LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Swan, WC; Fitton, R; Brown, P
Publisher: Institution of Civil Engineers
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: built_and_human_env, energy
There is a growing body of evidence concerning the energy efficiency performance of domestic buildings in the UK, driven by policy-based agenda, such as the need for zero carbon dioxide homes by 2016 for new build homes, and Green Deal and energy company obligation for sustainable refurbishment. While there have been a number of studies funded and results presented in this area, little work has been done to understand the drivers, practices and issues of data collection and analysis. There are a number of major building performance evaluation (BPE) studies in the UK, yet behind many of these research projects are practical issues of data loss, experimental error, data analysis variances and resident issues that are common when studies move from the actual to the living lab. In this paper the issues of domestic energy are addressed by leading BPE practitioners in the UK. They identify issues of client demands, technical failure, costs and implementation. The work provides insights of both academic and industry-based practitioners and considers not only the practicalities of building performance studies, but also implications for these types of studies in the future.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, B. (2006). BR 443 Conventions for U Value Calculation. BRE. Watford, UK
    • Johnson, R. B., and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher 33(7): 14-26.
    • Osmani, M., & O'Reilly, A. (2009). Feasibility of zero carbon homes in England by 2016: a house builder's perspective. Building and Environment 44(9): 1917-1924.
    • Palmer, J., Cooper, I., Cheng, V., Summerton, P. and Cambridge Econometrics. (2011). Great Britain's housing energy fact file 2011. DECC, London, UK.
    • Shipworth, M., Firth, S.K., Gentry, M.I., Wright, A.J., Shipworth, D., and Lomas, K.J. (2010). Central heating thermostat settings and timing: building demographics. Building Research & Information 38(1), 50-69.
    • Stafford, A., Bell, M., and Gorse, C. (2012). Building Confidence - A working paper. The Centre for Low Carbon Futures, Leeds, UK
    • Sutton, R, Stafford, A. Gorse, C. (2012) The Coheating Test: The value of a number. International Energy Agency, Annex 58, Reliable Building Energy Performance Characterisation Based on Full Scale Dynamic Measurements. Bilbao, Spain, April 2 - 4th 2012.
    • Swan, W., Ruddock, L., Fitton, R, and Smith, L (2013) Adoption of sustainable retrofit in UK social housing. Structural Survey 31(3): 181-193.
    • Wenger, E. C., and Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard business review, 78(1): 139-146.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article