Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Westwood, D; Griffiths, MD (2010)
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

Until recently, there has been very little naturalistic study of what gaming experiences are like, and how gaming fits into people’s lives. Using a recently developed structural characteristic taxonomy of video games, this study examined the psycho-structural elements of computer games that motivate gamers to play them. Using Q-Sort methodology, 40 gamers participated in an online Q-sort task. Results identified six distinct types of gamers based on the factors generated: (a) story-driven solo gamers; (b) social gamers; (c) solo limited gamers; (d) hardcore online gamers; (e) solo control=identity gamers; and (f ) casual gamers. These gaming types are discussed, and a brief evaluation of similar and unique elements of the different types of gamer is also offered. The current study shows Q-methodology to be a relevant and applicable method in the psychological research of gaming.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Jansz J, Tanis M. Appeal of playing online first person shooter games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:133-6.
    • 2. Kim Y, Ross S. An exploration of motives in sporting video gaming. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship 2006. Available online: http:==www.imrpublications .com=JSMS=index.cgi?type¼sumabs&vol¼8&num¼1&pap¼ 3& id¼149 (accessed Oct. 23, 2009).
    • 3. Wood RTA, Griffiths MD, Chappell D, et al. The structural characteristics of video games: A psycho-structural analysis. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2004; 7:1-10.
    • 4. King D, Delfabbro P, Griffiths MD. Video game structural characteristics: A new psychological taxonomy. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction 2009. DOI: 10.1007=s11469-009-9206-4.
    • 5. Cross RM. Exploring attitudes: The case for Q-methodology. Health Education Research Theory & Practice 2005; 20:206- 13.
    • 6. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2005; 2:67-91.
    • 7. Vorderer P, Hartmann T, Klimmt C. (2003) Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: The role of competition. In Marinelli P, ed. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC 2003). Pittsburgh, NY: ACM, pp. 1-8.
    • 8. Sherry J, Lucas K, Greenberg B, et al. (2004) Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In Vorderer P, Jennings B, eds. Playing video games: Motives responses and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 213-24.
    • 9. Wood RTA, Griffiths MD, Parke A. Experiences of time loss among videogame players: An empirical study. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:45-56.
    • 10. Salen K, Zimmerman E. (2004) Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article