You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.
Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account.
An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.
Important!
Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version
of the site upon release.
We investigate properties of the most general PT-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian of cubic order in the annihilation and creation operators as a ten-parameter family. For various choices of the parameters we systematically construct an exact expression for a metric operator and an isospectral Hermitian counterpart in the same similarity class by exploiting the isomorphism between operator and Moyal products. We elaborate on the subtleties of this approach. For special choices of the ten parameters the Hamiltonian reduces to various models previously studied, such as to the complex cubic potential, the so-called Swanson Hamiltonian or the transformed version of the from below unbounded quartic −x4-potential. In addition, it also reduces to various models not considered in the present context, namely the single-site lattice Reggeon model and a transformed version of the massive sextic ±x6-potential, which plays an important role as a toy model to identify theories with vanishing cosmological constant.
[8] F. G. Scholtz, H. B. Geyer, and F. Hahne, Quasi-Hermitian Operators in Quantum Mechanics and the Variational Principle, Ann. Phys. 213, 74-101 (1992).
[11] H. Geyer, D. Heiss, and M. Znojil (guest editors), Special issue dedicated to the physics of non-Hermitian operators (PHHQP IV) (University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, 23-25 November 2005), J. Phys. A39, 9965-10261 (2006).
[13] C. Bender, Making Sense of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, arXiv:hep-th/0703096, to appear Rep. Prog. Phys.
[14] A. Fring, H. Jones, and M. Znojil (guest editors), Special issue dedicated to the physics of non-Hermitian operators (PHHQP VI) (City University London, UK, 16-18 July 2007), to appear, J. Phys. A (June, 2008).
[23] C. Quesne, Swanson's non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and su(1,1): a way towards generalizations, J. Phys. A40, F745-F751 (2007).
[24] C. M. Bender, J.-H. Chen, and K. A. Milton, PT-symmetric versus Hermitian formulations of quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A39, 1657-1668 (2006).
[25] M. S. Swanson, Transition elements for a non-Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 45, 585-601 (2004).
[26] H. Jones, On pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and their Hermitian counterparts, J. Phys. A38, 1741-1746 (2005).
[27] H. Jones and J. Mateo, An Equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian for the non-Hermitian −x4 Potential, Phys. Rev. D73, 085002 (2006).
[28] D. P. Musumbu, H. B. Geyer, and W. D. Heiss, Choice of a metric for the non-Hermitian oscillator, J. Phys. A40, F75-F80 (2007).
[29] J. B. Bronzan, J. A. Shapiro, and R. L. Sugar, Reggeon field theory in zero transverse dimensions, Phys. Rev. D14, 618-631 (1976).
[30] G. 't Hooft and S. Nobbenhuis, Invariance under complex transformations, and its relevance to the cosmological constant problem, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 3819-3832 (2006).
[31] D. B. Fairlie, Moyal brackets, star products and the generalised Wigner function, J. of Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 10, 365-371 (1999).
[32] R. Carroll, Quantum Theory, Deformation and Integrability, North-Holland Mathematics Studies 186, (Elsevier, Amsterdam) (2000).
[33] A. Mostafazadeh, Metric operators for quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians and symmetries of equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonians, arXiv:quant-ph/0707.3075v1.