Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
White, A. S.; Censlive, M.; Nielsen, D. (2014)
Publisher: Institute of Physics Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HE
This paper investigates how control theory could be applied to learning processes in engineering education. The initial point for the analysis is White’s Double Loop learning model of human automation control modified for the education process where a set of governing principals is chosen, probably by the course designer. After initial training the student decides unknowingly on a mental map or model. After observing how the real world is behaving, a strategy to achieve the governing variables is chosen and a set of actions chosen. This may not be a conscious operation, it maybe completely instinctive. These actions will cause some consequences but not until a certain time delay. The current model is compared with the work of Hollenbeck on goal setting, Nelson’s model of self-regulation and that of Abdulwahed, Nagy and Blanchard at Loughborough who investigated control methods applied\ud to the learning process.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Skinner, B.F. (1958) Teaching Machines, Science, Vol 128, No3330, 969-977.
    • [2] Houghton, W, (2004) Learning and Teaching Theory for Engineering Academics, Higher Education Academy, Engineering subject centre.
    • [3] Kolb, D (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as source of learning and development, Prentice-Hall.
    • [4] Engineering Council (1985) Standards and Routes to Registration (SARTOR). EC 10 Maltravers Street, London WC2R 3ER, England.
    • [5] Craik, K, (1943) Nature of Explanation, CUP
    • [6] Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (p. 7-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • [7] Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A Necessary Condition for the Goal Setting Performance Relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.62, pp.624-627.
    • [8] Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.30, pp.265-287.
    • [9] Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management, Vol.14, pp.150-172.
    • [10] Hollenbeck, J. (1989). Control Theory and the Perception of Work Environments: The Effects of Focus and Attention on Affective and Behavioral Reactions at Work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.43, pp.406-430
    • [11] Abdulwahed, M., Nagy, Z.K. and Blanchard, R.E., (2008). Constructivist project based learning design, a cybernetics approach. IN: Malpica, F. et al. (Eds). Proceedings of the 2nd International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics, (IMSCI 2008), June 29th - July 2nd, 2008
    • [12] Seri, P (2001) Losing areas and shared mental models: towards a definition of the cognitive obstacles to local development, DRUID Winter Conf. Copenhagen, 18-20 Jan.
    • [13] White, A. S. (2013) Human Supervision of Automated Systems and the Implications of Double Loop Learning, International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach, Vol.6, No.2, pp.13-21, July-December
    • [14] An, L, Jeng, J and Lee Y. M, (2007). “Effective Workforce Lifecycle management via System Dynamics Modeling and Simulation”, Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf., IEEE, pp.2187-2195
    • [15] Towill, D (1977) Exponential smoothing of learning curve data, Int.J.Prod. Res., Vol.15, No.1, pp.1-15.
    • [16] Santos, J.L., Klerkx, J., Duaval, E., Gago, D. and Rodriguez, L., (2014). Success, activity and drop-outs in MOOCs an exploratory study on the UNED COMA courses, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, ACM, NY, ISBN: 978-1-4503-2664-3 doi>10.1145/2567574.2567627 pp. 98-102
    • [17] Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daume, H., III and Getoor, L. (2014) Uncovering hidden engagement patterns for predicting learner performance in MOOCs, L@S '14: Proc.1st ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, pp. 157-158, ACM NY, ISBN: 978-1-4503- 2669-8 doi>10.1145/2556325.2567857
    • [18] Chen, P. and Chen Y. (2014) Facilitating MOOCs learning through weekly meet-up: a case study in Taiwan, L@S '14 Proc. 1st ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, pp. 183- 184, NY, ISBN: 978-1-4503-2669-8 doi>10.1145/2556325.2567872
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article