Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lamb, Sarah E; Gates, Simon; Underwood, Martin R; Cooke, Matthew W; Ashby, Deborah; Szczepura, Ala; Williams, Mark A; Williamson, Esther M; Withers, Emma J; Mt Isa, Shahrul; Gumber, Anil; , (2007)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, RC925-935, Study Protocol, R1
Background: A substantial proportion of patients with whiplash injuries develop chronic\ud symptoms. However, the best treatment of acute injuries to prevent long-term problems is\ud uncertain. A stepped care treatment pathway has been proposed, in which patients are given advice\ud and education at their initial visit to the emergency department (ED), followed by review at three\ud weeks and physiotherapy for those with persisting symptoms. MINT is a two-stage randomised\ud controlled trial to evaluate two components of such a pathway: 1. use of The Whiplash Book versus\ud usual advice when patients first attend the emergency department; 2. referral to physiotherapy\ud versus reinforcement of advice for patients with continuing symptoms at three weeks.\ud Methods: Evaluation of the Whiplash Book versus usual advice uses a cluster randomised design\ud in emergency departments of eight NHS Trusts. Eligible patients are identified by clinicians in\ud participating emergency departments and are sent a study questionnaire within a week of their ED\ud attendance. Three thousand participants will be included. Patients with persisting symptoms three\ud weeks after their ED attendance are eligible to join an individually randomised study of\ud physiotherapy versus reinforcement of the advice given in ED. Six hundred participants will be\ud randomised. Follow-up is at 4, 8 and 12 months after their ED attendance. Primary outcome is the\ud Neck Disability Index (NDI), and secondary outcomes include quality of life and time to return to\ud work and normal activities. An economic evaluation is being carried out.\ud Conclusion: This paper describes the protocol and operational aspects of a complex intervention\ud trial based in NHS emergency and physiotherapy departments, evaluating two components of a\ud stepped-care approach to the treatment of whiplash injuries. The trial uses two randomisations,\ud with the first stage being cluster randomised and the second individually randomised.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. of the cervical whiplash syndrome Edited by: Gunzburg R, Szpalski M. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:283-290.
    • 2. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Whiplash injury: clinical review. Pain 1994, 58:283-307.
    • 3. Stovner LJ: The nosologic status of the whiplash syndrome: a critical review based on a methodological approach. Spine 1996, 21:2735-2746.
    • 4. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E: Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine 1995, 20(8 Suppl):1S-73S.
    • 5. Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GGM, de Bie RA, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA: Conservative treatments for whiplash. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004. Art. No.: CD003338. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003338.pub2.
    • 6. TSO: The Whiplash Book. London: The Stationery Office Ltd; 2002.
    • 7. McClune T, Burton AK, Waddell G: Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice. Emerg Med J 2002, 19:499-506.
    • 8. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C: A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 2001, 26:E445-458.
    • 9. Mayou R, Bryant B: Outcome of 'whiplash' neck injury. Injury 1996, 27:617-23.
    • 10. Hoving JL, Koes BW, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, van Mameren H, Deville WL, Pool JJ, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM: Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 136:713-22.
    • 11. Evans R, Bronfort G, Nelson B, Goldsmith CH: Two-year Followup of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation and two types of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 2002, 27:2383-2389.
    • 12. Kjellman G, Oberg B: A randomized clinical trial comparing general exercise, McKenzie treatment and a control group in patients with neck pain. J Rehabil Med 2002, 34:183-190.
    • 13. Sarig-Bahat H: Evidence for exercise therapy in mechanical neck disorders. Man Ther 2003, 8:10-20.
    • 14. Eldridge SM, Ashy D, Feder GS: Informed patient consent to participation in cluster randomized trials: an empirical exploration of trials in primary care. Clinical Trials 2005, 2:91-98.
    • 15. Maitland GD: Peripheral Manipulation 5th edition. Butterworth-Heinemann .
    • 16. Klaber Moffett J, Torgerson D, Bell-Syer S, Jackson D, Llewlyn-Phillips H, Farrin A, Barber J: Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. BMJ 1999, 319:279-83.
    • 17. Rosenfeld M, Gunnarsson R, Borenstein P: Early intervention in whiplash-associated disorders: a comparison of two treatment protocols. Spine 2000, 25:1782-7.
    • 18. Donner A, Klar N: Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research London: Arnold; 2000.
    • 19. Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G: Sub-group analyses in randomised controlled trial: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technol Assess 5(33):.
    • 20. Hunink MGM, Bult JR, deVries J, Weinstein MC: Uncertainty in decision models analysing cost-effectiveness: the joint distribution of incremental costs and effectiveness evaluated with a nonparametric bootstrap method. Medical Decision Making 1998, 18:337-346.
    • 21. Pocock SJ: Clinical trials: A Practical Approach Chichester: Wiley; 1983.
    • 22. Eldridge SM, Ashby D: Statistical Concepts London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2000.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.