Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Woolf, C.; Panton, A.; Rosen, S.; Best, W.; Marshall, J. (2014)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: P1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: behavioral disciplines and activities, psychological phenomena and processes
Purpose: This study evaluated two forms of discrimination therapy for auditory processing impairment in aphasia. It aimed to determine whether therapy can improve speech perception and/or help participants use semantic information to compensate for their impairment. Changes in listening were also explored by recording the level of facilitation needed during therapy tasks. Finally the study examined the effect of therapy on an everyday listening activity: a telephone message task. \ud \ud Method: The study employed a repeated measures design. Eight participants received 12 sessions each of phonological and semantic-phonological therapy. Both programmes used minimal pair judgement tasks, but the latter embedded such tasks within a meaningful context, so encouraged the strategic use of semantic information (semantic bootstrapping). Experimental measures of auditory discrimination and comprehension were administered twice before therapy, once after each programme, and again six weeks later. The telephone message task was also administered at each time point. Test data were subjected to both group and individual analyses. Records of progress during therapy (i.e changes in support needed to carry out therapy tasks) were completed during treatment and analysed across the group. \ud \ud Results: Group analyses showed no significant changes in tests of word and nonword discrimination as a result of therapy. One comprehension task improved following therapy, but two did not. There was also no indication that therapy improved the discrimination of treated words, as assessed by a priming task. The facilitation scores indicated that participants needed less support during tasks as therapy progressed, possibly as a result of improved listening. There was a significant effect of time on the telephone message task. Across all tasks there were few individual gains. \ud \ud Conclusions: The results offer little evidence that therapy improved participants’ discrimination or semantic bootstrapping skills. Some changes in listening may have occurred, as indicated by the facilitation scores. Reasons for the null findings are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Archibald, L., Orange, J., & Jamieson, D. (2009) Implementation of computer-based language therapy in aphasia. Therapy Archives of Neurological Disorders, 2 (5), 299-311.
    • Basso, A., Casati, G., & Vignolo, L. A. (1977). Phonemic identification defect in aphasia. Cortex, 13, 1, 85-95.
    • Best, W., & Howard, D. (1994). Word sound deafness resolved? Aphasiology, 8(3), 223-256
    • Bhogal, S., Teasell, R. & Speechley, M. (2003). Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery. Stroke. 34, 987-993.
    • Blumstein, S. (1991). Phonological Aspects of Aphasia in M. Sarno (ed) Acquired Aphasia. 2nd Edition. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 151-180.
    • Blumstein, S. E. (1994). Impairments of speech production and speech perception in aphasia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences, 346, 1315, 29-36.
    • Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 325-340.
    • Fillingham, J.K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M.A. (2005). Treatment of anomia using errorless versus errorful learning: are frontal executive skills and feedback important? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 40 (4), 505-523.
    • Fillingham, J.K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M.A. (2005). Further explorations and an overview of errorless and errorful therapy for aphasic word-finding difficulties: the number of naming attempts during therapy affects outcome. Aphasiology, 19 (7), 597-614.
    • Francis, D. R., Riddoch, M. J. & Humphreys, G. W.(2001). Cognitive rehabilitation of word meaning deafness. Aphasiology, 15, 749-766.
    • Franklin, S. (1989). Dissociations in auditory word comprehension: Evidence from nine fluent aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 3, 189 - 207
    • Gieliewski, E. (1989). Acoustic analysis and auditory retraining in the remediation of sensory aphasia. In C. Code & D. J. Muller (Eds.), Aphasia therapy (pp. 138-145). London: Whurr.
    • Grayson, E., Franklin, S. & Hilton, R. (1997). Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia. Efficacy of language comprehension therapy during early intervention. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 257-276.
    • Hessler, D., & Stadie, N. (2008). War die störungsspezifische Therapie der auditiven Analyse effektiv? Eine Einzelfallstudie bei Aphasie. In M. Wahl, J. Heide, & S. Hanne (Eds.), Hessler, D., Jonkers, R. & Bastiaanse, R. (2010) The influence of phonetic dimensions on aphasic speech perception, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24, 12, 980-996 Howard, D. & Patterson, K. (1992). The Pyramids & Palm Trees Test. Pearson, UK.
    • Moineau, S., Dronkers, N., & Bates, E. (2005) Exploring the processing continuum of single-word comprehension in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48, 884 - 896.
    • Morris, J., Franklin, S., Ellis, A., Turner, J. & Bailey, P. (1996). Remediating a speech perception deficit in an aphasic patient. Aphasiology, 10, 2, 137-158.
    • Naeser, M., Hass, G., Mazurski, P. & Laughlin, S (1986) Sentence level auditory comprehension treatment program for aphasic adults. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 67, 393-399.
    • Pound, C., Parr, S., Lindsay, J. & Woolf, C. (2000). Beyond Aphasia: Therapies for living with communication disability. Bicester: Winslow Press
    • Raymer, A. & Gonzalez Rothi, L. (2008). Impairments of word production and comprehension. In R. Chapey (ed) Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic disorders, fifth edition. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
    • Riddoch, J. & Humphreys, G. (1993). Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove: Psychology Press.
    • Robson, H., Davies, S., Lambon-Ralph, M., & Sage, K. (2012) Facilitating and disrupting speech perception in word deafness. Aphasiology, 26, 2, 177-198.
    • Saffran, E. M., Marin, O. S., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (1976). An analysis of speech perception in word deafness. Brain and Language, 3, 2, 209-228.
    • Shindo, M., Kaga, K. & Tanaka, Y. (1991). Speech discrimination and lip reading in patients with word deafness or auditory agnosia. Brain and Language, 40, 153-161.
    • Snell, C., Sage, K., Lambon Ralph, M. (2010). How many words should we provide in anomia therapy? A meta-analysis and a case series study. Aphasiology, 24(9), 1064- 1096.
    • Stefanatos, G., Gershkoff, G., Madigan, S. (2005). On pure word deafness, temporal processing, and the left hemisphere. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 456-470.
    • Tessier, C., Weill-Chounlamountry, A., Michelot, N. & Pradat-Diehl, P. (2007). Rehabilitation of word deafness due to auditory analysis disorder. Brain Injury, 21, 1165 - 1174.
    • Varney, N. (1984). Phonemic Imperception in Aphasia. Brain and Language, 21, 85-
    • Whitworth, A., Webster, J. & Howard, D. (2014). A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach to Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia: A Clinician's Guide, Second Edition. Psychology Press.
    • Woolf, C. (2004). Effects of phonetic and linguistic factors on auditory processing: evidence from aphasic and normal listeners. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article