LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Attfield, Simon; Makri, Stephann; Kalbach, James; Blandford, Ann; De Gabrielle, Stephen; Edwards, Mark (2008)
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The reinterpretation of the traditional reference service in an online context is the virtual reference desk. Placing reference services into an online setting, however, presents many challenges. We report a study and analytic framework which addresses support for decision-making during virtual enquiry work. Focusing on specialist law-libraries, the study shows that enquirers do not volunteer important information to the service and that asynchronous communication media and some social obstacles present barriers to prompting. Also, previous enquiries are frequently used to inform current enquiry strategies but barriers exist in accessing this information. We conclude that email is an inadequate medium for supporting virtual reference services, and that system should support automatic, speculative matching between new enquiry content and integrated enquiry knowledge bases. The contribution of the framework is to offer a structured approach to evaluation in multiple virtual reference contexts and enable rapid convergence on barriers to efficient and effective service.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Borgman, C.L.: What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions. Inf. Proc. and Man. 35(3), 227--243 (1999)
    • 2. Marchionini, G., Fox, E.: Progress Towards Digital Libraries, Inf. Proc. and Man. 35(3), 219--225 (1999)
    • 3. Chowdury, G.G.: Digital Libraries and Reference Services: Present and Future. J. Doc., 58(3), 258--283 (2002)
    • 4. Bunge, C.A: Reference Services, Reference Librarian, 66, 185--99. (1999)
    • 5. Taylor, R.S.: Question-negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries. College and Research Libraries. 29, 178-94 (1968)
    • 6. Saracevic, T.: Modeling and measuring user-intermediary-computer interaction in online searching: Design of a study. Proc. of the Annual Meeting of ASIST, 33, 3--9. (1989)
    • 7. Dervin, B., Dewdney, P.: Neutral Questioning: A New Approach to the Reference Interview. RQ, 25, 506-513 (1986)
    • 8. Kuhlthau, C.C., Spink, A., Cool, C.: Exploration into Stages in the Information Search Process in On-line IR: Communication Between Users and Intermediaries. Proc. of the Annual Meeting of ASIST, 29, 67--71 (1992)
    • 9. Dewdney, P., Ross, C.S.: Flying a Light Aircraft: Reference Service Evaluation from a User's Viewpoint. RQ, 34, 217--30 (1994)
    • 10. Lankes, R.D.: The Digital Reference Research Agenda. JASIST, 55(4), 301--311. (2004)
    • 11. Altarama Reftracker. http://www.altarama.com.au/reftrack.htm, accessed 17/3/08.
    • 12. OCLC QuestionPoint. http://www.oclc.org/questionpoint/, accessed 7/3/08.
    • 13. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)
    • 14. Strauss, A. Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London. (1998)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article