Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Charette, Monik (2006)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 3100
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barker, C. (1989). “Extrametricality, the cycle and Turkish word stress”, in Phonology at Santa Cruz 1, Itô, J. & J. Runner (eds.), Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Centre, 1-33.
    • Çakır Ç. (2000). “On non-final stress in Turkish simplex words”, Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages: Proceeding of the ninth international conference on Turkish Linguistics, Göksel, A. & C. Kerslake (eds.), Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. 3-10.
    • Charette, M. (2000). “When p-licensing fails: the final high vowels of Turkish”, SOAS Working papers in Linguistics 10. 2-18.
    • Charette, M. (2004). “Defining the structure of Turkish words”, SOAS Working papers in Linguistics 13.
    • Charette, M. & A. Göksel (1996). “Switching and vowel harmony in Turkic languages” in A Festschrift for Edmund Gussmann, KUL, Lublin. 29-56.
    • Charette, M. & A. Göksel (1998). “Licensing constraints and vowel harmony in Turkic languages”, in Structure and interpretation - studies in phonology, Cyran E. (ed.), PASE Studies and monographs, vol. 4, Lublin. 65-88.
    • Cyran, E. (2003). Complexity scales and licensing strength in phonology, Wydawnictwo, KUL, Lublin.
    • Denwood, A. (1998). “A template for Turkish”, SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics: 8:177-190.
    • Denwood, A. (2002). “k-ø: morpho-phonology in Turkish”, SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics: 12:89-98.
    • Denwood, A. (2005). “A template for Turkish, full circle: templates or syllables”, (ms).
    • Goh, Y. S. (1996). The segmental phonology of Beijing Mandarin, PhD dissertation, University of London. [also (1997) The Crane Publishing Co. Ltd., Tapei.]
    • Göksel, A. & C. Kerslake (2005). Turkish: a comprehensive grammar, Routledge.
    • Harris, J. & E. Gussmann (1998). “Final codas: why the west was wrong”, Structure and interpretation - Studies in phonology, Cyran, E. (ed), Pase studies & monographs vol.4. Lublin. 139-162.
    • Harris, J. & E. Gussmann (2002). “Word-final onsets”, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14:1-42.
    • Inkelas, S. & C. O. Orgun (1995). “Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish”, Language 71. 763-793.
    • Inkelas, S. & C. O. Orgun (1998). “Level non-ordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish”, in Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, Lapointe, S. G., D. K. Brentari & P. M. Farrell (eds.), Stanford: CSLI. 360-410.
    • Kabak, B. & I. Vogel. (2001). “The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish”, Phonology 18, COU 315-360.
    • Kaisse, E. (1985). “Some theoretical consequences of stress rules in Turkish”, CLS 21:1, 199-209.
    • Kaisse, E. (1986). “Towards a lexical phonology of Turkish”, in A Festschrift for Sol Saporta (Contreras, H., & F. Newmeyer (eds.), Noit Amrofer. 231-240.
    • Kaye, J. (1990). “'Coda' licensing”, Phonology 7.2, CUP.
    • Kaye, J. & E. Gussmann (1993). “Polish notes from a Dubrovnik café”, SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 427-462.
    • Lowenstamm, J. (1996) “CV as the only syllable type”, Current trends in phonology: models and methods, Durand, J. & B. Laks (eds), European studies research institute and Manchester: University of Salford, 419-441.
    • Lowenstamm, J. (1999). “The beginning of the word”, Phonologica: Syllables!? Rennison J. & K. Kühnhammer (eds), The Hague: Thesus. 153-166.
    • Rowicka, G. (1999). On ghost vowels: a strict CV approach, The Hague, Holland Academics Graphics.
    • Sezer, E. (1983). “On non-final stress in Turkish”, Journal of Turkish Studies 5. 61-69.
    • Szigetvári, P. (1999). VC Phonology: a theory of consonant lenition and phonotactics, Doctoral dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University/Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    • Van der Hulst, H. & J. van de Weijer. (1991). “Topics in Turkish phonology”, in Turkish linguistics today, (Boeschoten H., & L. Verhoeten (eds). 11-59.
    • Yoshida, Y. (1999). On pitch accent phenomena in Standard Japanese, Dissertation in Linguistics 1, SOAS.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article