Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Slade, SV; Davey, CJ; Shickle, D (2016)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential of using primary care optometry data to support ophthalmic public health, research and policy making. Methods: Suppliers of optometric electronic patient record systems (EPRs) were interviewed to gather information about the data present in commercial software programmes and the feasibility of data extraction. Researchers were presented with a list of metrics that might be included in an optometric practice dataset via a survey circulated by email to 102 researchers known to have an interest in eye health. Respondents rated the importance of each metric for research. A further survey presented the list of metrics to 2000 randomly selected members of the College of Optometrists. The optometrists were asked to specify how likely they were to enter information about each metric in a routine sight test consultation. They were also asked if data were entered as free text, menus or a combination of these. Results: Current EPRs allowed the input of data relating to the metrics of interest. Most data entry was free text. There was a good match between high priority metrics for research and those commonly recorded in optometric practice. Conclusions: Although there were plenty of electronic data in optometric practice, this was highly variable and often not in an easily analysed format. To facilitate analysis of the evidence for public health purposes a UK based minimum dataset containing standardised clinical information is recommended. Further research would be required to develop suitable coding for the individual metrics included. The dataset would need to capture information from all sectors of the population to ensure effective planning of any future interventions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Gibson-White A & Majeed A. The Wellcome Trust Report: moving forward the use of general practice electronic patient records for research. Inform Prim Care 2009; 17: 141-142.
    • 2. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Quality and Outcomes Framework - prevalence, achievements and exceptions report England, 2013-14, http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB15751/qof-1314-report.pdf, accessed 3/6/15.
    • 3. Majeed A, Evans N & Head P. What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice? BMJ 1997; 315: 1515-1519.
    • 4. Landes DP. Primary care orthodontic services: An audit of the equity of access for the populations of the North East and Cumbria 2006 to 2014. Summer 2014; Public Health England North East Centre.
    • 5. House of Commons Health Committee. The electronic patient record. Sixth report of session 2006-7. 13 September 2007;1:HC422-1. The Stationery Office Ltd, www.publications.parliament.co.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmhealth/ 422/422.pdf, accessed 12/8/15.
    • 6. Roberts J. Personal electronic health records: from biomedical research to people's health. Inform Prim Care 2009; 17: 255-260.
    • 7. Majeed A. Source, uses, strengths and limitations of data collected in primary care in England. Health Stat Q 2004; 21: 5-14.
    • 8. Campion-Awwad O, Hayton A, Smith L & Vuaran M. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: A Case History. February 2014, MPhil Public Policy, University of Cambridge.
    • 9. Health and Social Care Information Centre. General Ophthalmic Services activity statistics for England 2013-14. October 2014, http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/ PUB14494/gene-opht-serv-acti-13-14-report-v2.pdf, accessed 12/8/15.
    • 10. Robinson BE & Stolee P. Review of the Canadian association of optometrists frequency of eye examinations guideline - An evidence based approach, 2011; Final Report: University of Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
    • 11. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K & Healey PR. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1661-1669.
    • 12. Quigley HA & Vitale S. Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 83-91.
    • 13. Reidy A, Minassian DC, Vafidis G et al. Prevalence of serious eye disease and visual impairment in a north London population: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ 1998; 316: 1643-1646.
    • 14. Public health England. Public health outcomes framework: Healthcare and premature mortality 4.12, http://www.phoutcomes.info/public-health-outcomes framework#gid/ 1000044/pat/6/ati/102/page/1/nn//par/E12000002/are/ E06000008/iid/41201/age/27/sex/4, accessed 26/8/15.
    • 15. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital outpatient activity 2013-14, January 2015, http://www.hscic.- gov.uk/article/2021/WebsiteSearch?productid=17195&q=title%3a+%22hospital+outpatient+activity% 22&sort=Most+recent&size=10&page=1&area=both#top, accessed 26/8/15.
    • 16. College of Optometrists. Guidance for professional practice A20 - Patient records, 1st November 2014, http://guidance.- college-optometrists.org/guidance-contents/knowledgeskills-and-performance-domain/patient-records/, accessed 7/1/16.
    • 17. Quality in Optometry. GOS Record Monitoring: Auditing performer records, 2012; 7th April, http://www.qualityinoptometry.co.uk/documents/QiO_GOS_record_audit_guidance_070412.pdf, accessed 26/2/14.
    • 18. Directorate of Optometric Continuing Education and Training. On the record: Good practice in record keeping, 2009; 30th June, http://www.docet.info/filemanager/root/ site_assets/record_keeping_booklet.pdf, accessed 26/4/14.
    • 19. Warburton TJ. Staying out of trouble - will your record keeping help or hinder? Optom Today 2008; 28 of November 2008 pp 40-42, http://www.optometry.co.uk/ uploads/articles/RecordKeepingWARBURTON.pdf.
    • 20. World Health Organisation. ICD-10 International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 2004, Tenth revision vol2 2nd Edition WHO Geneva, http://apps.- who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42980/1/9241546530_eng.pdf, accessed 26/8/15.
    • 21. Joint Formulary Committee. British national Formulary. 2015; 69th Edition London BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press March.
    • 22. National Health Service General Ophthalmic Services contract regulations 2008 SI1185, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ uksi/2008/1185/pdfs/uksi_20081185_en.pdf, accessed 15/7/ 15.
    • 23. The National Health Service (General Ophthalmic Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 SI 135, http://www.legislation.- gov.uk/ssi/2006/135/made, accessed 15/7/15.
    • 24. Optical Confederation Optics at a Glance 2012 published November 2013, http://www.opticalconfederation.org. uk/downloads/key-statistics/optics-at-a-glance2012web.pdf, accessed 15/7/15.
    • 25. De Lusignan S. Using routinely collected patient data with and without consent: trust and professionalism. Inform Prim Care 2008; 16: 251-254.
    • 26. NHS England. Five year forward view. October 2014, https:// www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfvweb.pdf, accessed 26/1/2016.
    • 27. NHS England. NHS standard contract. Gateway reference 03175 March 2015, https://www.england.nhs.uk/nhs-standard-contract/15-16/, accessed 26/1/2016.
    • 28. NHS England. Care data guide for GP practices, https:// www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/cdguide.pdf, accessed 26/1/2016.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • WT

Cite this article