Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Roche, Brenda; Hefferon, Kate (2013)
Publisher: British Psychological Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Objectives: Despite extensive empirical evidence supporting the use of strengths, minimal research has been\ud conducted on the practical application of strengths tools. The objective of this study was to test the impact\ud of a structured debriefing following completion of Realise2, an online strengths assessment, in relation to\ud strengths application (Linley, Willars & Biswas-Diener, 2010).\ud Design: The study utilised a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were employed and thematic\ud analysis was used to identify themes representing the participant’s experience (Braun & Clarke, 2006).\ud Method: The 20 participants were a mixture of middle and senior managers from a global travel\ud organisation. All participants completed the Realise2 strengths assessment and a structured debriefing with\ud a qualified coach. Following the debriefing, each participant completed a semi-structured interview to\ud determine how the debriefing impacted their understanding and utilisation of the assessment findings.\ud Results: The results show that the debriefing was associated with engendering action, enhancing selfefficacy\ud and stimulating psychological development.\ud Conclusions: The study found that all 20 participants benefited from having a structured debriefing after\ud completing a strengths assessment. The debriefing led to a greater understanding and utilisation of the\ud strengths assessment. This pairing has practical implications for those involved in strengths-based coaching\ud and development. In addition, limitations of the study are discussed and areas for future research\ud suggested.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arnold, J. (1997). Managing careers into the 21st century. London: Paul Chapman.
    • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    • Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K.D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
    • Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). Personal coaching as a positive intervention. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 544-553.
    • Bono, J., Purvanova, R., Towler, A. & Peterson, D.B. (2009). A survey of executive coaching practices. Personnel Psychology, 62, 361-404.
    • Burke, D. & Linley, P.A. (2007). Enhancing goal selfconcordance through coaching. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(1), 62-69.
    • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
    • Corporate Leadership Council (2002). Performance management survey. Washington, DC: Author.
    • Clifton, D.O. & Harter, J.K. (2003). Strengths investment. In K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton & R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organisational scholarship (pp.111-121). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
    • Elston, F & Boniwell, I. (2011). A grounded theory study of value derived by women in financial services through a coaching intervention to help them identify their strengths and practice using them in the workplace. International Coaching Psychology Review, 6(1), 16-32.
    • Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broadenand-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
    • Frith, H. & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and using thematic analysis in psychology of appearance. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 40-48.
    • Gyllensten, K. & Palmer, S. (2006). Experiences of coaching and stress in the workplace: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Coaching Psychology Review, 1(1), 86-98.
    • Govindji, R. & Linley, P.A. (2007). Strengths use, selfconcordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 143-153.
    • Grant. A. (2003). The impact of life coaching on goal attainment, metacognition and mental health. Social Behaviour and Personality, 31(3), 253-264.
    • Grant, A. & Palmer, S. (2002). Coaching psychology. Presented at a meeting held at the Annual Conference of Division of Counselling Psychology, British Psychological Society, Torquay, 18 May.
    • Graham, S. & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.63-84). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
    • Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. & Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
    • Hill, J. (2001). How well do we know our strengths? Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Centenary Conference, Glasgow, April.
    • Kaufmann, C. & Linley, P.A. (2007). The meeting of the minds: Positive psychology and coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(1), 90-96.
    • Latham, G. & Locke, E. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting Research. European Psychologist, 12(4), 290-300.
    • Linley, P.A. (2008). Average to A+: Realising strengths in yourself and others. Coventry, UK: CAPP Press.
    • Linley, P.A., Nielsen, K.M., Wood, A.M., Gillett, R. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Using signature strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress, need satisfaction, and well-being, and implications for coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(1), 8-17.
    • Linley, P.A. & Harrington, S. (2006). Strengths coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 1(1), 37-46.
    • Linley, P.A., Woolston, L. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). Strengths coaching with leaders. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4(1), 37-48.
    • Luszcznska, A., Cao, D.S., Mallach, N., Pietron, K., Mazurkiewicz, M. & Schwarzer, R. (2010). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(2), 265-278.
    • Minhas, G. (2010). Developing realised and unrealised strengths: Implications for engagement, self-esteem, life satisfaction and well-being. Assessment and Development Matters, 2, 12-16.
    • Norcross, J.C. (2001). Empirically supported therapy relationships: Summary of the Division 29 Task Force. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 345-356.
    • Palmer, S. & Whybrow, A. (2005). The proposal to establish a special group in coaching psychology. The Coaching Psychologist, 1, 5-12.
    • Passmore, J. (2006). Excellence in coaching; The industry guide. London: Kogan Page.
    • Passmore, J. (2010). A grounded theory study of the coachee experience: The implications for training and practice in coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(1), 48-62.
    • Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. New York: Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    • Popper, M. & Lipshitz, R. (1992) Coaching on leadership. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 13(7)15-18.
    • Seligman, M., Steen, T., Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.
    • Seligman, M. (2007). Coaching and positive psychology. Australian Psychologist, 42, 266-267.
    • Sedikides, C. & Skowronski, J.J. (1995). On sources of self-knowledge: The perceived primacy of selfreflection. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 14(3), 244-270.
    • Sheldon, K. & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216-217.
    • Smith, J.A. (2008). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
    • Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. London: Open University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article