Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pain, Matthew; Hibbs, Angela (2007)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C600
The simple auditory reaction time is one of the fastest reaction times and is thought to be rarely less than 100 ms. The current false start criterion in a sprint used by the International Association of Athletics Federations is based on this assumed auditory reaction time of 100 ms. However, there is evidence, both anecdotal and from reflex research, that simple auditory reaction times of less than 100 ms can be achieved. Reaction time in nine athletes performing sprint starts in four conditions was measured using starting blocks instrumented with piezoelectric force transducers in each footplate that were synchronized with the starting signal. Only three conditions were used to calculate reaction times. The pre-motor and pseudo-motor time for two athletes were also measured across 13 muscles using surface electromyography (EMG) synchronized with the rest of the system. Five of the athletes had mean reaction times of less than 100 ms in at least one condition and 20% of all starts in the first two conditions had a reaction time of less than 100 ms. The results demonstrate that the neuromuscular-physiological component of simple auditory reaction times can be under 85 ms and that EMG latencies can be under 60 ms.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Basmajian, J.V. (1978). Muscles Alive 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
    • Corcos, D.M., Gottlieb, G.L., Latash, M.L., Almeida, G.L. and Agarwal, G.C. (1992). Electromechanical delay: an experimental artifact. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2, 59-68.
    • Dapena, J. (2005). The "loud gun" starting system currently used at the Olympic games does not work properly. http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/features/2005/startproblem.html
    • De Wolf, D., Slijper, H. and Latash, M.L. Anticipatory postural adjustments during self-paced and reaction time movements. Experimental Brain Research 121, 7-19 (1998).
    • Guissard, N. and Duchateau, J. (1990). Electromyography of the sprint start. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 97-106.
    • Haas, E. C. and Edworthy, J. (2003). The Ergonomics of Sound. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica.
    • IAAF. (2003). Technical rules for international competitions. http://www.iaaf.org/newsfiles/23484.pdf
    • Julin, L. and Dapena, J. (2003) Sprinters at the 1996 Atlanta Olympic Games did not hear the starter's gun through the loudspeakers in the starting blocks. New Studies in Athletics 18, 23-27.
    • Kemp, E.H., Coppeé, G.E. and Robinson, E.H. (1937). Electric response of the brain stem to unilateral auditory stimulation. American Journal of Physiology, 120, 304.
    • Latash, M.L. (1998). Neurophysiological Basis of Movement. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois.
    • Mero, A. and Komi, P.V. (1990). Reaction time and electromyographic activity during a sprint start. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 61, 73-80.
    • Muller, T., Benz, S., Bornke, C. and Przuntek H. (2004). Differential response in choice reaction time following apomorphine based on prior dopaminergic treatment. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 109, 348-354.
    • Muraoka, T., Muramatsu, T., Fukunaga, T. and Kanehisa, H. J. (2004). Influence of tendon slack on electromechanical delay in the human medial gastrocnemius in vivo. Applied Physiology, 96, 540-544.
    • Omega, (2006). Athletics. http://www.omegawatches.com/index.php?id=322
    • Pain, M.T.G. (2003). Identifying reaction times in sprint starts: a comparison of wavelet analysis and custom algorithms, International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 2, 129-131.
    • Perry, J. (1999). The Contribution of Dynamic Electromyography to Gait Analysis. Department of Veterans Affairs. http://www.vard.org/mono/gait/perry.htm
    • Philipova, D. (1998). Auditory event related potentials and reaction time during decompression from hyperbaric trimix conditions. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 69, 545-50.
    • Roehrs, T., Burduvali, E., Bonahoom, A., Drake, C. and Roth, T. (2003). Ethanol and sleep loss: a "dose" comparison of impairing effects. Sleep, 26, 981-5.
    • Rothwell, J.C. and Valls-Solé, J. (2002). The startle reflex, voluntary movement, and the reticulospinal tract. In Progress in Motor Control, Volume Two Structure-Function Relations in Voluntary Movements (edited by M.L. Latash) 13-23 Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois.
    • Schmidt, R.A. and Lee, T.D. (1999). Motor Control and Learning 3rd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois.
    • Thompson, P.D., Colebatch, J.G., Brown, P., Rothwell, J.C., Day, B.L., Obeso, J.A., and Marsden, C.D. (1992). Voluntary stimulus-sensitive jerks and and jumps mimicking myoclonus or pathological startle syndromes. Movement Disorders, 7, 257-262.
    • Valls-Solé, J., Valldeoriola, F., Tolosa, E., and Nobbe, F. (1997). Habituation of the auditory startle reaction is reduced during preparation for execution of a motor task in normal human subjects. Brain Research. 751, 155.
    • Winter, E.M. and Brooks, F.B. (1991). Electromechanical response-times and muscle elasticity in men and women. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 63, 124-128.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article