Systematic Review, RA, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Abstract

Background

Implementation research is the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of clinical research findings into routine clinical practice. Several interventions have been shown to be effective in changing health care professionals' behaviour, but heterogeneity within interventions, targeted behaviours, and study settings make generalisation difficult. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the 'active ingredients' in professional behaviour change strategies. Theories of human behaviour that feature an individual's "intention" to do something as the most immediate predictor of their behaviour have proved to be useful in non-clinical populations. As clinical practice is a form of human behaviour such theories may offer a basis for developing a scientific rationale for the choice of intervention to use in the implementation of new practice. The aim of this review was to explore the relationship between intention and behaviour in clinicians and how this compares to the intention-behaviour relationship in studies of non-clinicians.

Methods

We searched: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science/Social science citation index, Current contents (social & behavioural med/clinical med), ISI conference proceedings, and Index to Theses. The reference lists of all included papers were checked manually. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they had: examined a clinical behaviour within a clinical context, included measures of both intention and behaviour, measured behaviour after intention, and explored this relationship quantitatively. All titles and abstracts retrieved by electronic searching were screened independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by discussion.

Discussion

Ten studies were found that examined the relationship between intention and clinical behaviours in 1623 health professionals. The proportion of variance in behaviour explained by intention was of a similar magnitude to that found in the literature relating to non-health professionals. This was more consistently the case for studies in which intention-behaviour correspondence was good and behaviour was self-reported. Though firm conclusions are limited by a smaller literature, our findings are consistent with that of the non-health professional literature. This review, viewed in the context of the larger populations of studies, provides encouragement for the contention that there is a predictable relationship between the intentions of a health professional and their subsequent behaviour. However, there remain significant methodological challenges.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote implementation of research findings by health care professionals. BMJ 1998, 317:465-468.
    • 2. Oxman AD: No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to help health care professionals deliver services more effectively or efficiently. Hamilton,Ontario, McMaster University; 1994.
    • 3. Foy R, Eccles M, Jamtvedt G, Grimshaw J, Baker R: What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 2005, 5:50-50.
    • 4. Walker A, Grimshaw JM, Johnston M, Pitts N, Steen N, Eccles MP: PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research:selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice. BMC Health Services Research 2003, 3:22-22.
    • 5. Bonetti D, Eccles M, Johnston M, Steen IN, Grimshaw J, Baker R, Walker A, Pitts N: Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60:2135-2147.
    • 6. Ajzen I: The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211.
    • 7. Godin G, Kok R: The theory of planned behaviour: a review of its applications to health-related behaviours. American Journal of Health Promotion 1996, 11:87-98.
    • 8. Armitage CJ, Conner M: Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:471-499.
    • 9. Sheeran P: Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In European Review of Social Psychology Edited by: Stroebe W and Hewstone M. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2002:1-36.
    • 10. Webb TL, Sheeran P: Does Changing Behavioural Intention Engender Behaviour Change? A Meta-analysis of the Experimental Evidence. Psychol Bull 2006, 132:249-268.
    • 11. Sheeran P, Abraham C: Mediator of moderators: temporal stability of intention and the intention-behavior relation. Society for Personaility and Social Psychology 2003, 29:205-215.
    • 12. Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol 1999, 54:493-503.
    • 13. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R: Bridging the intentionbehaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health 2005, 20:143-160.
    • 14. Marteau TM, Johnston M: Health professionals: a source of variance in health outcomes. Psychol Health 1990, 5:47-58.
    • 15. Streiner DL, Norman GR: . In Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1989.
    • 16. Millstein SG: Utility of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior for predicting physician behavior: a prospective analysis. Health Psychol 1996, 15:398-402.
    • 17. Farris KB, Schopflocher DP: Between intention and behavior: an application of community pharmacists' assessment of pharmaceutical care. Social Science & Medicine 1999, 49:55-66.
    • 18. Godin G, Naccache H, Morel S, Ebacher MF: Determinants of nurses' adherence to universal precautions for venipunctures. Journal of Infection Control 2000, 28:359-364.
    • 19. Hoppe CRG: Predicting health professionals management of obesity. 1999.
    • 20. O'Boyle CA, Henly SJ, Larson E: Understanding adherence to hand hygiene recommendations: the theory of planned behavior. American Jorunal of Infection Control 2001, 29:352-360.
    • 21. Lambert BL, Salmon JW, Stubbings J, Gilomen-Study G, Valuck RJ, Kezlarian K: Factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in a managed care setting: an exploratory investigation. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45:1767-1779.
    • 22. Bernaix LW: Nurses' attitudes, subjective norms, and behavioral intentions toward support of breastfeeding mothers. Journal of Human Lactation 2000, 16:201-209.
    • 23. Renfroe DH, O'Sullivan PS, McGee GW: The relationship of attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intent to the documentation behavior of nurses. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice 1990, 4:47-60.
    • 24. Harrell DD, Bennett PD: An evaluation of the expectancy value model of attitude measurement for physician prescribing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 1974, 11:269-278.
    • 25. Quinn RM: Attitude, subjective norm, behavioral intention, and patient teaching among nurses. Temple University ED, v. D.; 1996.
    • 26. Ajzen I, Fishbein M: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall; 1980.
    • 27. Triandis HC: Interpersonal behavior Monteray, CA, Brooks/Cole; 1977.
    • 28. Bagozzi RP: The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions and behaviour. Social Psychology Quarterly 1992, 55:178-204.
    • 29. Cohen J: A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992, 112:155-159.
    • 30. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N: Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:107-112.
    • 31. The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science 2006, 1:4.
    • 32. The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science 2006, 1:4.
    • 33. Eccles M, Foy R, Bamford C, Hughes J, Whitty P, Steen N, Grimshaw J: A trial platform to develop a tailored theory based intervention to improve professional practice in the disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. Implementation Science 2006 in press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article